Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

01-28-2017 , 01:47 PM
At this point I'm just as worried about the wall being used like the Berlin Wall, to keep people in.
01-28-2017 , 01:47 PM
The dow jones is a close to meaningless as a measure of the economy as could be designed. You should never base any decision on it nor use it in any economic debate.

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/20...lieve-the-hype


This is why it will surely be Trump's primary measure of the economy.
01-28-2017 , 01:49 PM
Another thing that pisses me off about that insane ban: there are lots of young people who live in ****ty theocracies like Iran who love American culture, look up to America for values like freedom and tolerance, and have the potential to make their society better in the future. Now America told them they want nothing to do with them. Good job, morons.
01-28-2017 , 01:49 PM
I wish there was a betting market for the price of Trump's idiotic wall. I would snap place every dollar I have on the over of $15 billion.
01-28-2017 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukraprout
Another thing that pisses me off about that insane ban: there are lots of young people who live in ****ty theocracies like Iran who love American culture, look up to America for values like freedom and tolerance, and have the potential to make their society better in the future. Now America told them they want nothing to do with them. Good job, morons.
The KKK is basically running the country. These are not people known for thier subtle understanding of global geopolitics. Thier political inquiry does not go beyond brown people are bad.
01-28-2017 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukraprout
Another thing that pisses me off about that insane ban: there are lots of young people who live in ****ty theocracies like Iran who love American culture, look up to America for values like freedom and tolerance, and have the potential to make their society better in the future. Now America told them they want nothing to do with them. Good job, morons.

Trump Refugee Rule May Block Military Interpreters from US
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2...reters-us.html
Quote:
A new executive order issued by President Donald Trump on Friday that temporarily halts the entrance of most refugees into the U.S. while indefinitely ending the entrance of refugees from Syria may impact a program that brings to the U.S. Iraqis and Afghans who have served with American forces as interpreters.

The executive order, signed Friday evening, puts at least a 120-day hold on new refugees from all countries while officials conduct a review of the refugee screening process. A separate rule also puts a 90-day hold on the entrance of all immigrants from a series of countries considered particularly high-risk, including Iraq. When the refugee program restarts, the order states, the U.S. will accept only 50,000 refugees annually, down from the current 110,000.

Currently, only one percent of the world's 19.5 million refugees are ever resettled, according to Catholic Social Services, a nonprofit that assists the U.S. government with refugees.

Interpreters who work for U.S. forces are able to apply for resettlement in the U.S. under a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program because they are often targeted for assassination due to their association with the U.S. The SIV program in Afghanistan is still accepting new applicants, according to the State Department, while a near identical program existed in Iraq until it was sunset for new applicants last April.

About 500 Iraqi applicants and their families and about 13,000 Afghan applicants and their families are still in the SIV pipeline awaiting final approval, officials with State Department said. The application for resettlement through SIV can take up to three years, according to SIV advocates, in part because SIV refugees receive vetting from every U.S. intelligence agency, they said.
01-28-2017 , 01:52 PM
Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen


the only country where the US has not bombed in the last few years is Iran. common sense would dictate closer scrutiny is paid to citizens coming from those countries.
01-28-2017 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
The dow jones is a close to meaningless as a measure of the economy as could be designed. You should never base any decision on it nor use it in any economic debate.

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/20...lieve-the-hype


This is why it will surely be Trump's primary measure of the economy.
I get that, but the NASDAQ etc are at decent levels also (I shouldn't have mentioned the Dow Jones perhaps). It's the lack of a fairly significant drop over the last couple of months I'm struggling with.
01-28-2017 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
At this point I'm just as worried about the wall being used like the Berlin Wall, to keep people in.
Yeah, and here's where we're going to pay for not holding Obama accountable for not rolling back the Patriot act, no fly lists without due process, illegal spying on Americans, etc.

I mean we were in a no-win situation since the Republicans would have only been worse, but I feel like I should have fought much harder about this stuff.
01-28-2017 , 01:58 PM
Hey great, now a border war with Iran. Beautiful. In one week we have a border war with Iran and a trade war with Mexico.

