Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-20-2017 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
The American right wants nobody to have kids and no immigration. It's as if they don't understand macro economics at all. Oh wait.
No, they want everyone to have kids, they just don't give a **** about helping pay for them.

Last edited by otatop; 03-20-2017 at 10:02 AM. Reason: maybe not everyone but at least all the white everyones...
03-20-2017 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I've been running a company in Canada for decade where we give one year leave and have never heard of a woman "manipulating" it whatever the hell that would even mean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
If this was even a thing (which its not) it wouldn't matter to the company. We don't pay their salary while on leave. The state does.

The American right wants nobody to have kids and no immigration. It's as if they don't understand macro economics at all. Oh wait.
Did you see my post where I suggested that your Canadian understanding of right-left and fiscal conservatism may never have been the same as the American understanding?
03-20-2017 , 10:18 AM
Looking forward to Trump live tweeting this hearing.
03-20-2017 , 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Mason Malmuth?
Best Wishes,
03-20-2017 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
Well if there is one thing holding USA #1 back, it's definitely some companies voluntarily offering maternity benefits.

How does this **** even make sense in their brains?
Remember that they want to go back to the time when America was great. AKA the 1950's. So, they're against anything that makes it easier for women to do anything other than stay at home, raise children, clean the house, and shut the **** up and let the men do the talking.
03-20-2017 , 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
On a side note it should be pointed out that the premise that women "take advantage of" maturity leave with the implication that these women are cheating companies is only because maternity leave benefit currently goes through individual employers at their discretion. If the benefit were to go through the state then the disruption to the individual company would be minimal and women wouldn't be taking advantage of it any more than someone claiming a mortgage interest deduction is.
03-20-2017 , 10:51 AM
edit: wrong thread

Last edited by +rep_lol; 03-20-2017 at 11:04 AM.
03-20-2017 , 11:06 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/20/politi...ing/index.html

"investigating alleged collusion" headline all over the place. im sure i am a slow pony i have been working and havent read the last 25 posts.

1 time!
03-20-2017 , 11:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFS
Remember that they want to go back to the time when America was great. AKA the 1950's. So, they're against anything that makes it easier for women to do anything other than stay at home, raise children, clean the house, and shut the **** up and let the men do the talking.
I think you may need to go back a bit further to when women couldn't vote. ****ing liberal women giving Trump second place in the popular vote.
03-20-2017 , 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
I'm in NYC. It occurred to me yesterday that this place would absolutely terrify your average Trump voter. There are not only minorities everywhere, many of them speak different languages! And you can't press one for English!
I have seen multiple times , (guys from concealed carry states im guessing) , reach for their gun (which is not there obviously because of our laws) holster , when undesirables (to them) are walking their way .. hilarious to see the panic in their eyes. enjoy your stay, even though its cold as hell.
03-20-2017 , 11:51 AM
Greenwald just arguing with people about him calling democrats mcarthites and pretty much ignoring reality.

He has reached full blown stooge.
03-20-2017 , 11:53 AM
Mark off "whatabout Hillary" on your intel committe hearing bingo cards.
03-20-2017 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
I know you are banned for being a silly goose but when you return put up or shut up on media sources. I will take the Washington Post and you can choose any other news entity on the planet as it relates to 2017 American problems, DC centric.

Just blasting sources as fake news or being biased while never ever having to provide what one would consider a credible or reliable source.

It never happens though because just like Trump supporters with Whataboutism or Republicans and actual policy discussion their only moves are to deflect and attack. Never providing anything of substance or worthy of debate. Then we get the sad faces because people won't play the stupid games with them.

The next intelligent defense of the AHCA on any level I read will be the first one. So don't talk about policy because it means you have to take responsibility. It's one of my peeves with some non voters because some simply don't vote because they don't want to be responsible.

After no policy we just say all media is horrible and biased and slanted and fake. The ONLY counter source presented with a straight face is Trump himself which just causes things to self combust because you can't have a legitimate discussion on anything with someone who can't recognize Trump as the lyingist liar in liarstan.

