Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I think this is where the left is being unfair. Let me preface this comment by saying **** Ryan for his cowardly and immoral support of Trump but I don't think it is fair to pretend he is trying to purposely hurt people.
The sane right (of which there are ever dwindling numbers) has a fair point about entitlements. They are simply not sustainable forever. Something has to be done to manage them so they are available for future generations. I disagree with how they are doing so, but the left is often disingenuous when they act like entitlements can grow forever with no impact on the economy.
This is a very difficult and serious conversation that should be occurring and is not helped by cheap shots on either end of the political spectrum.
I'm not sure about that.
Quote:
This is a very difficult and serious conversation that should be occurring and is not helped by cheap shots on either end of the political spectrum.
is all that is happening. You're trying to suss out some serious philosopher king discussion out of the welfare queens, useless drug testing, and "lazy poors" discussion? Let's go to the article.
Quote:
Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Ryan, said that the new approach would be a better one for beneficiaries. “Sending back to the states lets each one tailor a system to its needs ― some states have much higher elderly populations, while others have more young, poor for example ― and by eliminating federal red tape, more physicians and hospitals will actually accept patients on Medicaid,” said Buck.
But states already have significant flexibility in how to administer Medicaid. (The House bill may be amended to allow states to implement work requirements to Medicaid, but the result there would merely be to shrink roles, not provide more coverage.)
Wow, it's almost like Paul Ryan is lying here. Buy why would Paul Ryan be lying if we're trying to have serious discussion?
Quote:
It’s what Ryan calls “patient centered.” If a patient can afford health care, he or she can choose to purchase it, or not. If a patient can’t afford it, well, that’s what children and charity are for.
“Either you believe in your principles, or you don’t. And our principles are, we should have a free market in health care,” Ryan said on Hewitt’s show. “We have the opportunity of going with patient-centered care, where you buy what you want to buy, and if you don’t want to buy something, you don’t buy it. That’s freedom. That’s the market. That’s what we’re proposing.”
Now as someone who follows healthcare, that's not what 'patient centered healthcare' is. 'Patient centered healthcare' has to do with care once the patient is in the healthcare system and a kind of organizing principle. Paul Ryan is using the phrase because it sounds nice in order to push for a proposal he wants. In other words, he's lying
So in that article we have Paul Ryan lying multiple times. In fact, he's lied almost the entirety of this bill order to try and get it passed. Why? Well he's explicit. It's not some philosopher king discussion about trade offs and entitlements, it's about tax cuts for the rich.
So I'm not scoring cheap political points when I think Paul Ryan is being a craven liar in order to get a bill passed so that he can give money to the rich.
If you want to argue that perhaps Paul Ryan has a worldview were he thinks doing so will help the poor, or at least is indifferent to their suffering on moral grounds, then conceded. We can probably go as far as to say that that worldview means he thinks he has to lie constantly in order to make it happen.
Last edited by Huehuecoyotl; 03-21-2017 at 11:10 AM.