Thisisfine.jpg
01-28-2017 , 02:00 PM
Refugee screening is already very rigorous. Donald's dumb**** squad will almost assuredly make it less so while telling everyone they are safer than ever.
01-28-2017 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTD
Can some expert explain the Dow Jones level to me? I do have some qualifications in investment but I can't get my head around it.

If you have very low unemployment and low immigration, then you can't get growth from more workers to support your base. Improved efficiency seems dubious (even without the wall), and where do new ideas come from if there is a tech brain drain from the US? I guess Trump may say he's helping small businesses get off the ground, but I'm struggling to make sense of it.
The DOW Jones is basically worthless and it's only still valued because it's been around forever.

There have been two Planet Money podcast about the DOW in the last few months. Worth checking out.
01-28-2017 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukraprout
Another thing that pisses me off about that insane ban: there are lots of young people who live in ****ty theocracies like Iran who love American culture, look up to America for values like freedom and tolerance, and have the potential to make their society better in the future. Now America told them they want nothing to do with them. Good job, morons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JICVgMoSCQ
01-28-2017 , 02:02 PM
Interesting article:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7550601.html
Quote:
China military official says war with US under Donald Trump 'becoming practical reality'

Last edited by DBLK; 01-28-2017 at 02:10 PM.
01-28-2017 , 02:02 PM
So why are people with green cards being banned? Is it a technicality in a poorly worded order or is it intentional? If intentional, I find banning people with green cards to be highly alarming. I'm a conservative but didn't vote for Trump. I'm hoping even Trump supporters will realize how messed up this is unless it's a misunderstanding from the intent of the bill.
01-28-2017 , 02:05 PM
Of ****ing course its intentional.

Trumps policy = If you aren't white, gtfo
01-28-2017 , 02:15 PM
ACLU sues White House over immigration ban!

Last edited by yeSpiff; 01-28-2017 at 02:16 PM. Reason: nice avatar microbet! =)
01-28-2017 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBLK
Thisisfinedog.jpg
01-28-2017 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullycider
Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen


the only country where the US has not bombed in the last few years is Iran. common sense would dictate closer scrutiny is paid to citizens coming from those countries.
How about you describe for us what the immigration process from those places used to be like, and why it was inadequate, if you indeed support "scrutiny" and not a total ban?
01-28-2017 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeSpiff
ACLU sues White House over immigration ban!
So what. He is about to put a knuckle dragging partisan on the court. The Supreme Court will allow every disgusting non-constitutional thing he comes up with in a 5/4 vote because sadly there does not appear to be one ****ing republican with an ounce of character.
01-28-2017 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
How about you describe for us what the immigration process from those places used to be like, and why it was inadequate, if you indeed support "scrutiny" and not a total ban?
Rotfl. You are asking a trumpkin for evidence to back up thier position. Good one. I needed a chuckle.
01-28-2017 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
So what. He is about to put a knuckle dragging partisan on the court. The Supreme Court will allow every disgusting non-constitutional thing he comes up with in a 5/4 vote because sadly there does not appear to be one ****ing republican with an ounce of character.
Then the Democrats must not let him. I will be contacting both my senators upon his announcement of his candidate and demanding a filibuster lest they lose my vote next election.
01-28-2017 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullycider


no ladders in the part of the world?


01-28-2017 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Then the Democrats must not let him. I will be contacting both my senators upon his announcement of his candidate and demanding a filibuster lest they lose my vote next election.
I've been questioning whether the Democrats should stoop to the new set of rules created by the republicans during Obama's presidency, and after the first week, I don't see how that is not the only optional play.

Obstruct, obstruct, obstruct.

Everything.

Every single thing he attempts to do that the Senate and house have the possibility to obstruct , good or bad, from now until the end of his term.

This cannot stand.
01-28-2017 , 02:24 PM
Serious question; at what point does violence become morally-required when a corrupt government has taken control and normal checks and balances are failing?

We are not at this point yet, but unbelievably it's something that requires serious discussion given the tea leaves.

      
m