Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-05-2017 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
I mean, yeah? Though that has nothing to do whatsoever with the point I was making? One is morons in the government using lax technological security and allowing those with ill intent easier access towards infiltration.

The other is state sponsored surveillance of a head of state of an ally and their government with our President condoning such actions.

Do you not understand the difference between the two? And why I might think your reply quoted above is not germane to the post in which you were replying to?
I understand the point you're making. The point I'm making is that yet again, noted liberal Dan is very against Obama/Clinton, but when Trump is doing those as dangerous/worse, we have to wring even the slightest comment out of you.
03-05-2017 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Lol if they repeal it costs go up for everyone and 10s of millions lose coverage.
The latter is true. The former is not.
03-05-2017 , 07:12 PM
Your reference to unsecured wifi and whatnot had zero to do with my post just stating that I assume everyone is being spied on to different degrees, and that the Obama administration spied on the communications of a head of state of an ally country.

Your attack on me has nothing to do with my post that prompted your reply.
03-05-2017 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sighsalot
John Schindler‏Verified account @20committee 7m7 minutes ago
More
@elkmating @LouiseMensch I love Louise but I was tech dir of #NSA's biggest operational division; my sources are very close to all this.

imo this is the reason for the wire tap story to begin with. He knows he is ****ED

as mentioned prior, I believe in a karmic way trump will be the one to out his own treason as i believe he did here
Yeah I think several people here noted trump's Saturday morning tweets had the feeling of a desperate drowning man.
03-05-2017 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
Except they don't know how.
They simply don't have 50 votes in the Senate to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
03-05-2017 , 07:16 PM
Tired of hearing the phrase deep state thrown around out there in the internet verse.

The only reason a "deep state" of IC unified against trump exists is because trump called them all nazis and kept pissing them off. Dip**** did it to himself.
03-05-2017 , 07:22 PM
"Deep state" just sounds like just another typical scary-sounding buzzphrase radio shows use to appeal to simpletons who don't really understand the political process but want to feel like they do. That's really the idea isn't it? Make some dumbass feel like they're able to see through the conspiracy and he's hooked for life and will tune in every day, maybe buy some water purifiers from you or whatever

Not sure if that's where it comes from or if it was lifted from something else but I have been hearing it a lot he last month or so.
03-05-2017 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak


So he's losing Drudge?
Read the comments in the FB link I posted. They literally think Comey has been in cahoots with Obama since before the election. It's insanity.
03-05-2017 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
The only reason a "deep state" of IC unified against trump exists is because trump called them all nazis and kept pissing them off. Dip**** did it to himself.
...or maybe they think his connections to Russia have him compromised and indebted to a hostile foreign power? I mean, I know we're all supposed to be super cynical about everything government-related, but there are a fair number of people who are honestly trying to do their job for all the right reasons.
03-05-2017 , 07:27 PM
03-05-2017 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
The latter is true. The former is not.
What do you think is going to happen when tens of millions of people lose their HC? Sick people still have to be treated. So when they go to the hospital, who pays it? The people that already have HC. How? Guess what happens to their premiums. They ain't gonna go down.
03-05-2017 , 07:39 PM
Somebody start the lol Comey thread

**** that guy
03-05-2017 , 07:42 PM
On the wild chance democracy survives 4 years

Bernie 2020!

03-05-2017 , 07:42 PM
Yeah I think it's Bernie, Biden or Bust in 2020. Or maybe Kander. Hopefully he runs for House rep in 2018.
03-05-2017 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Here is the problem: People inside the Democratic establishment and in the media are looking for a smoking gun, when many of the answers are in plain sight — in the posture of Russian state media, in the Wikileaks campaign, and beyond. Looking for a secret signal from the Trump camp to Russia to continue the hacking campaign? Why not look instead at Trump’s*public request*in mid-July that Russia hack Clinton’s email.

Seventeen US intelligence agencies, and lots of*good reporting, said Russia meddled in the US election via its hacks of the DNC and Clinton staffers as well as a disinformation campaign. All but one (the NSA)*concluded*this was in the service of trying to get Trump elected.

