Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-15-2017 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Please for the love of god everyone stop with this 4D chess bull****. They are grossly incompetent not Machiavelli.
Trump's personality is a master of getting people to hate others. He's a complete moron in a lot of aspects. Dunno whether it's fortunate or unfortunate yet he's incredibly impatient. He thinks about scheming a lot so some of this is due to that, hence people getting confused since he also likes to improvise and do random stupid ****.

They will back down but you gotta force them to. Also they will not rise up when needed. They will come at anyone who ever said one sentence bad about them like a pack of rabid dogs, I dunno how america is gonna survive 4 years of this much less 8 or whatever, I mean they'll survive but america won't look like america that's for sure. He's gonna try to do everything he said the first time as soon as he can get away with it.

Also his personality does not joke. They're incapable of it.

Or at least that was my experience with my own life, so far it's been the exact same damn thing out of trump. Needless to say, I'm very against this.

tl;dr WAAF.

Last edited by wheatrich; 03-15-2017 at 09:39 PM.
03-15-2017 , 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BooLoo
in two months this administration has turned the country into the laughing stock of the world...
In fairness, there are plenty of signs that nationalism/populism are alive and well in other developed countries. True colors are starting to show everywhere.
03-15-2017 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron81
Muslim Ban 1.1 stayed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockfsh
Waiting for Trump's tweets
Obama did "911" and Hillary flew the planes. SICK and BAD people!!
03-15-2017 , 09:35 PM
03-15-2017 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
BMOL spot on. The judges aren't expected to try to figure out the original intent of laws. That would be absurd lefty nonsense.
03-15-2017 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Please for the love of god everyone stop with this 4D chess bull****. They are grossly incompetent not Machiavelli.
these things are not written by actual legitimate idiots. they may be stupid in a relative sense to the sort of people who normally help come up with EOs, but don't convince yourself that they are dumber than the average american or are incompetent. they are literally in the white house right now.

it is incomprehensible to me that anyone who could be involved with writing the 2nd one could have read the judicial opinions on the first and gone "oh yep this 2nd one definitely clears up all the issues"

please stop with your "gross incompetence all the time no matter what" ****.

it's sad that you think what i suggested rises to the level of 4d chess. you need to readjust your standards a bit.
03-15-2017 , 09:39 PM
If Trump's goal was to actually ban Muslims, instead of getting applause from racists, does he actually need a written, public executive order? Can't he just have Tillerson (or more likely Jared) just call up the embassies in whatever nations and tell them to stick all the visa applications in a drawer for a while. If he does it quietly like this, he doesn't get the praise he craves (which I suspect is at least half of his reason for wanting a Muslim ban of some sort. Of course there is a generous helping of true bigotry that goes with it), but it would have a similar effect.

How would that play out?
03-15-2017 , 09:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson
If Trump's goal was to actually ban Muslims, instead of getting applause from racists, does he actually need a written, public executive order? Can't he just have Tillerson (or more likely Jared) just call up the embassies in whatever nations and tell them to stick all the visa applications in a drawer for a while.

How would that play out?
All they're going to end up doing is vetting everyone to an absurd extent and nobody will end up getting admitted. It wouldn't have come to that but the refusal of these idiots to abide by normal law and reason is going to lead to that. The Dems also don't realize the more they pull this crap the more votes they lose from the middle
03-15-2017 , 09:45 PM
among other things Trump eliminating Meals on Wheels. Food for seniors. Screw them though.
03-15-2017 , 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
All they're going to end up doing is vetting everyone to an absurd extent and nobody will end up getting admitted. It wouldn't have come to that but the refusal of these idiots to abide by normal law and reason is going to lead to that. The Dems also don't realize the more they pull this crap the more votes they lose from the middle
What have the Dems done?

You are doing an impressive job tonight looking totally and utterly clueless.
03-15-2017 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
All they're going to end up doing is vetting everyone to an absurd extent and nobody will end up getting admitted. It wouldn't have come to that but the refusal of these idiots to abide by normal law and reason is going to lead to that. The Dems also don't realize the more they pull this crap the more votes they lose from the middle
BMOL,

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
How can he read Trump's mind? He knows for sure this is a Muslim ban because he went off the rails a few times during the campaign trail. And as I said and even numerous lawyers have said on any major news network. Judges are only allowed to be reviewing what is in the order and if it's legal, not why it was written
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
what lawyer have you heard, and on what major news network other than Fox, say this?
Still struggling to come up with that answer from earlier?

