This is from a couple days ago and most of the reaction was confusion/mockery

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...57910297980928

was just reminded that this is another case of Trump accusing others of his own wrongdoings
It was the question where Trump was asked about, you've had a history of denigrating women, calling them pigs... and he interrupted with "Only Rosie O'Donnell!" and the crowd laughed, and Trump was applauded by pundits for his stellar political skills... it was phony.

if i were to participate in a filibuster i would print and read out this thread, including the trolls.

57onRed often makes some posts showing how awful he is, then disappears and you'll nazi him around for a while.

Sorry, didn't have the context, having a bad morning, will read more and post less.

well we have more information about this guy now. approximately 10 more years of decisions. by your logic anyone confirmed to the circuit is a shoe-in for scotus.

This is okay, but it has too much of the suggestion that Trump is playing 3D chess with the media. The truth is that he recognizes the "fake news" NYT and Washington Post are American institutions. They have been around his whole life, and they were the papers he read before they started looking carefully at him. He wants desperately for the credible news media to view him favorably, which is why he gives them exclusives and puts on his indoor voice when talking to them.

I think it's part of this, but the Conservative kayfab goes way back and beyond Trump. I'll have to go back and find the article to illustrate one specific point, but during the election year reporters noticed that all these Conservative politicians that supposedly hated the "mainstream media" were also the ones most likely to pal around with them. Ted Cruz brought reporters donuts, and went back and forth with them, Santorum and Huckabee courted reporters as much as they could, meanwhile Clinton and Sanders actively disliked the media.

They kayfab is for the rubes and is set up for the dynamic that the article lays out. Conservatives can plead their case to the normals in the mainstream media and tell their captive audience to ignore what they don't want them to digest from the non Conservative media.

just another coincidence that suspiciously LOOKS like covert coordination between the putin and trump regimes

lol. Trump's statements on Obama failing in Syria are public!

you're right. it's blatantly overt coordination at this point.

king abdullah for president.

the whole point of my post is that its terrible to produce ANY weapons,I have no idea how u understood the above from my post.
I guess no one saw the effects of radiations and nukes on people but I dont see how better it is than chemicals.
also 60M americans at least,think its good to build more nukes.

My bad I didnt take into account that there were no wounded cause of guns.
you can argue how much you want about the subject,a drone attack or lets say the bombing that made 200 dead recently,it wasnt that clean.

I obviously have no idea about what im talking about but somehow I feel Im not alone here theorizing on things.

There hundreds of conflicts zones in the world,and and getting involved in a foreign country doesnt strike me as pure intentions from USA most of the time.
There is a massive difference between responding to an allied country to defend from an invader,and invading a country to change said country regime.

Regardless of the difference between gas and conventional attacks and Obama's, Trump's or whatever any of us would choose to do in reaction to Assad's gas attack, there's still the fact that Trump killed more civilians in Syria in March than ISIS or Russia. Assad still edged him out, but not by much.

Re: Gorsuch

He is not an extremist.

You may question the source, but the same figures ran in NYT and WaPo without dispute. Gorsuch would not even be the most conservative member of the court. Before anyone brings up the frozen truck driver, bosses being able to fire anyone at any time because freedom is bog standard conservative orthodoxy.

In a hypothetical 2016-2017 where Merrick Garland was confirmed, Marco Rubio won the election with no funny business, and RBG died in January, Gorsuch should absolutely be confirmed.

Whatever I know no one cares about integrity or consistency, but it sets a terrible precedent to be like "we reject him because of his extreme views which are totally standard for his party that makes up almost half the country," especially when that's not even the real reason.

Whether Trump was responsible for killing civilians or not, we do know that he promised as much (targeting families) during his campaign.

i dont care what the **** a neil gorsuch is, he's not merrick garland

You do realize that there is nobody serious out there saying "hey all these nukes we have, why don't we use them?" right? And that everybody is aware of the horrors that were caused when the world used nukes on cities? Everyone regards it as one of the most black pages of our history. I agree that the USA and Russia are a bit obsessive about their nukes but neither party really wants to use them. We all know they both had plenty of opportunities in modern history.

I don't have to argue bombs vs chemical weapons, your argument was clearly that firearms are just as bad. Fwiw there is a major difference between the bombs official armed forces use in conflict and the bombs terrorist groups et cetera use. The type of bombs you are referring to are also illegal. I do agree drone strikes are very problematic and should probably be illegal as well but that isn't an argument to say "et alors?" about chemical weapons.

The recent type of argumentation of not judging x because y exists is a very irritating fallacy. Literally any **** you dare complain about that can be argued away using that type of arguments. "You dare complain about x? Look at y, clearly a ****tier situation than you are in. Why you complaining?"

I also agree that USAs foreign policy is a disaster (which is what you are referring to I assume) but everybody always uses that to say that any type of invasion is bad. That is an oversimplification and not true.

This is absolute insanity. What are you talking about?

Yeah I agree, and I've said this a million times. But that's the only reason (well that and **** Trump). All of this flailing around to find other reasons "Holy ****, he copied some facts! --> Intellectually bankrupt, not fit to serve," are not only absurd, but also a waste of time and disingenuous.

Yes, it is clear that we have to hope that Trump does as little as possible when it comes to armed conflicts. It's probably better for the world to let everyone else deal with that **** for 4 years, even though that will certainly result in tragedy as well.

Gorsuch is absolutely extreme. The Supreme Court ruled against him UNANIMOUSLY during his own confirmation hearings.


https://twitter.com/G_N_Huftalen_Jr/...36651074744322

Gorsuch has an extreme right-wing worldview. He would be positioned well to the right of Scalia:

https://twitter.com/ilyseh/status/848733980442509312

Why is everyone in a hurry to overlook the plagiarism charge? Particularly in a SCOTUS nomination? Isn't doing academic work pretty much what those guys do all the time? Why wouldn't you hold him accountable for doing shoddy work?

538 analysis indicates that Gorsuch would be more conservative than the extreme Antonin Scalia. This guy is WAY out of the judicial mainstream, make no doubt about it:

How Trump’s Nominee Will Alter The Supreme Court
https://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wo...ll&w=575&ssl=1

Rather than tilt at windmills you might be better advised to focus on how your fabulous USA#1 is going to rid itself of the fascist it elected as President despite the checks and balances of the founding fathers we've heard so much about over the years from blind patriots who couldn't see that the lineage of GOP Presidents from Nixon onwards was leading inexorably to a fascist POTUS.

Once you've done that, try to work out what changes need to be made to USA#1's patently unfair electoral system and its horribly flawed form of representative democracy that allowed a fascist to become President.

Or you could continue trying to blame another country for the existence of Trump supporters like BS, because USA#1.