Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
oh forgive me, I thought that "obviously no violence" and by extension no threats of violence was a general moral rule that perhaps would apply even to Tucker Carlson
Like when I emerged from the forest as a human wolf pup and did not understand normal human customs, the first thing my adopted human caretakers told me was that it was generally impolite and uncouth to threaten people outside their homes, people deserve piece and quiet, but they did make exceptions for bad people although candidly they did not hand me a decision tree that laid out every scenario and they instructed me that sometimes humans will have to insert some ad hoc judgement into their ethical dilemmas.
I am observing human society with curiosity too. Is it so that humans say "obviously no violence"? That sounds a little glib, for instance recently some Nazis got punched in the face and I noticed lots of people had a good laugh about that and cheered it on, for instance:
https://canipunchnazis.com/
Many people said yes, in fact we should absolutely beat the **** out of Nazis and enjoy that as sport. That seems OK? I am new to this human world but Richard Spencer, he seems like he should absolutely be punched right in his ****ing face. Perhaps Tucker Carlson is like this fellow, too?
So my wolf mother, god bless her, she did not tell me much about this human world and I am having to learn as I go, and yet I do not think "obviously no violence" is some normative rule? I think perhaps you have misunderstood these rules but wolf brother I am excited to be on this journey with you, god bless and amen.