So we don't talk policy, we don't actually have any sources of information we use outside of memes because they are too easily discredited. Then we just bring up Obama or Clinton when things get too hot. Not sure why people don't understand why we get indignant after we do all these things because nobody treats us seriously. I mean we could act like adults but still...
Just go to Wapo's website. It's embarrasing. If you MUST have sources from me that I have a modicum of respect for, I would go with Reuters & AP. Compare Reuters home page (US section obv) to Wapo's, for Christ's sake. One is professional and one is clearly rabid activist.

And, if you are looking for a defense of AHCA from me, you will be disappointed. As presently constituted, it's garbage.

Last edited by lew189; 03-20-2017 at 12:00 PM. Reason: Forgot AHCA
03-20-2017 , 11:58 AM



https://mobile.twitter.com/mirandaya...51413230903296
03-20-2017 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Perhaps you could also show us proof of liberal bias in the NYT?
I really hope this is a joke.
03-20-2017 , 12:13 PM


https://mobile.twitter.com/FullFront...48918651887616
03-20-2017 , 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
Just go to Wapo's website. It's embarrasing. If you MUST have sources from me that I have a modicum of respect for, I would go with Reuters & AP. Compare Reuters home page (US section obv) to Wapo's, for Christ's sake. One is professional and one is clearly rabid activist.

And, if you are looking for a defense of AHCA from me, you will be disappointed. As presently constituted, it's garbage.
Lol so you have no sources of information but claim everything you don't agree with is biased. You couldn't be more intellectually ignorant if you actively pursued it as a full time career.
03-20-2017 , 12:28 PM
03-20-2017 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Lol so you have no sources of information but claim everything you don't agree with is biased. You couldn't be more intellectually ignorant if you actively pursued it as a full time career.
Do you not see what fallacy you are guilty of? Where did I claim everything I don't agree with is biased? I specifically said that I'm not a big fan of a few news sources that I think are biased overall, not that everything they've ever written is wrong. That would be a pretty silly position to take. I am many things, but I don't think I can agree to being "intellectually ignorant." I am intellectually curious, if anything.

Last edited by lew189; 03-20-2017 at 12:38 PM. Reason: Grammar
03-20-2017 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Greenwald just arguing with people about him calling democrats mcarthites and pretty much ignoring reality.

He has reached full blown stooge.


Oh yeah, waow, so unreasonable
03-20-2017 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
I really hope this is a joke.
You claimed an ACLU article wasn't a proper source without reading it. You can't prove bias in either case. Go for it though. Try an honest debate.
03-20-2017 , 12:46 PM
statement from the morons at the white house

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/20/politi...fSrc=permalink

From CNN's Noah Gray:

A White House official says FBI Director Comey's statement that the Justice Department is investigating Russia/Trump collusion doesn't change anything.

"Nothing has changed. Senior Obama intelligence officials have gone on record to confirm there is no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion and there is no evidence of a Trump-Russia scandal," the White House official said.

"Obama's CIA director said so. Obama's Director of National Intelligence said so. We take them at their word," the official said
03-20-2017 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
Just go to Wapo's website. It's embarrasing. If you MUST have sources from me that I have a modicum of respect for, I would go with Reuters & AP. Compare Reuters home page (US section obv) to Wapo's, for Christ's sake. One is professional and one is clearly rabid activist.

And, if you are looking for a defense of AHCA from me, you will be disappointed. As presently constituted, it's garbage.
Tell us, do you think everyone in the US should have affordable health insurance?
03-20-2017 , 12:54 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/

FBI Director James B. Comey also acknowledged the existence of a counterintelligence investigation into the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election, and said that probe extends to the nature of any links between Trump campaign associates and the Russian government. The acknowledgment was an unusual move, given that the FBI’s practice is not to confirm the existence of ongoing investigations.
03-20-2017 , 12:54 PM
The Russian Times twitter feed is pretty funny today.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RT_America

      
m