Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

01-27-2017 , 05:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Well that's heartening: a person who doesn't believe truth and reason are worth fighting for because they perceive their opponent as being alien to both of them. What a bankrupt philosophy that is. I worry this diseased mindset is widespread.

I only just found out what WAAF means.

WAAF
01-27-2017 , 06:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
still havent found an intelligent form of life that voted Trump
This is probably as good as it's gonna get:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=6614


Quote:
I voted Trump. *tomatoes*

Pretty damning after all that **** I just wrote. But the fact is I'm completely disenchanted with the political system as it stands. It's a never ending cycle of the same jackasses retaining office year after year, and the same sort of a very select few of completely **** candidates that we get to fight each other over every 4 years for the presidency.

The only reason everybody is content is because we live in one of the most fortunate countries in the world. Terrible decisions and obvious corruption simply don't affect us to a huge degree, so keeping the ridiculousness going is not a terrible move at this point. I get that. I just think we can do better.

Yeah, protest vote. No denying it. No way to prove it, but I hovered over all three options (I think there was a libertarian option, anyway) before casting the vote, then went on to vote anti-incumbent (including against Johnny "real republican" isakson), except for a couple of lesser offices that I thought were legitimately doing a good job.

Isakson went on to win with 60% of the vote, and my Trump vote had as much effect, but that's neither here nor there.

I didn't watch the election proceedings. I woke up to find out who won, unenthusiastically, because i was going to be disappointed either way.

The real kick in the nuts to me was that the republicans have a strong hold on the presidency, house, and senate. I am not happy about that to say the least. If I had considered that possibility, I would've voted differently.
Ineedaride2 is offline Report Post
01-27-2017 , 08:37 AM
It has not been stressed enough how much of a must-read this is:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trans...ry?id=45047602
01-27-2017 , 08:43 AM
Someone needs to produce a border wall - safe space meme.
01-27-2017 , 09:36 AM
Trumps latest Tweet (I'm too dumb to embed it)


"Look forward to seeing final results of VoteStand. Gregg Phillips and crew say at least 3,000,000 votes were illegal. We must do better!"


Seems like Votestand is an app where people claim anything (eg a black person looked shifty and looked similar to another person who had already voted - also they voted Dem, obv). Really, it seems to work just like that. And the POTUS is Tweeting about this "evidence".
01-27-2017 , 09:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTD
Trumps latest Tweet (I'm too dumb to embed it)


"Look forward to seeing final results of VoteStand. Gregg Phillips and crew say at least 3,000,000 votes were illegal. We must do better!"


Seems like Votestand is an app where people claim anything (eg a black person looked shifty and looked similar to another person who had already voted - also they voted Dem, obv). Really, it seems to work just like that. And the POTUS is Tweeting about this "evidence".
The founder of the app

Quote:
While Phillips is re-emerging in the news following Trump's tweet Sunday, Texans may be more familiar with his tenure as an executive deputy commissioner at the state's Health and Human Services Commission.*According*to his LinkedIn profile, he*held the position from March 2003 to August 2004, playing a big role in shaping the 2003 bill to privatize large parts of the state's social safety net.

By 2005, Phillips was beset with allegations of cronyism stemming from contracts*signed at both HHSC and the Texas Workforce Commission. At the time, a*Houston Chronicle investigation*found he helped craft the privatization legislation in a way in which he personally profited along with a private consultant.
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/11...ent=1485523789
01-27-2017 , 09:50 AM
He sounds like the sort of person that Trump can relate to, his sort of citizen.
01-27-2017 , 09:50 AM
Its not only that he thinks three million + people voted illegally, but that he didn't get a single one of those votes that kinda confirms he's over the edge.
01-27-2017 , 09:58 AM
Honestly, when I think what politicians and sportspeople and Tweeted to get in trouble in the UK this is just mind-bending. If I had a 14 year old kid who acted like this I'd be embarrassed, but this is the POTUS.
01-27-2017 , 10:16 AM
I wonder if at some point Trump is going to completely disconnect from his administration and be a figurehead while everybody else does the work for him. Every once in a while, Trump stops watching CNN to give a planned speech to talk about something good or blame somebody for that good thing not happening to make it look like he is in power when he's really just mainlining CNN in the Oval Office 24/7.
01-27-2017 , 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTD
He sounds like the sort of person that Trump can relate to, his sort of citizen.
The thing is the app's "findings" was only one tweet but it got amped up by InfoWars which is most likely were President of the Free World and Most Powerful Person in the World got his information. He's getting his information from InfoWars. He's getting his information from InfoWars. You kind of have to repeat it over and over again to let it sink in.
01-27-2017 , 10:27 AM
This whole Trump is unhinged thing going on in this thread reminds me a lot of the "Trump is going to pull out of the race by the end of the month" we saw each and every month of the campaign.

Obviously he is unhinged but he isn't any more so than he was in the campaign. He is basically doing and acting exactly the same way he has since he announced his campaign. The fact everyone is alarmed he didn't magically turn into a classy and intelligent guy shows just how jaded we are towards politicians and the honesty with which they campaign. Granted Trump is completely dishonest also but in a different way. He meant what he said in his campaign clearly but just surrounded it with lies that were tangent to the promises.
01-27-2017 , 10:32 AM
I knew of this Alex Jones from Youtube and TV clips before knowing he was the main Infowars guy (I'd resisted viewing the pages for my sanity's sake). I'd just assumed he was some lunatic with about 1000 people following his Youbtube channel.

