Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Rich (Now with the Upper Middle Class) Rich (Now with the Upper Middle Class)

07-11-2014 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
No one is saying that the two are equivalent though. Regardless, NYTimes says 120k is top 19% in NY metro area.
Schu basically is stating that they are more or less with his 94th percentile number argument.
07-11-2014 , 09:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Schu basically is stating that they are more or less with his 94th percentile number argument.
No he isn't schu is talking about the 200 and whatever number posited by max or mjkidd (forget who)
07-11-2014 , 09:18 AM
Seems weird to invest so much time trying to take specific info and turn it intobroad definitions of wealth

When is it less meaningful to say "makes 300k living in Spokane" than fussing with where that falls in some lower/middle/upper spectrum?
07-11-2014 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
That's the 94th percentile among married couples only. 96th overall.

That means that what, like 3% of the country is upper-middle class and 2% is upper-class? Sounds completely reasonable. Good to know that two married people making $100k/yr each are solidly middle-class folk too. Which means I'm like well below your poverty line which is at what, 65K/yr?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
No he isn't schu is talking about the 200 and whatever number posited by max or mjkidd (forget who)
07-11-2014 , 09:20 AM
adios doesn't know how to read. I was referring to that idiotic 270k/yr number that was posted.
07-11-2014 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
07-11-2014 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
Seems weird to invest so much time trying to take specific info and turn it intobroad definitions of wealth

When is it less meaningful to say "makes 300k living in Spokane" than fussing with where that falls in some lower/middle/upper spectrum?
I am not investing time in this thread. I fully acknowledge and embrace the idea that I am consciously wasting my time. It's cool though.
07-11-2014 , 10:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Lower class

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Upper middle class

Am I doing this right?
07-11-2014 , 10:02 AM
inherently, yes, this debate is a waste of time
07-11-2014 , 10:05 AM
one side has feelings, one has math.
07-11-2014 , 10:18 AM
This debate is incredibly interesting guys, good work
07-11-2014 , 10:20 AM
if (userOpinion == ikesOpinion)
{
userOpinion = logical
}
else
{
userOpinion = feelings
}

ikesbot.stop();
07-11-2014 , 10:28 AM
Just popping in to lol @ max and I want an EBT card asap.
07-11-2014 , 10:29 AM
Maybe we should try defining lower-rich instead of upper middle class.

Lower-rich = golf club membership of greater than 50k/yr., a gardener, and a wife (or husband) that wears funny looking hats.

Alternatively, rich begins when you could not work, and live off investments.
07-11-2014 , 10:33 AM
Maybe we need the butler scale:

Work as a butler: Lol microstakes.
No butler: Middle class.
Have a butler: You're rich, beeeeeeeyatch!
Can't even get a job as a butler: Here's your Obamaphone get back in the food desert you poors.
07-11-2014 , 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
Maybe we need the butler scale:

Work as a butler: Lol microstakes.
No butler: Middle class.
Have a butler: You're rich, beeeeeeeyatch!
Can't even get a job as a butler: Here's your Obamaphone get back in the food desert you poors.
Seems pretty accurate, imo.
07-11-2014 , 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
Maybe we need the butler scale:

Work as a butler: Lol microstakes.
No butler: Middle class.
Have a butler: You're rich, beeeeeeeyatch!
Can't even get a job as a butler: Here's your Obamaphone get back in the food desert you poors.
addendum:

your butler has an assistant - you are bill gates
07-11-2014 , 10:42 AM
NYC is weird because there are a lot of poor people, not a ton of middle class people, a decent amount of rich people and then like 3 more tiers of ultra rich, uber rich, and mind-blowingly rich.
07-11-2014 , 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
Maybe we need the butler scale:

Work as a butler: Lol microstakes.
No butler: Middle class.
Have a butler: You're rich, beeeeeeeyatch!
Can't even get a job as a butler: Here's your Obamaphone get back in the food desert you poors.


"My cousin doesn't have a butler, and he ain't worth ****."
07-11-2014 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
Just popping in to lol @ max and I want an EBT card asap.
I was really hoping you would make a joke about butler deserts.
07-11-2014 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
NYC is weird because there are a lot of poor people, not a ton of middle class people, a decent amount of rich people and then like 3 more tiers of ultra rich, uber rich, and mind-blowingly rich.
It's like how Eskimos supposedly have 48 words for snow. Except, instead of inventing their own categories ("only-went-to-Brown rich," "late-model Audi A7 upper middle class"), New Yorkers glom onto words for regular people.
07-11-2014 , 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
It's like how Eskimos supposedly have 48 words for snow. Except, instead of inventing their own categories ("only-went-to-Brown rich," "late-model Audi A7 upper middle class"), New Yorkers glom onto words for regular people.
Lots of New York's middle class at any given time are wearing 'I New York' t-shirts.
07-11-2014 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
While Max's views are obviously ludicrous for anyone who isn't a character in a Jane Austen novel (UMC = sufficient dynastic wealth for your children to be members of the rentier aristocracy), it's a helpful reminder that all discussion of class is basically an organizing framework for snobbishness. UMC is your kind of people, the truly wealthy are your social betters, and the merely middle class are your inferiors. It's totally relative and Max is very rich, so of course his idea of UMC is utterly distorted. (People who aren't rich use the simple three-class framework of lower, middle, and upper to direct their snobbery.)

In the end, anyone who makes more than 150 is rich, and I don't really care about all the DO YOU EXPECT ME TO LIVE IN QUEENS, LIKE AN ANIMAL?! whining.
I lolled
07-11-2014 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ineedaride2
Maybe we should try defining lower-rich instead of upper middle class.

Lower-rich = golf club membership of greater than 50k/yr., a gardener, and a wife (or husband) that wears funny looking hats.

Alternatively, rich begins when you could not work, and live off investments.
Rich people have a yacht, 3 homes, nice cars for everyone over 16, 2-4 full time household staff depending on if they have small children living at home or not. They spend well into six figures a year on entertainment excluding travel each year. Travel budget is also well into six figures per year. Mid six figure trust funds for all children. A rich guy can also divorce his wife and start a new family with a younger woman and support the same lifestyle for both families with no trouble. Should have eight figures liquid outside of retirement accounts by the time they are mid fifties.

Not sure what that translates to in yearly income but probably 3 million a year or so?
07-11-2014 , 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Rich people have a yacht, 3 homes, nice cars for everyone over 16, 2-4 full time household staff depending on if they have small children living at home or not. They spend well into six figures a year on entertainment excluding travel each year. Travel budget is also well into six figures per year. Mid six figure trust funds for all children. A rich guy can also divorce his wife and start a new family with a younger woman and support the same lifestyle for both families with no trouble. Should have eight figures liquid outside of retirement accounts by the time they are mid fifties.

Not sure what that translates to in yearly income but probably 3 million a year or so?
Sooo someone making 2 million a year isn't rich? Lol.

      
m