Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-23-2017 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark


just a matter of time now, but will anything come of it?
Why would anything come of it? Half a dozens of his Team had contact with the Russians including Jeff Sessions who also lied about it under oath.

Do you think people will be like. "Ok, 6 Russian spies is fine with me but 7 is to much, **** Trump!"
03-23-2017 , 11:30 AM
lol he had that account for 11 years
03-23-2017 , 11:32 AM
Nunes regrets briefing Trump before Intelligence panel

Spoiler:
03-23-2017 , 11:34 AM


gg RIP #neverforget
03-23-2017 , 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut


gg RIP #neverforget
03-23-2017 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
I expect the full extent of AHCA coverage will end up being a first aid kit delivered to your residence (shipping not included).

glgl

That's socialism. The republican plan would be to make sure first aid kits are AVAILABLE on the open market
03-23-2017 , 11:44 AM
Low cost patient driven first aid kits with 1 band aid, gauze, rubbing alcohol, super glue, and a used syringe at an affordable price of 299.99.
03-23-2017 , 11:46 AM
Can someone tell me why they can't just postpone the vote? WTF are they doing?
03-23-2017 , 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
Can someone tell me why they can't just postpone the vote? WTF are they doing?
They want to pass it before their constituents figure out what is in it and start complaining more.
03-23-2017 , 11:49 AM
The plan, I think, is to pass it out of the House and switch the "bad guys" from House GOPers to Senate Democrats
03-23-2017 , 11:52 AM
https://www.ft.com/content/5f667948-...b-53691a0c1347

Filibuster incoming.

Edit: Google the title and you can read it for free.
03-23-2017 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
The plan, I think, is to pass it out of the House and switch the "bad guys" from House GOPers to Senate Democrats
A curious strategy, because they still will have their names on a yes vote for a massively unpopular piece of legislation about which people will eventually learn.
03-23-2017 , 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
A curious strategy, because they still will have their names on a yes vote for a massively unpopular piece of legislation about which people will eventually learn.
Doesn't matter, they'll blame someone else for all the bad parts and they'll get away with it as they always do.

Or it fails and nobody remembers this by 2018 anyway.
03-23-2017 , 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
They want to pass it before their constituents figure out what is in it and start complaining more.
That + I believe today is the 7th anniversary of the passage of ACA and they want to pass a much worse bill specifically on this historic day because history.
03-23-2017 , 11:59 AM
Also there's another recess on April 12, which means town halls. Those are going to be intense.
03-23-2017 , 12:01 PM
what time would the vote be?
03-23-2017 , 12:03 PM
As of this morning I believe the vote wasn't listed on the schedule yet. So probably late tonight if it happens today.
03-23-2017 , 12:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWillow
https://www.ft.com/content/5f667948-...b-53691a0c1347

Filibuster incoming.

Edit: Google the title and you can read it for free.
great news. i called both of my senators today (both dems) and told them to vote no/filibuster and require the GOP to go nuclear and that if the reporting about a possible deal between dems/mcconnell was true, how disappointing it was to hear that and if they should have learned a single thing over the last several decades it's that republicans are not as principled as they'd like people to believe and this would result in ANOTHER case of that.
03-23-2017 , 12:32 PM
England, if you're listening... I hope you can find Rex Tillerson's missing emails.

Exxon Probably 'Lost' Those Secret Rex Tillerson Emails, They're Figuring It Out
03-23-2017 , 12:40 PM
dems filibuster, republicans nuke then pull gorsuch for much worse for the ownage.

then everyone goes back to lol'ing dems.
03-23-2017 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by m_reed05


Lol this ought to be good.
that guy is on another level, and sounds guilty as ****.
03-23-2017 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
dems filibuster, republicans nuke then pull gorsuch for much worse for the ownage.

then everyone goes back to lol'ing dems.
can't be worse than Scalia
03-23-2017 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
dems filibuster, republicans nuke then pull gorsuch for much worse for the ownage.

then everyone goes back to lol'ing dems.
Worse how?
03-23-2017 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parlay Slow
Worse how?
radicals, trump's kids, who knows they'll find a way. There are no qualifications so he could put literally anyone on there.
03-23-2017 , 12:58 PM
They won't pull Gorsuch, wtf are you saying?

      
m