Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Question for those ripping Maddow, and I agree she could have done better, but I don't think it was as bad as some are saying. So, question:
You're a prominent liberal commentator and you are offered a leaked copy of Trump's 2005 1040 that doesn't show much. You suspect Trump's team leaked it to control the media narrative. How do you handle it?
Keep in mind if you pass on it, CNN will run a 48 hour countdown clock and Wolf Blitzer will sensationalize like crazy... or Fox will run it and say it proves we don't need to see any other returns and Trump is the greatest businessman ever.
Also keep in mind that you will get crossover viewers that will never watch you otherwise, and have no idea how deep the Russian connections go.
Do you possibly hype it, stuff it toward the back of the show and open by explaining the Russian stuff in depth to people who need to know?
I missed it live and only saw the 10 minute segment on the 1040, but by reading the thread that's what she did. Maybe not perfectly, but perhaps strategically it was a pretty smart move?
The responsible thing to do would not be to promote it like they are dr. Phil instead of an alleged news show. Then on the show she could have brought it up and discussed what it does and does not mean.
The backlash would be zero, she would get the credit for being the first to go to air with it but not in a media whore way.
This isn't a Maddow problem this is an all media problem. The game has changed and this is not jerry springer or the local news I-Team investigating black mold during sweeps.
I will likely never purposefully watch Maddow again, which is no big deal I didn't before. However with other credibility I had felt she was building up had I heard she got this and discussed it on her show with some integrity and no barking and countdown timers I probably would have had an even higher opinion of her. I probably wouldn't even be bitter about the first 17 minutes of the show which were a waste of time.
I just want those journalists who want to be identified as such to start acting like it. People defending the tweet just being a tweet are being disingeniius. Those tweets are designed to do EXACTLY what that one did and if they could trick people like that every day they would.