Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
I know what the double slit experiment is (not that it's relevant to the issue) and am very much on board with nuclear. If solar and wind are better, that's fine, build solar or wind. In the meantime, we should probably build 50 cookie cutter nuclear plants and overcome the political problem of waste disposal. Hell, nuclear is not even that tough of an issue technically, politically, or legally. Pay OK or TX to store waste if NV doesn't want it.
One problem with having Trump and the idiot republicans in power is the opportunity cost of being able to do actual things instead of engaging in grifting and performative racism.
Those two sentences do not go together. If you don't know if solar and wind are better, why would you suggest that we build 50 nuclear power plants? And if you don't know the cost of a solar panel this year, and not three years ago, you should not reach a conclusion on this even if you do know the double slit experiment. A lot of people seem to think that if they are at all anti-nuclear someone is going to take away their very serious person card. Well I guess they're right about that.