Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-06-2017 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Since argument by anecdote is apparently completely acceptable when it comes to immigrants and crime, I leave you with this

Rest of world is just straight up laughing at us. Like, HOW IS THIS NOT AN ONION HEADLINE HOLY ****.
03-06-2017 , 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by th14
Manmohan Singh was Prime Minister of India from 2004-2014, he's Sikh; in their 2011 census India was 79.8% Hindu, 14.2% Muslim, 2.3% Christian, 1.7% Sikh
Fair enough. But perhaps this is the exception that proves the rule.
03-06-2017 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Fair enough. But perhaps this is the exception that proves the rule.
That's not a thing, that's not how that works

Thanks for popping in here with your stringent logic tho
03-06-2017 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Not by law, no. In practice?

Do you see where I am going with this?
I'm not disagreeing with you.
03-06-2017 , 09:36 PM
I would like to respectfully suggest that anyone who is "respectful" of someone else's religion and yet critical of their political ideals in the trump era (for lack of facts and logic) is a hypocrite.

To quote H.L. Mencken - "I respect the other fellow's politics and religion in the sense and to the extent that I respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart".
03-06-2017 , 09:37 PM
GOP ACA repeal and replace released.

Reading.

Edit: Appears pony is slow and we are discussing it in the Obamacare thread.
03-06-2017 , 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I would like to respectfully suggest that anyone who is "respectful" of someone else's religion and yet critical of their political ideals in the trump era (for lack of facts and logic) is a hypocrite.

To quote H.L. Mencken - "I respect the other fellow's politics and religion in the sense and to the extent that I respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart".
I would like to respectfully suggest that this is dumb. Supporting pro-choice candidates/judges now apparently means I can't be respectful towards someone who disagrees with me solely because of their religion?

Cmon man. Those are basically the only opponents to such a policy I CAN respect.

Like, I still think it is insane and not based in reality, but what is your suggestion - I start telling my grandparents how stupid christianity is for leading them to a pro-life conclusion? Always gonna respect religious beliefs.

Just to be clear, OTOH, that I will criticize the church nonstop for espousing literally the exact same views.
03-06-2017 , 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
I'm an everyday Joe in an ultra-blue Northeast state. I've had people explode in anger on the spot on multiple occasions for my mere mentioning of the fact that I don't believe in God.
How often does this come up and how?!
03-06-2017 , 09:49 PM
This ****ing idiot also doesn't know what vetting means. Jesus ****ing Christ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by truefish
Have any of you people ever been to an Islamic country? I've spent years in them. Islamic/Muslim ideology does not mesh with western civilization. I'm not talking about the moderate Muslim who is born in the west. People from the Middle East is who I am talking about. I think the vetting process should be 5 years. Any disciplined scum bag that intends to do harm on the USA can behave for a year or two.

A nation of immigrants argument again? Get off it.
03-06-2017 , 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
I would like to respectfully suggest that this is dumb. Supporting pro-choice candidates/judges now apparently means I can't be respectful towards someone who disagrees with me solely because of their religion?

Cmon man. Those are basically the only opponents to such a policy I CAN respect.

Like, I still think it is insane and not based in reality, but what is your suggestion - I start telling my grandparents how stupid christianity is for leading them to a pro-life conclusion? Always gonna respect religious beliefs.

Just to be clear, OTOH, that I will criticize the church nonstop for espousing literally the exact same views.
Quote:

I can't be respectful towards someone who disagrees with me solely because of their religion
Quote:

I can't be respectful towards someone who disagrees with me solely because of religion
.
03-06-2017 , 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
I do agree in practice, but why can't they go and visit them instead (since they can come back just fine now)? Look, we can do this all day. I can go into whataboutism and ask you why that people who want to kill us should have a right to just come over and do that, it's not a hill politically you want to stand on--nobody's gonna support you if an attack happens.

...
Is this parody?
03-06-2017 , 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
.
You're gonna have to elaborate, considering that I posed that in the form of a question.

You understand that 2 people of the same religion can have wildly different views right? Like, my grandma has been a gay marriage advocate for decades, and yet Mike Pence thinks a gay person needs shock therapy. They read the same exact bible and came to 2 wildly different conclusions.

If the church itself comes out and says "gay marriage is a sin" I absolutely will rail against them, just like my grandma would.

Sorry, gonna go ahead and keep respecting her religious beliefs.
03-06-2017 , 10:01 PM
I imagine most recent Presidents are as religious as the majority of their constituents - not very, despite putting on airs. Then there's the subset of radically religious folks to which Pence belongs, whose main connection to faith is restricting abortions and rights to gay people.
03-06-2017 , 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
You're gonna have to elaborate, considering that I posed that in the form of a question.

