Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-18-2017 , 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Oh god another one has shown up.
Aren't you sick of the same 20 posters posting the same bull**** over and over again?
03-18-2017 , 10:34 PM
And you think the average person who comes from a family that can afford 5 figures a year are just morons? You don't have to be a genius to get an English degree, but the average student is smarter than the average person who doesn't go to university. Anyone who has spent time around normal teenagers recently knows this is common sense.

Lew, we would LOVE if you posted a thorough smack down of the aclu. Go ahead, we're waiting!
03-18-2017 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
Aren't you sick of the same 20 posters posting the same bull**** over and over again?
Well, since you dropped in all you've basically done is scream "Fake news! Fake news!" like how a small child or 45* would respond to being told they have to eat their meat before they get any pudding.
03-18-2017 , 10:37 PM
We need a thread for settling the debate on the relative "smartness" of college students. Park it right next to the "is programming art?" thread.
03-18-2017 , 10:37 PM
Why don't you just get to the good parts and tell us whether 1) we should try to make it so that more smart people are able to attend college (like lowering costs somehow) or 2) we should just shun universities for being liberal indoctrination think tanks? Will be easier if we skip the rest of the discussion.
03-18-2017 , 10:38 PM
I love when posters like Sushy see a post they don't like, think "Aha! This is a gotcha question! I'll show them!", then post "Citation please" only to have it backfire when 10 sources are given within 5 minutes. Then they slink off and reappear in 3-4 days to do it all over again.
03-18-2017 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
There's nothing a Trumper could hate more than the ACLU.

Trumpers are unAmerican, uncivil, against liberties and against unions.
Lol. Yes, I'm sure all of that is right on...
03-18-2017 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
Lol. Yes, I'm sure all of that is right on...
You keep saying the ACLU is not reputable. Please show and explain why you think this.
03-18-2017 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
You keep saying the ACLU is not reputable. Please show and explain why you think this.
You think he is capable of actual honest discussion? You're about to be disappointed! He will not address any problems with the ACLU link. This is a lock.
03-18-2017 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggymike
Why don't you just get to the good parts and tell us whether 1) we should try to make it so that more smart people are able to attend college (like lowering costs somehow) or 2) we should just shun universities for being liberal indoctrination think tanks? Will be easier if we skip the rest of the discussion.
1.) I think there are already plenty of mechanisms for smart people to find their way to college.
2.) I don't think I ever said anything about shunning universities for being liberal indoctrination think tanks. That was certainly not my experience and I don't think it is the case. That having been said, I think anyone would agree that 80%+ of educators, in general, are wildly liberal. That is for the same reason that coal miners are likely 80%+ wildly conservative, though...
03-18-2017 , 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
1.) I think there are already plenty of mechanisms for smart people to find their way to college.
2.) I don't think I ever said anything about shunning universities for being liberal indoctrination think tanks. That was certainly not my experience and I don't think it is the case. That having been said, I think anyone would agree that 80%+ of educators, in general, are wildly liberal. That is for the same reason that coal miners are likely 80%+ wildly conservative, though...
Which do you think, on average (of course), are likely to be more independent in their thinking (meaning not as influenced by the people around them, without reason other than to fit in or whatever)?
03-18-2017 , 10:50 PM
It's absolutely great when they give it away within a half dozen of posts every single time.
03-18-2017 , 10:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
You think he is capable of actual honest discussion? You're about to be disappointed! He will not address any problems with the ACLU link. This is a lock.
Oh yea, I know. It's almost like he's skipping over those posts and doesn't see them!
03-18-2017 , 10:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
You think he is capable of actual honest discussion? You're about to be disappointed! He will not address any problems with the ACLU link. This is a lock.
I didn't read the link, so it's not fair to address it. As to the ACLU, in general, I'm not going to sit here and blast it, I just don't have a ton of respect for it as an unbiased source of info. I would lump it in with the NYT and WAPO, lol. Those entities aren't all "fake news" but they are clearly and demonstrably slanted and if you can't see that, I won't waste my time trying to prove it to you, because it wouldn't be possible.
03-18-2017 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
It's absolutely great when they give it away within a half dozen of posts every single time.
Who is "they?" I am one person. A rock. An island.
03-18-2017 , 10:53 PM
This is not a criticism of any post and more of a criticism of general trends of public discourse.

I find that in general there is too much focus on intelligence when discussing education and not enough focus on discipline and practice.
03-18-2017 , 10:54 PM
Maybe you could read a source before discrediting it? That would be a novel idea that your fellow intellectuals at University probably would have thought to do!

Stone lock that he couldn't muster any refutation of the link and wouldn't try. Absolutely pathetic.

Lew, if the NYT, the organization that had five separate stories about EMAILZ on the front two pages the Friday before the election is slanted for liberals, what is not slanted iyo?
03-18-2017 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
Which do you think, on average (of course), are likely to be more independent in their thinking (meaning not as influenced by the people around them, without reason other than to fit in or whatever)?
I would say, on average, that would be the educator. What does that prove?
03-18-2017 , 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by amoeba
This is not a criticism of any post and more of a criticism of general trends of public discourse.

I find that in general there is too much focus on intelligence when discussing education and not enough focus on discipline and practice.
Agreed. Well said.
03-18-2017 , 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
I didn't read the link, so it's not fair to address it. As to the ACLU, in general, I'm not going to sit here and blast it, I just don't have a ton of respect for it as an unbiased source of info. I would lump it in with the NYT and WAPO, lol. Those entities aren't all "fake news" but they are clearly and demonstrably slanted and if you can't see that, I won't waste my time trying to prove it to you, because it wouldn't be possible.
OK, so ACLU, NYT and WAPO are all not credible in your view.

Can you list a few sources that you think are credible?
03-18-2017 , 10:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
Aren't you sick of the same 20 posters posting the same bull**** over and over again?
If a single one of you would come in and engage in intelligent debate I would be extatic. It has yet to occur.
03-18-2017 , 10:57 PM
Perhaps you could also show us proof of liberal bias in the NYT? I've showed you an example of non liberal bias already that has not aged well!

Why is it hard for you to read a source before deciding the credibility of the source?
03-18-2017 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Maybe you could read a source before discrediting it? That would be a novel idea that your fellow intellectuals at University probably would have thought to do!

Stone lock that he couldn't muster any refutation of the link and wouldn't try. Absolutely pathetic.
"He?" I'm right here. I just told you I didn't read the link and I won't. There are plenty of important things to read, I apologize if I'm not going to read a link shared by Einbert, who I think should probably be institutionalize at this point. Guy hasn't been off 2+2 for more than 5 minutes since the election...
03-18-2017 , 11:00 PM
That's not true. I went to the grocery store the other day.
03-18-2017 , 11:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson
OK, so ACLU, NYT and WAPO are all not credible in your view.

Can you list a few sources that you think are credible?
I will let you know when I find them. I'm afraid for your collective psyches if I post the first ones that come to mind.

      
m