And this would be immediately leaked, no?

should just shoot them a letter via snail mail around October 2020

And people wonder why the comedy profession is dominated by the left

Ive never once heard anyone ever wonder that.

Still got time to edit your post.

It's just two pages of a 1040 it's not like he's on tape saying he assaults women

McMaster, who was supposed to check Trump, got overuled by Bannon and Kushner to keep a Flynn acolyte in the NSA

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...verrule-236065

Jeff Sessions lied under oath. How is he still Attorney General? Republicans should really be calling for him to resign. Too bad they don't give a damn about the truth or the country.

y'all need to settle down, this wasn't publicized for any considerable time and afaik it was never claimed that they had some bombshell that was going to sink him. the whole point of this seems to be to pre-emptively strike on the AMT issue when GOP starts tax reform (something that would undoubtedly be slipped in quietly and go unnoticed to most), and to apply more pressure on the issue of his tax returns. also is the first reporting wrt robolovyevolov or whatever his name is that i've seen on network TV

Rachel maddow show is good imo, also her ratings have been through the roof lately surpassing certain fox programs. She is not desperate for ratings she's on an upswing atm

i can't believe rachel betrayed me by doing her show again tonight

I think trump self leaked

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/s...33345604583424

John.miller@gmail.com

What happens if someone, maybe an ex-assistant or an ex-accountant, who has read a lot of the "King of Fool's" tax returns publicly reveals the significant issues (Russian involvement, bankruptcy, failed deals, payoffs, etc) that he remembers from memory in the returns, but he doesn't leak the actual returns? Is he at criminal legal risk? Doing that wouldn't be as strong as a real leak but it would put some pressure on the King.

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/...ock-msnbc.html

He or someone on his team clearly did this; cherry-picked a specific year that looks good for him with no controversy to it.

It had to be leaked by Trump himself, right? His 1040 says nothing that people were asking about. And it says the one thing that Trump wants everyone to know: He's rich.

2nd page had client copy stamped on it, so was either him or someone he knows.

So much fail itt tonight.

1) of course this is a story for all the reasons she laid out,

2) she never claimed to have all his returns for decades,

3) this is the first time we have seen any returns,

4) there is so much tin foil hat 4chan thinking itt with all the nonsense about trump self leaking. There is zero evidence of this.

5) Maddow is a stellar journalist and one of the people most fighting against Trump yet this thread is now calling her a fraud for doing her job and promoting this story, which of course every single media entity on earth would have done.

6) it is possible trump has paid significant taxes every year.

Maddow with the Jar Jar Binks reveal. Top troll.

If this is Maddow fighting against Trump she needs to stop. Now.

This was unequivocally good for Trump.

So what she should not report this because they are supposedly favourable to trump?

We only want to see returns if they are bad for him?