You understand that 2 people of the same religion can have wildly different views right? Like, my grandma has been a gay marriage advocate for decades, and yet Mike Pence thinks a gay person needs shock therapy. They read the same exact bible and came to 2 wildly different conclusions.

If the church itself comes out and says "gay marriage is a sin" I absolutely will rail against them, just like my grandma would.

Sorry, gonna go ahead and keep respecting her religious beliefs.
I think religion is a disease that stunts critical thinking, logic, and rational discourse. So yes, I understand that people of different religions can have two different views. I just don't care about either of them unless they have logic and a rational argument to back them up.

Edit: Or people of the same religion having different views. The point stands - whoever your imaginary friend is, you're an adult now. Act like one.

Last edited by d2_e4; 03-06-2017 at 10:16 PM. Reason: grammar, typos
03-06-2017 , 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
C'mon. What he really believes is irrelevant; he pretends to be religious just enough to keep his moron-filled base happy. He'd have been dead in the water on day one if he'd gone anywhere near either of the bolded words.

I'm an everyday Joe in an ultra-blue Northeast state. I've had people explode in anger on the spot on multiple occasions for my mere mentioning of the fact that I don't believe in God. What do you think happens to a guy during the primary process running for national office who does as much?

At no time soon will we have a true, out, open atheist or agnostic as President.
This. Anyone who denies that the US is not a semi-theocracy is delusional. Maybe this time, it's imagined, for sure, since you have a big fat liar in office. When was the last time a self-avowed atheist/agnostic (as Reagan put it - "not a citizen") was elected?

US has a big problem, and that is that the "separation of church and state" is a massive illusion. Once you fix that, the demagogues will drop off massively.
03-06-2017 , 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I think religion is a disease that stunts critical thinking, logic, and rational discourse.
Agreed (edit - not with the "disease" sentiment)

Quote:
So yes, I understand that people of different religions can have two different views. I just don't care about either of them unless they have logic and a rational argument to back them up.
OK this is completely different, but you WERE saying anyone who is respectful of religion while disagreeing politically is a hypocrite. guess I'm just one of those sheep who respects people's deeply held religious beliefs.

Quote:
Edit: Or people of the same religion having different views. The point stands - whoever your imaginary friend is, you're an adult now. Act like one.
I was raised atheist but I'm gonna just GUESS that if someone was raised in a very religious household, it's not quite as easy as turning 18 and realizing that a powerful church had been lying to you about topic XYZ.

Either way, and again can't believe that I have to say this, but I will absolutely respect their religious beliefs - which is TOTALLY different than respecting the points of view put out by the churches themselves.

Edit again - For example sticking w Pence: If he comes and tells me being gay is unnatural and shock therapy is the best thing ever, what I would do is give him actual reasons about why he is wrong. What i would NOT do is go "LOL CHRISTIANS U GUYS R DUMB FK UR RELIGION!" In that sense I can both respect his religious beliefs but disagree with him politically. Don't think that makes me a hypocrite but c'est la vie!

Last edited by ymmv; 03-06-2017 at 10:30 PM.
03-06-2017 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Whataboutism at work.

I didn't ask you what bothered you more. There are things that bother me more than the Syrian refugees who will die or be seriously injured due to the travel ban. I asked if it bothered you.

Add me to the group looking for a truefish ban.
Ah the good old "Why are we worrying about this when there are homeless veterans?"

Works for all occasions. As long as there is one homeless veteran no one else can ever be helped.
03-06-2017 , 10:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
Agreed (edit - not with the "disease" sentiment)



OK this is completely different, but you WERE saying anyone who is respectful of religion while disagreeing politically is a hypocrite. guess I'm just one of those sheep who respects people's deeply held religious beliefs.



I was raised atheist but I'm gonna just GUESS that if someone was raised in a very religious household, it's not quite as easy as turning 18 and realizing that a powerful church had been lying to you about topic XYZ.

Either way, and again can't believe that I have to say this, but I will absolutely respect their religious beliefs - which is TOTALLY different than respecting the points of view put out by the churches themselves.

Edit again - For example sticking w Pence: If he comes and tells me being gay is unnatural and shock therapy is the best thing ever, what I would do is give him actual reasons about why he is wrong. What i would NOT do is go "LOL CHRISTIANS U GUYS R DUMB FK UR RELIGION!" In that sense I can both respect his religious beliefs but disagree with him politically. Don't think that makes me a hypocrite but c'est la vie!
Replace where I said "religion" with "organised religion". Does that make any difference?

