Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-26-2017 , 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
Much better.
03-26-2017 , 11:44 AM

https://twitter.com/ars_ves/status/845957537220440064
"10 thousand chanting no war in St. Petersburg #ДимонОтветит "
03-26-2017 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Much better.
I feel somewhat vindicated.
03-26-2017 , 11:50 AM
Why doesn't SNL have any Hispanic cast members???
03-26-2017 , 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raheem
Why doesn't SNL have any Hispanic cast members???
You really need to take a break from these forums.

Also, Horatio Sanz was a cast member in the past.
03-26-2017 , 11:54 AM
Everyone, myself included, could follow this more.

http://digg.com/video/political-persuasion
03-26-2017 , 11:58 AM
03-26-2017 , 11:58 AM
If Trump is trying to get rid of Ryan and fails, he pisses off a guy who can stomp on the impeachment accelerator and end up president. If he succeeds, what does he gain? Revenge? Ok, that makes sense in Trump world i guess.
03-26-2017 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
That's good. It's good to have diversity.
03-26-2017 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
60 Votes for Gorsuch:

52 GOP
+
Heitkamp - ND
McCaskill - MO
Manchin - WV
Donnelly - IN
Tester - MT
+
Feinstein - CA (retiring, on judiciary committee)
+
Nelson - FL (election in 2018)
+
King - ME (independent, maverick)

There's 60 right there. There's even more that could push him over per Politico.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...-senate-234521

And here's the thing. You'll have some vote for cloture and then vote against for the actual vote. I bet he wins cloture 61-39 and wins the actual vote 55-45 or something like that.
Fwiw predict has odds of yes vote by 4/30 (so there is deadline in play) at:
Heitkamp 59%
McCaskill 19%
Donnelly 58%
Tester 62%
King 61%

No markets for others.
03-26-2017 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
Didn't she have a bunch of racist **** on twitter that she forgot to remove after she was announced?
03-26-2017 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
If Trump is trying to get rid of Ryan and fails, he pisses off a guy who can stomp on the impeachment accelerator and end up president. If he succeeds, what does he gain? Revenge? Ok, that makes sense in Trump world i guess.
Bannon has been strategically targeting Ryan for awhile now. He's the "globalist enemy" of Trump's big core fan base over at Breitbart.

From October 2016:
He’s With Her: Inside Paul Ryan’s Months-Long Campaign to Elect Hillary Clinton President
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...ton-president/
03-26-2017 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Dude come on. I was so drunk on election night. Give me some slack on the "we're taking our country back" quip.
Lol. Everything you need to know about the Breitbart crowd right here.
03-26-2017 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
This can't possibly be true can it?
Well ok, but invited a friend and ally to the White House and trying to humiliate her with a stunt like that is certainly up there.
03-26-2017 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan

Of course I campaigned against her in the primary
Sure, we all remember your long history of doing this.
03-26-2017 , 12:22 PM
it would be funny if the freedom caucus threatens to default on the national debt or shut down the government, only because that's trump's signature move and he'll be pissed he can't threaten it himself.
03-26-2017 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Didn't she have a bunch of racist **** on twitter that she forgot to remove after she was announced?
Something about it on wikipedia, but I'm not familiar with her or the story so I have no idea if there was artistic license or anything like that.
03-26-2017 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
60 Votes for Gorsuch:

52 GOP
+
Heitkamp - ND
McCaskill - MO
Manchin - WV
Donnelly - IN
Tester - MT
+
Feinstein - CA (retiring, on judiciary committee)
+
Nelson - FL (election in 2018)
+
King - ME (independent, maverick)

There's 60 right there. There's even more that could push him over per Politico.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...-senate-234521

And here's the thing. You'll have some vote for cloture and then vote against for the actual vote. I bet he wins cloture 61-39 and wins the actual vote 55-45 or something like that.
no
03-26-2017 , 12:26 PM

https://twitter.com/TAPSTRIMEDIA/sta...31987081142273
03-26-2017 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
Brutal

h3h3 Ethan on the topic, infuriating:



Probably worth discussing in the LC Thread or a net neutrality thread, but worth throwing this video up here for those unaware.

WaPo story for those that don't like youtube:
The Senate just voted to undo landmark rules covering your Internet privacy

Vote was 52-48 along party lines smdh.

maybe i should start a business of buying peoples internet history and then blackmailing
03-26-2017 , 12:35 PM
Nance is a boss.
03-26-2017 , 12:41 PM
I don't see the problem with trump golfing so much. He's showing quite clearly that he has the stamina and is willing to put in the work to make sure all parties involved (other than him) are adequately blamed for his AHCA failure.
03-26-2017 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
I don't see the problem with trump golfing so much. He's showing quite clearly that he has the stamina and is willing to put in the work to make sure all parties involved (other than him) are adequately blamed for his AHCA failure.
He was also very willing to put in the work to push a horrible bill for the American people without actually learning the specifics of it, and then saying it was probably best that the bill didn't pass lol.
03-26-2017 , 12:49 PM

https://twitter.com/yashar/status/846037853788364800


I agree with Ted. All these clown-news whores have done incredible damage to the US. Obviously, they are not the only ones responsible.
03-26-2017 , 12:49 PM
There are way to many MSNBC Links here, it is just left Fox News with the same credibility. Can we go back to actual news outlets?

      
m