I mean, even if the timeline matched up, I've still never quite understood how people who do not work for any social media company saying "hey Twitter should ban some of the Nazis" caused this. Like they weren't gonna do it then they saw this 2p2 post? And instead of banning the Nazis, the thing I asked for, they hired The Weekly Standard to "fact check" liberal advocacy journalism?
It's shameless, it's bad arguing, and it's because Bill is way more sympathetic to the alt-right's views on a couple of issues(((I have my suspicions as to which))) but is too much of a ****ing coward to own his actual views on substance, so instead we get this fairy tale bull**** about free speech procedure.
Quote:
global warming flagged as unscientific, articles put in deep-freeze.
An entire ****ing political party, including the President that you and Glenn can't just seem to find time to critique, believes climate change is a ****ing hoax. We're already at the bottom of that slope!
P.S. Bill please stop lying about the articles you link. It's insulting! I know there's no swears but it really is quite rude.
Last edited by FlyWf; 09-12-2018 at 06:38 PM.