That is my point? not many centrists gonna be left after 18 when the remaining centrists dems all get primary outed in the senate and losing all those seats to R's because those far leftists are all stupid. R's seriously can get to 60 so Dems are gonna have to focus all energy into flipping the house or the worst **** toward voter suppression and all that is gonna go down.

Really we need everybody act like rational human beings but that'll never happen. Partisan voters eat that COMMUNIST mantra and wherever all that nonsense came from. Then they see HITLER in return which is overblown even though I do believe some of them up there are essentially nazis. Trump is more of a richest in his bias than he is a racist tho which is why he might still end up much closer to Putin. A chance at the combo of both though I suppose.

*shrugs* Currently, I don't believe the investigation is gonna ensnare trump which will make people mad, but I think someone's gonna go down which will make people mad. (I don't know if I want a dem to go down in it or not for the lols) Either way, the butthurt should be incredible. Too many people hoping for a silver bullet b/c it's the instant gratification generation. There is still a chance trump simply wanted to be his BFF and russia just wanted to **** with us rather than any collusion.

So much focus on meals on wheels is a great distraction for trump budget as it keeps focus away from everything else and meals wasn't gonna die off anyway as it has other funding. Another "see your outrage was overblown" freebie to trump supporters. The left likes to do that a fair bit for no reason other than the standard lack of awareness.

Why don't you just tell us about your stance on the less fortunate. Some of your posts have been complete drivel. Not sure what you're trying to accomplish in this thread.

My posts advocating negative income tax (which seems clearly better than a minimum wage law that sometimes would hurt the unskilled.)

My comments regarding why he needs his kids around. (To explain stuff to him.)

There are plenty more.

And when I do sort of defend Trump it is usually by saying that he is actually a lot more liberal than his rhetoric, and the people around him. People who manipulate him, and who may well be more deserving of your torture fantasies.

Your actions betray what your words don't want to

You have a super secret sauce solution for the poor but somehow you always end up supporting those who want to dismantle the current safety net because HAY GUYZ YOU HAVE TO DISMANTLE FIRST BEFORE YOU DO THE REAL HELP even though nobody is going to enact your bull****

I am in favor of a net worth tax on multimillionaires that helps anyone who has even a half decent reason to be in trouble. The only people I have no sympathy for are those people who in high school not only thought learning math was dumb but who made fun of those who felt otherwise. It is really only them who I want to see suffer a little.

GUYS, I LOVE THE POOR

IT JUST NEVER REACHES A HIGHER PRIORITY THAN TRIVIAL BULL****

I THINKS THE POOR SHOULD HELPS THEMSELVESSSSS

If someone can define the "less fortunate" I mean as a measurable standard instead of a generality then I'm on board. But when the dem machine hits the streets to sign as many people up on welfare as possible to justify a budget (I mean you cant cut handouts right??!)...come the fk on.

The social utopia for Skanskly is everyone with a mathematics degree.

Sklansky doesn't have a math degree, right? He's all precal in all his "analysis" of everything so I ****ing hope he doesn't

You are literally describing Trump and his people. He wants to cut every science and data program funded by government. Can you really be this obtuse?

It's shocking you have built a career as some kind of logic guru. You are downright terrible at basic principals of logic.

DEMS
DOOOOOOOOOOO
IT
TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


HastenDan you ****ing voted for Trump, you got more upset about Richard Spencer getting punched than Medicaid getting cut, you've never fooled anyone

David you notice how when it was time for making black people second class citizens you were ALL ABOUT thought experiments about how it might could be justified, but now that somebody insulted the Presidential candidate you allegedly didn't support you're all emotionally involved?


For someone who knows how to play poker you have no ****ing self control about these tells.

dudes gonna get guested itt

The guy advocates torturing family members of "terrorists". I, personally, wouldn't cry.

SERRRR MORCH 4 DA TILLERUNT LAFFFFFT

This reads as if you were bullied at school for being good at maths and still want revenge.

Wishing suffering on the huge number of people who made fun of maths students at school when they were just kids (in my year that was the majority of boys) is orders of magnitude worse than wishing suffering and even death on a malignant and highly dangerous political leader.

Also, you never went past high school RE: MATHS

Sorry bro

Guys! How dare you say mean things about trump. The real evil in this world are those that didn't care about math in high school! Nerdy white math guys have it worse than the blacks, gall darnit! Show THEM your empathy!!!!

What thought experiments? What emotionally involved? I don't care what happens to Trump.

I KNOW I am describing Trump and his people. And it doesn't bother me AT ALL that you want to see him suffer. It appears though that many of his cohorts deserve it more.

(As far as logic, the LSAT is pretty much a logic test if you want to gamble on it.)

Actually that's true. When the US had a much higher standard of living the world's smartest gravitated toward us. Now that this isn't so much true we will be soon swallowed by those countries whose high school students want to get smart, unless we change our ways soon.

"I don't like to pay taxes"

We don't have to guess about your stance. It's crystal clear from the battles you pick and the transgressions you ignore.

According to wikipedia, he doesn't have one.

Don't let Sklansky give mathematicians a bad name. His opinion and style of delivery are not representative of mathematicians, at least not any that I know. He is an auto didact with an outsized chip on his shoulder. That is the prism through which his posts should be viewed.

Think the board is wrong calling Sklansky a Trump supporter. You can think back e.g. to him posting poll results to say "look at how stupid Trump supporters are."

Every Sklansky post, no matter how cryptic - and some are so cryptic as to raise the question whether he's ever read human writing - you should be asking yourself how it relates back to the mantra them stupid, me smart. This will clear up a lot for you.