Last edited by ymmv; 03-15-2017 at 09:48 PM. Reason: If you just want to admit you were lying, that's cool.
03-15-2017 , 09:58 PM
A familiar sequence...

Troll: But logically this can't happen because reasons. Please concede my authority on the matter.

Experts: No, you have no idea what you're talking about. Consider X, Y, and Z. Z particularly disproves your claim.

Others: Lol Troll.

Troll: Well if you carry on like this you're gonna lose more votes forever. You can tell by the seething tone and rapid pace of my posts that I genuinely believe I'm witnessing my opponents' downfall. My reaction is consistent with the belief that my rivals have lost the game.
03-15-2017 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
these things are not written by actual legitimate idiots. they may be stupid in a relative sense to the sort of people who normally help come up with EOs, but don't convince yourself that they are dumber than the average american or are incompetent. they are literally in the white house right now.

it is incomprehensible to me that anyone who could be involved with writing the 2nd one could have read the judicial opinions on the first and gone "oh yep this 2nd one definitely clears up all the issues"

please stop with your "gross incompetence all the time no matter what" ****.

it's sad that you think what i suggested rises to the level of 4d chess. you need to readjust your standards a bit.
This isn't a great point. If a doctor ****s up a routine procedure and like, forgets a sponge inside you the defense of "they did a better job than the average American would" isn't very solid.
03-15-2017 , 10:01 PM
It's the Dems fault that there's a ban

Nice
03-15-2017 , 10:08 PM
Bmol, literally every trump policy is unpopular with "the middle." I'd love for you to cite otherwise!
03-15-2017 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Ok, this judge is awesome:
Quote:
The Government need not fear. The remarkable facts at issue here require no such impermissible inquiry.

Last edited by suzzer99; 03-15-2017 at 10:16 PM.
03-15-2017 , 10:15 PM
Laurence O'Donnell making a good point... imagine if Obama had publicly accused GWB of tapping his phones, with zero evidence to support it... impeachment proceedings would already be underway.

Trump has somehow managed to act so erratically and irrationally, that he can seemingly get away with anything. It's all explained away as just "Trump being Trump".

He needs to be impeached. Clearly unfit for the office.
03-15-2017 , 10:21 PM
Nunes and Schiff Looked like someone shot their dogs today after being briefed on Russia stuff. I'm going to dip into my strategic popcorn reserves for this testimony next week.
03-15-2017 , 10:24 PM
I mean, I've heard that before, and it all amounted to nothing
03-15-2017 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
This isn't a great point. If a doctor ****s up a routine procedure and like, forgets a sponge inside you the defense of "they did a better job than the average American would" isn't very solid.
right, but the guy is coming up with a false dichotomy of "machiavelli" vs "gross incompetence"
03-15-2017 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
Laurence O'Donnell making a good point... imagine if Obama had publicly accused GWB of tapping his phones, with zero evidence to support it... impeachment proceedings would already be underway.

Trump has somehow managed to act so erratically and irrationally, that he can seemingly get away with anything. It's all explained away as just "Trump being Trump".

He needs to be impeached. Clearly unfit for the office.
That's usually the way it is. I've worked with people who are total characters and in general they can get away with saying things someone who is usually quieter and more level headed cannot get away with it because if they say it people take them seriously
03-15-2017 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
All they're going to end up doing is vetting everyone to an absurd extent and nobody will end up getting admitted. It wouldn't have come to that but the refusal of these idiots to abide by normal law and reason is going to lead to that. The Dems also don't realize the more they pull this crap the more votes they lose from the middle
AFAIK this is already semi happening. There are reports of Muslims are getting rejected for visas for seemingly little to no reason or they are being refused entry into the US if they have a visa.
03-15-2017 , 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
I mean, I've heard that before, and it all amounted to nothing
The IC has not gone public on Trump/Russia yet so not sure what your talking about.
03-15-2017 , 10:39 PM
Wasn't Comey supposed to say something today? People itt suggested as much yesterday.
03-15-2017 , 10:41 PM
So is Trump going to see them in court or is he going to ***** out again?

      
m