I mean, what's next, something to do with chemtrails? Or perhaps he'll try to stop vaccinations. I'm not ruling anything out.
01-27-2017 , 10:36 AM
As a Brit it's hugely, Bigly, embarrassing that the un-elected bureaucrat is the first leader to meet him.

Talk about wanting to live on your knees rather than die on your feet.

****ing coward.
01-27-2017 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTD
I knew of this Alex Jones from Youtube and TV clips before knowing he was the main Infowars guy (I'd resisted viewing the pages for my sanity's sake). I'd just assumed he was some lunatic with about 1000 people following his Youbtube channel.

I mean, what's next, something to do with chemtrails? Or perhaps he'll try to stop vaccinations. I'm not ruling anything out.
Well I guess you missed this article friend. http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...science-2017-1
01-27-2017 , 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWillow
As a Brit it's hugely, Bigly, embarrassing that the un-elected bureaucrat is the first leader to meet him.

Talk about wanting to live on your knees rather than die on your feet.

****ing coward.
Honestly Trump is so dense and easily manipulated that I support May going over there to grab some free loot for britain before putin gets his share.

Hopefully in the midst of the collapsing government we're too small for the smart conniving people to worry about and she'll get to neogtiate bigly with Trump one on one. After Brexit we need all the help we can get. Tricking trump into a speedy "fantastic deal" might hold us over until we can sort out our brexit mess.

The only concern is she might catch Blair syndrome and become a Trump lackey in which case we're totally ****ed. I'm assuming she's smart enough to just take the money and run.

Last edited by tomdemaine; 01-27-2017 at 10:54 AM.
01-27-2017 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
The thing is the app's "findings" was only one tweet but it got amped up by InfoWars which is most likely were President of the Free World and Most Powerful Person in the World got his information. He's getting his information from InfoWars. He's getting his information from InfoWars. You kind of have to repeat it over and over again to let it sink in.
What's the big deal, they're a credential WH press corps organization.
01-27-2017 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by amurophil
Well I guess you missed this article friend. http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...science-2017-1
Jesus Christ
01-27-2017 , 11:00 AM
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-li.../2870449?snl=1

This whole thing reminds me of this
01-27-2017 , 11:02 AM
Just to clutter up the threat with useless data, I think some people mentioned actuarial tables and death rates.

Well, using typical life tables for a UK pension scheme for relatively well paid pensioners who retired in normal heath the probs you get are around:

Death prob before age 74 (starting at 70) ~ 4.2%
Death prob before age 78 (starting at 70) ~ 10.5%
Average life expectancy from age 70 # 89 years.

Obviously everyone has their own expectation, and it is always subjective. If he has no known conditions, and I recall something about his paid for doc saying he's the fittest ever POTUS or something, then he may be expected to do better. Then again, it's a stressful job for most people and there is always the extra chance of being assassinated.

I'd think that poor health may be more likely than death, but then again he's so arrogant he probably thinks he can run the county from his bed.
01-27-2017 , 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
I will at some point. I suffer from anxiety, am not doing great today, and am prone to absorbing the moods of others. I don't particularly want some unhinged idiot gabbling at me.

I think this has been said already, but if the Wall is to be paid for by what is essentially a 20% tariff on Mexican imports, one of the many results will be a downturn in the Mexican economy, which is liable to increase undocumented emigration to the US. It would be doubleplus ironic if the effect of the Wall was to increase illegal immigration.
pretty sure that right now illegal immigration is at a net of 0 or less. so ya, that would be pretty likely.
01-27-2017 , 11:13 AM
If he can destroy the crony capitalism from within as remove power of the government as suggested by the great Milton Friedman, he can create an economic boom.

He is self funding and able to say no to Adelson etc. who bought and lobbied the UIGEA.

Of course he has to be tougher than others if he wants yo survive from the bigoteer media. Romney and McCAIN look really moderate now, but back then they were women hating klan members thanks to bigoteer narratives of media democrats.
01-27-2017 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kypreanus
If he can destroy the crony capitalism from within as remove power of the government as suggested by the great Milton Friedman, he can create an economic boom.

He is self funding and able to say no to Adelson etc. who bought and lobbied the UIGEA.

Of course he has to be tougher than others if he wants yo survive from the bigoteer media. Romney and McCAIN look really moderate now, but back then they were women hating klan members thanks to bigoteer narratives of media democrats.
Have you travelled here from 12 months ago?
01-27-2017 , 11:28 AM
Yeah he's basically stocking his cabinet with cronies and completely unqualified people, so that's already a dead narrative. Sweet hot take
01-27-2017 , 11:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacktheDumb
I saw it and it basically tells us that people are stupid, which is a age old insight. And there is nothing at stake for them by lying about inauguration numbers. I agree that some are to far gone, you do always have those. But there is also the human tendency to abandoned loyalty as soon as things go south. This is survival instinct.

The point i wanted to make yesterday is this: Democracy is at stake, if convincing some bullheads might save it, it might be worth a try.
ya, I just dont think there is any way to convince these ppl. but I do agree that democracy is at stake, tho I dont think there is any way to save that it. so, if we actually want to live in a reasonable and comfortable and profitable society then there will need to be drastic measures taken.

      
m