Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
We don't all agree on that.
I've never really been in that boat either until recently.
At some point 400 richest = 160,000,000 poorest is a problem.
The modern mainstream media/democratic party definition or framing of the debate is not something I agree with though. Saying over 250k is rich, saying we need to "spread the wealth"
What we need to do is spread upward mobility and opportunity.