Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
A Proper 2018 Senate Elections Thread A Proper 2018 Senate Elections Thread

10-09-2018 , 01:58 PM
Albert Einstein?
10-09-2018 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
Inso,

I’ll give you 5-1 on her opponent up to $1k
No thanks. I'd rather kick myself later for turning it down than be in a position where I win and can't collect.

If she wins though, it'll be by under 3%. Up 11-13 points is laughable.
10-09-2018 , 02:12 PM
Will escrow, of course.
10-09-2018 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
No thanks. I'd rather kick myself later for turning it down than be in a position where I win and can't collect.
lmao, preemptively calling your opponent a welcher to avoid accepting 5-1 odds on something you just staked a bold claim on
10-09-2018 , 02:22 PM
I imagine a poster or two would be interested in betting on her +3 pts as well since you're trying so hard to not bet against her straight up.
10-09-2018 , 02:28 PM
I bet McCain won’t win NY.
10-09-2018 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus

https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1049484928596017152
That's fantastic. Also Rafael is skipping a town hall debate with Beto so Beto will do it alone (this after previously challenging Beto to 5 debates).
10-09-2018 , 03:09 PM
Tammy Baldwin is 88% on PI. Actually UP 2% since yesterday. I wish overreacting hot takes (on both sides!) were a bannable offense around here, especially if the poster is not willing to back it with a bet
10-09-2018 , 03:31 PM
No need to ban insooooo just elect a Dem and he will slink away of his own accord
10-09-2018 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
You know who else had a 97% chance of winning, roughly 3 hours before results were tallied?
Martin Scorsese?
10-09-2018 , 04:33 PM
La La Land
10-09-2018 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
No thanks. I'd rather kick myself later for turning it down than be in a position where I win and can't collect.

If she wins though, it'll be by under 3%. Up 11-13 points is laughable.
this should be a bannable offense
10-09-2018 , 04:49 PM
The Atlanta Falcons.
10-09-2018 , 05:09 PM
what exactly happened in Tennessee for the Democrat Swift is backing to go from 55% to 41% in the past month according to 538?
10-09-2018 , 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
You know who else had a 97% chance of winning, roughly 3 hours before results were tallied?
On the 538 live model? Nobody. Hillary was at like 68-70 percent to win right before the results were tallied.
10-09-2018 , 05:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by businessdude
what exactly happened in Tennessee for the Democrat Swift is backing to go from 55% to 41% in the past month according to 538?
The “undecided” (lol yeah right) republicans came home.
10-09-2018 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
this should be a bannable offense
This isn't 2004, we can't just do anonymous Stars transfers. I don't have any crypto accounts.
10-09-2018 , 06:10 PM
Yeah instead it's PayPal, or Venmo, oh noes, so hard, much distress, very welch
10-09-2018 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
This isn't 2004, we can't just do anonymous Stars transfers. I don't have any crypto accounts.
Lol bull**** you slunk out of a bet you offered while calling someone a welcher
10-09-2018 , 06:22 PM
It is *way* easier to transfer money in 2018 than 2004.
10-09-2018 , 06:24 PM
At least we got an ad calling Ted Cruz a craven, pisspants, lesser-than. Come on Ted.
10-09-2018 , 06:31 PM
How come Beto is like 45 but every old picture of him looks OLD, like pre 1968
10-09-2018 , 07:03 PM
SCOTUS upheld North dakota's you need a street address to vote law. (this was w/o kav)

In other words get ****ed native americans.

From here https://www.motherjones.com/politics...otans-to-vote/
Ginsburg noted that according to the factual record of the case, about 20 percent of voters likely to try to cast a ballot in the midterms will lack the required identification.

TWENTY PERCENT WTF
10-09-2018 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan dissented.
So Sotomayor and Breyer upheld? Why?
10-09-2018 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
So Sotomayor and Breyer upheld? Why?
My understanding is that this wasn't an actual case, this was them declining to hear the case... So it's anonymous unless they sign on to a dissent, so it could have been 6-2, 5-3 or 4-4 as far as we know, but only RBG dissented with Kagan signing on.

      
m