Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-30-2017 , 09:11 PM
Came across this on Twitter. It's not a verified account so it's probably 99% hearsay but LOL if true.

03-30-2017 , 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Came across this on Twitter. It's not a verified account so it's probably 99% hearsay but LOL if true.

I'm sure travelphotography.net is ready to crack this case open wide

Reads like that volcano insurance salesman from family guy, btw.
03-30-2017 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Maddow will have the WSJ reporter who broke that story on tonight
Shane Harris (WSJ senior writer) on Maddow now.
03-30-2017 , 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Came across this on Twitter. It's not a verified account so it's probably 99% hearsay but LOL if true.

This is simply porn. Fun, but not the real thing.
03-30-2017 , 09:15 PM
It wouldn't surprise me if it was Trump's idea to have Nunes "vindicate" his "Obama spied on me" lie. People are saying Bannon, which makes sense of course, but Trump has done this kind of thing before. Nunes is just the fictional John Miller come to life.
03-30-2017 , 09:18 PM
is it really that easy to get immunity?

act like you got something juicy then say whatever boring that isnt a clear lie and youre done?
03-30-2017 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Came across this on Twitter. It's not a verified account so it's probably 99% hearsay but LOL if true.

oh come on
03-30-2017 , 09:19 PM
in before president ryan LUL
03-30-2017 , 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
This is simply porn. Fun, but not the real thing.
Yea I was thinking that too. Being POTUS is really the only thing keeping Trump out of jail if all of this stuff is true. Stepping down takes away that leverage.
03-30-2017 , 09:20 PM
kirby,

nah immunity deals are always conditional, and generally can be revoked at any time if the recipient is found to be lying about anything
03-30-2017 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
in before president ryan LUL
Wouldn't it be Mike Pence? or do they get to pick.
03-30-2017 , 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Yea I was thinking that too. Being POTUS is really the only thing keeping Trump out of jail if all of this stuff is true. Stepping down takes away that leverage.
i have a feeling he's going to pardon like 20 people then get pardoned within one hour
03-30-2017 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
It wouldn't surprise me if it was Trump's idea to have Nunes "vindicate" his "Obama spied on me" lie. People are saying Bannon, which makes sense of course, but Trump has done this kind of thing before. Nunes is just the fictional John Miller come to life.
Well it seems pretty clear that Nunes has been running interference for the White House. We don't know the extent of Trump's collaboration (if any) and how much of Nunes' story has substance (if any).
03-30-2017 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
kirby,

nah immunity deals are always conditional, and generally can be revoked at any time if the recipient is found to be lying about anything
right but what im saying is he can honeydick about "story to tell!!!" when in fact he has nothing
03-30-2017 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klingbard
Shot and chaser from Fox expert. [Not "Judge" Napolitano]



https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/847608312505839616

lol BillO.
After this exchange Billo challenges the guest to a fistfight and shuts off his mic
03-30-2017 , 09:33 PM
If there's some kind of antidote to polonium poisoning someone needs to tell Mike Flynn to go buy some, like stat.
03-30-2017 , 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
kirby,

nah immunity deals are always conditional, and generally can be revoked at any time if the recipient is found to be lying about anything
This, plus they're gonna want to know he has something substantive before snapping off immunity.
03-30-2017 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
right but what im saying is he can honeydick about "story to tell!!!" when in fact he has nothing
no, because the immunity deal will be conditional on him having legit useful information. if he's found not to possess useful information, then the offer will be removed from the table.
03-30-2017 , 09:37 PM
you have to sit down and go through a lengthy disclosure/questioning process to reveal all your information before any deals are finalized
03-30-2017 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
oh come on
It's okay. If it bubbles enough to get trump to defiantly tweet he is not resigning it will have served a purpose.
03-30-2017 , 09:44 PM
Maddow showed a clip of John Dean's Watergate testimony and I'll be ****ed if what he said there sounds EXACTLY like what we are hearing here.
03-30-2017 , 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Well it seems pretty clear that Nunes has been running interference for the White House. We don't know the extent of Trump's collaboration (if any) and how much of Nunes' story has substance (if any).
Yes. I mean the idea of providing information that backs up his lie through a 3rd party. Not the details- Trump would get Bannon to handle those, including which personnel to use.
03-30-2017 , 09:57 PM
please god let Robert Kraft be mixed up criminally in this somehow
03-30-2017 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
no, because the immunity deal will be conditional on him having legit useful information. if he's found not to possess useful information, then the offer will be removed from the table.
wow ok, good.

So we can actually start eating the popcorn?
03-30-2017 , 09:59 PM
Clicked that link, now concerned about my comp. (And...it's gone. TY mods.)

      
m