Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

04-04-2017 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
There's one thing you can say about the hypothetical President Hillary Clinton, she wouldn't have taken the **** that happened in Syria just now (if it even happened at all) lying down like "welllll there's nothing we can really do about it". Even Sushy knows she would do something to oppose and stop future attacks more meaningful than what Trump is doing right now.

But Sushy don't currrrrrr because he just worships Daddy.
Ay, there's the rub... by doing so she would've started World War III. Just as they said.
04-04-2017 , 10:40 PM
And since awvalololol loves Mattis so much, here is him agreeing with me.

http://www.businessinsider.com/matti...unition-2017-2
04-04-2017 , 10:42 PM
the person in charge of education policy thinks public education should be abolished
the person in charge of diplomacy hates speaking to people
the person in charge of the EPA was suing the EPA for the right to pollute
linda mcmahon is in the line of succession
the sanest guy in the white house is named mad dog
04-04-2017 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
What other government organizations has she been in charge of or even part of? What was their budget? Just because she runs a business doesn't mean she knows how to run a government office about businesses.
She co-ran a business entirely predicated on putting smaller competitors OUT of business. She's just as uniquely unqualified as most of the rest of them.
04-04-2017 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Han YOLO
the person in charge of education policy thinks public education should be abolished
the person in charge of diplomacy hates speaking to people
the person in charge of the EPA was suing the EPA for the right to pollute
linda mcmahon is in the line of succession
the sanest guy in the white house is named mad dog
04-04-2017 , 11:03 PM
Sushy is admitting he is trolling. Isn't that a ban? Either way, dude is off his rocker. LOL @ blaming Obama simply because Daddy said so and it must be so if Daddy said so.
04-04-2017 , 11:06 PM
When are these dumb ****s going to stop asking unanswerable questions for obvious reasons to people who are conducting the investigation?

Just watched the Castro clip.


Any rumors out there of Wolf retiring? lol
04-04-2017 , 11:20 PM
I'm guessing this is why Daddy Sush didn't want to throw out the first pitch. Sad!

04-04-2017 , 11:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
I enjoy sexual relations with geese.
Hey, if that's your thing, cool. I'm not here to judge.
04-04-2017 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by weeeez
can someone explain to me why chemical weapons are so bad compared to nukes and guns?
why is it that we cant use them but nuking or bombarding is ok?
They're a weapon of mass destruction. Nerve gas like Sarin or VX could easily wipe out a city.
04-04-2017 , 11:51 PM
Also noting that BS avoided answering my question, so I'll ask it again:

Sushy, with respect to Syria, what would you have had Obama actually do?
04-04-2017 , 11:52 PM
Here's a thought guys: Sushy is like 65 and is never changing his mind on any of this. What are you all doing?
04-05-2017 , 12:06 AM
coming out now that Gorsuch plagiarized hard in his book. though maybe b/c legal **** he can't deviate much--not that it will make a difference ofc.

Is it bad I figure there's a decent chance he simply ruled against the trucker b/c race not b/c pro corp and all?
04-05-2017 , 12:11 AM
this uh gorsuch plaigarism scandal thing looks pretty dumb


edit- slow pony

it doesn't look particularly egregious at all and no one in america will care or probably should care
04-05-2017 , 12:16 AM
This guy decided he wanted to write a book, and the topic closest to his heart was ****ing “The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia," and I'm guessing not in terms of "it'll be great as assisted suicide and euthanasia become more well-understood and accepted, socially and legally." And then he couldn't even be bothered to do his own work, he plagiarized on it. What a creeper.

Gorsuch's writings borrow from other authors
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...e-court-236891
Quote:
Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch copied the structure and language used by several authors and failed to cite source material in his book and an academic article, according to documents provided to POLITICO.

The documents show that several passages from the tenth chapter of his 2006 book, “The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,” read nearly verbatim to a 1984 article in the Indiana Law Journal. In several other instances in that book and an academic article published in 2000, Gorsuch borrowed from the ideas, quotes and structures of scholarly and legal works without citing them.
04-05-2017 , 12:17 AM
Quote:
this uh gorsuch plaigarism scandal thing looks pretty dumb


edit- slow pony

it doesn't look particularly egregious at all and no one in america will care or probably should care
I swear to science "well-qualified" is some kind of code word for white affirmative action. 45* is all about giving the highest positions in the country to mediocre ****ing white dudes.
04-05-2017 , 12:23 AM
LOOOOL, that HAS to be like a secret prerequisite or something. There's like a half-dozen of them now that have been outed as plagiarists.
04-05-2017 , 12:32 AM
Here's the thing conservatives showed up to vote for Donald Trump, even though he lost the popular vote by 2.9 million. A lot of them say they did so for this, the chance to nominate an extremely conservative Supreme Court justice. But they didn't want a great thinker, someone to divine right from wrong and read the Constitution properly. They didn't want someone who would apply the law equally to every citizen and across all quarters. They were looking for a soldier, someone who could faithfully be counted on to vote the party line, and someone to do that for forty plus years. And make no mistake about it, the party line is fascism. Authoritarianism. Voter Suppression. More Gerrymandering, more Electoral College (slaveholder math), more money in politics with no transparency or accountability. More people getting screwed and lobbyists and big corporations getting away with everything. More, more more.
04-05-2017 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noze
Here's a thought guys: Sushy is like 65 and is never changing his mind on any of this. What are you all doing?
they're making the forum unreadable
04-05-2017 , 12:47 AM
The only thing keeping this country together in any sense whatsoever is just the fact that these people are very, very inept fascists.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/m...solved-it.html
Quote:
Zucker had breakfast with Kushner a few weeks later in Manhattan. Kushner wanted to know why CNN still hadn’t fired anti-Trump commentators like Jones and Ana Navarro, who said on CNN in October that every Republican would have to answer the question of what they did the day they saw a tape of “this man boasting about grabbing a woman’s pussy.” (The comment elicited an angry response from one of CNN’s pro-Trump talking heads, Scottie Nell Hughes: “Will you please stop saying that word?” she demanded. “My daughter is listening.”) Zucker tried to explain that even though Trump won, the network still needed what he described as “a diversity of opinion.”
04-05-2017 , 12:47 AM
Sushy is a conservative that wants to argue politics. Deal with it.
04-05-2017 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
LOOOOL, that HAS to be like a secret prerequisite or something. There's like a half-dozen of them now that have been outed as plagiarists.
They're so white privileged, they don't even do "office labor." They just pay somebody like they would to mow their lawn and go live in their world where they exercise extreme power over other peoples' lives and the world.
04-05-2017 , 12:53 AM
I'm not saying I wish Mitch McConnell death. But if he were die tomorrow, I would pay good money to piss on his grave. ****er makes me ashamed to say I am a Kentuckian.
04-05-2017 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
1) Keep my name out of your mouth.

2) You can't ****ing tut-tut about how I'm only doing online activism(p.s. you don't know me, shut the **** up) when you aren't even doing that. You are, in fact, also posting, but you're posting racist bull**** about how Democrats don't help blacks to keep them poor and Donald Trump is a rich guy who cares about the common man.

3) One thing I did that you didn't is vote for Hillary.
Ooh. I seem to have struck a nerve. The truth's a *****, ain't it? And the reality that I actually DID swallow hard and voted for HRC, while you got the MVP assist in getting a racist pig elected must make it sting all the more. But keep patting yourself on the back for pointing out the important stuff like how some people didn't show enough outrage when racist **** got said during a private phone call.

      
m