Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Greenwald has anti-Trump articles including his most recent on how Trump used the Navy Seal guy's widow as propaganda. Van Jones has been an anti-Trump powerhouse.
That
piece is not remotely an anti-Trump piece. In fact, the main thrust of the article is that Trump's use of the widow for propaganda is completely normal for US presidents.
This is standard for Greenwald, who invariably uses all events, no matter how horrifying, as an opportunity to get on his high horse about hypocrisy in America. Trump botches a raid in Yemen and kills an 8 year old girl?
OBAMA DRONES BAD!. Trump bans Muslims?
Just a continuation of American rhetoric in the War on Terror. Conservative fake news wrecking the very foundation of public discourse?
LIBERALS DO IT TOOOOOO!
If you read nothing but Greenwald since November, you would think that the media were being hysterical about Russia, but you would also not even recognise that anything out of the ordinary was going on in the office of the POTUS, because Greenwald ties everything bad Trump does back to longstanding American policy. It is, of course, great to call out hypocrisy when it occurs. But when that's what you do EVERY ARTICLE, it becomes an exercise in obfuscation, both of morality and of causality. The fake news piece is a good example; why the **** is he writing an entire article about one isolated incident rather than engaging with the real world problem? Greenwald's fans appear to think this sort of attention-seeking contrarianism is the height of intellectual discourse.