The Russian cyberattack of 2016 was widely documented, but what's happening now is that some of Trump's critics are turning the fabric of diplomacy into conspiracy. They're trying to find evidence that it was his camp that directed those hacks, rather than investigating how they originated in Russia. Of course, it’s also important to examine potential ties between Trump, his advisers, and Russia — if, for no other reason than no one has yet found a good explanation for Trump's, worship of Putin and Russia. But, at the end of the day, it’s Russia that hacked the US, in its drive to sow chaos in a country it sees as its rival, and to elect a friendly leader who would both pass amenable policies (like the potential lifting of sanctions) while*feeding that very chaos.

Russia pulled off one of the greatest coups in history — and it’s getting away with it.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder...VvE#.norR2rxE0
03-05-2017 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
I think it's plausible that the Trump team told Comey they were going to tell the press he was SITTING ON THIS INFORMATION TO HELP HILLARY ZOMG and so Comey took what he thought was the least damaging path for the FBI's credibility. Because Comey knew what they were putting together against Trump, and knew that if Trump got elected, they needed that credibility to avert disaster.
i believe this. we know for a fact that a faction within the fbi is hyperpartisan right wing and close friends with rudy giuliani. if the director kept shtum and it leaked out, it would look bad. well, it would have looked bad before this trump disaster
03-05-2017 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
No offense, but this story is an asinine conspiracy theory and really has no place here.
If that's the standard for what's allowed in this thread then we shouldn't allow any tweets from trump or from any of his staff.
03-05-2017 , 07:54 PM
Will the fbi faction that was actively trying to torpedo Hillary now turn on Trump or on Comey?

As inexplicable as Comey's actions were right before the election, and I do think it was probably enough to swing the election, I'm glad Trump can't appoint his own FBI director. At least not without running comey out of office, which now would be another enormous scandal.
03-05-2017 , 07:55 PM
We need a special prosecutor. This is all too big and Congress is too tainted. There has to be a special prosecutor immediately.
03-05-2017 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Comey is asking the Justice Department to call Trump out on his BS about the wire tapps.

Mr. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/u...e-iphone-share
I think this would be a good time to explain how a wiretap actually works, as a prosecutor who has actually done wiretaps, because if you understand how a wiretap is done you understand how ****ing ludicrous trump's claim is and how every republican congressperson who has ever been a prosecutor or defense attorney knows its ludicrous:

Wiretaps are not done like in spy movies where somebody physically goes to someone's house (or in this case trump tower) and places some kind of "bug." A wiretap is done by a prosecutor, either state or federal, pursuing a legal application pursuant to 28 USC 2703 and some other federal and state statutes (depending on whether its a state prosecutor or a federal prosecutor), wherein the prosecutor presents an application to a judge that there is essentially probable cause to believe a crime has been committed, that evidence of the crime will be discovered by monitoring communications, that it can be done narrowly, and a few other odds and ends that I am leaving out for brevity. Once that application is approved by a judge, the prosecutor then sends the signed wiretap/trap & trace order to the phone company and the phone company installs a device on their line to allow the law enforcement agency to monitor the communications. . So the idea that Obama himself, somehow "tapped" Trump's phones is ****ing ludicrous, it's simply not how it works.
03-05-2017 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Trump's critics are turning the fabric of diplomacy into conspiracy
And Trump's supporters are turning the fabric of national security into conspiracy

WAAF
03-05-2017 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by m_reed05
Will the fbi faction that was actively trying to torpedo Hillary now turn on Trump or on Comey?

As inexplicable as Comey's actions were right before the election, and I do think it was probably enough to swing the election, I'm glad Trump can't appoint his own FBI director. At least not without running comey out of office, which now would be another enormous scandal.
well, maybe being fbi guys, after the election and after hearing about the trump team being investigated and all these leaks about connections, i'd think their fbi patriotic instincts would kick in and if not support investigations be reasonable about allowing them to go on. but then i remember they read clinton cash and were VERY fired up about it so it's possible they read brightbart daily like jeff sessions does, so who knows who these people are.
03-05-2017 , 08:08 PM
I've completely lost faith that 95+% of elected officials, non-elected govt employees, or the country in general have "patriotic instincts". Any that may have existed have been completely supplanted by tribal mysideism.
03-05-2017 , 08:11 PM
Patriotism is partisanship
03-05-2017 , 08:16 PM
Rubio seemed pretty reasonable just now

      
m