As to your points - you don't need to say what you say in caps there. You clearly think it anyway. Just have a think what it means when you say you "respect their religion".
03-06-2017 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Ah the good old "Why are we worrying about this when there are homeless veterans?"



Works for all occasions. As long as there is one homeless veteran no one else can ever be helped.

My mom pulled a "whatabout victims of tornados in the Midwest", as if by helping foreign refugees we were somehow ignoring or refusing to help those people. Weird how she, a Nee Jersey resident at the time, simultaneously forgot about how Republicans voted to deny funding for Hurricane Sandy relief. I would even consider her a true believer, that type of discourse has just permeated their entire mindset when it comes to political discussion.
03-06-2017 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grue
How often does this come up and how?!
Not all that often. Some people are fine with it. Most don't care.

As far as what I mentioned, one incident involved guys having a religious discussion about Sunday Mass at a decidedly right-wing card game I attended, where I didn't know all the people there that well, and someone involved in the discussion asking me if I attended services, followed by them flipping out and ranting about young people "losing their way" and being "indoctrinated by college".

Another consisted of a much older guy I work with who lives very close to me asking if I and my wife would like to join some Christian organization he belonged to. I politely declined. He asked me the same thing the next 10 times he saw me. I finally stated that I wasn't Christian, or anything, and thus wouldn't be interested in attending. Started muttering to himself about non-believers and how people's lives were empty without Christ, etc. Same guy months later decided to inform the women in our office that he wouldn't go to the beach because of the bikinis there are a continuation of sin caused by the snake causing Eve to realize she was naked. I'm not making this up.

My wife's mother belongs to a Reformist Church. As far as I can tell, they're progressive and accepting of the LGBTQ community, no issues with abortion or contraception, not Trump nuts, etc. However, she persists in constantly asking people to pray or attend Church despite fully knowing that those people have no interest/are atheists/both.
03-06-2017 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
This. Anyone who denies that the US is not a semi-theocracy is delusional. Maybe this time, it's imagined, for sure, since you have a big fat liar in office. When was the last time a self-avowed atheist/agnostic (as Reagan put it - "not a citizen") was elected?

US has a big problem, and that is that the "separation of church and state" is a massive illusion. Once you fix that, the demagogues will drop off massively.
Only one I could come up with:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyrste...#Personal_life
03-06-2017 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Thank you. I think I have prognosticated the root of your problem - this dirty atheist. QED
03-06-2017 , 10:59 PM
Lol @ anybody who is surprised at Ben Carson being a dolt.
03-06-2017 , 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Replace where I said "religion" with "organised religion". Does that make any difference?
Lol yes of course. You said "someone else's religion," not "organized religion" - again, reading the same book can result in people coming to extremely different conclusions. Hilarious to think that 1 of those is more right or wrong than the other and 1 of those people is more or less Christian/Muslim/Jewish/etc than the other person.

Quote:
As to your points - you don't need to say what you say in caps there. You clearly think it anyway. Just have a think what it means when you say you "respect their religion".
I respect the beliefs that they have based on their understanding of religious texts. That's what it means. Obv I don't think anything like "LOL CHRISTIANS U GUYS R DUMB FK UR RELIGION!" - that was expressed in the way it was to demonstrate how crazy such a sentiment would be. But that doesn't mean I can't think the church is a bad entity.

Sorry man I'm just not into the whole "discrimination based on ideology" thing when it comes to people's deeply held religious beliefs!
03-06-2017 , 11:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
Lol yes of course. You said "someone else's religion," not "organized religion" - again, reading the same book can result in people coming to extremely different conclusions. Hilarious to think that 1 of those is more right or wrong than the other and 1 of those people is more or less Christian/Muslim/Jewish/etc than the other person.



I respect the beliefs that they have based on their understanding of religious texts. That's what it means. Obv I don't think anything like "LOL CHRISTIANS U GUYS R DUMB FK UR RELIGION!" - that was expressed in the way it was to demonstrate how crazy such a sentiment would be. But that doesn't mean I can't think the church is a bad entity.

Sorry man I'm just not into the whole "discrimination based on ideology" thing when it comes to people's deeply held religious beliefs!
I just disagree with you completely. My opinion is pretty much this:

"LOL CHRISTIANS U GUYS R DUMB FK UR RELIGION!"

Substitute any religion you like for "CHRISTIANS".

      
m