A lot, and yes.

Okay so we agree on something, laws do matter. Agreeing on that, what do you think of this?


https://twitter.com/RepSpeier/status/837687226473525248

Either way, Hillary was the more popular candidate. More people, by volume, wanted her over trump. Yeah, she still lost. People still wanted her more than Comrad trump.

What does that have to do with anything? Ridiculous argument. So I broke one law then its ok for someone else to break another? Two wrongs make a right, huh?

This is the kind of response a criminal would give.

trump spamming now.Sad!

You mean the handful of lurid crimes pumped out by your right-wing media outlets that make you think there's some kind of epidemic? Dylan Roof found a site that did the same thing with black crimes and decided to start a race war. You can do the same for pretty much any group.

It's about utility vs. risk. Some of us don't think it's fair to destroy the lives of millions of people, most of whom are obviously not here to murder anyone, over a tiny fraction that commit heinous crimes.

Much the same as how your side won't even consider the most basic common sense gun legislation - despite all the Sandy Hooks in the world - because the utility or 2nd amendment or whatever reasons.

That's a yes. What was the law, when did you break it, and what is your home address?

You have an Obama bashing thread on here? Yea there might be a jab here and there but I guarantee it's not to this magnitude.

I agree with you, two wrongs don't make a right! So Sessions should resign as AG for perjury, correct?

I really hope you never drift into the far lane when making a turn.

If you got a blowjob in Missouri in the 80s it was illegal.

In Rhode Island it's illegal to throw pickle juice on a trolley: http://www.dumblaws.com/laws/united-states/rhode-island

Laws man.

You're a good Christian, I take it?

C´mon on dude, you are around on the internet long enough to know that engaging in a discussion with the guy is a waste of time.

There are plenty. The fact that you haven't looked doesn't make it false.

I'm not a lawyer, and tdlr. But if he broke the law he should be held accountable.

Most of the folks being deported have criminal backgrounds. If you are against that then there is no point in talking about it. My family lives in Southern California and that area is decimated by the illegal immigration problem.

He's not going to be arresting white people smoking pot

I heard an interesting perspective by John Fugelsang this morning on the podcast Fake the Nation. He talked about how during the Obama Presidency, every time a mass shooting occurred the NRA would send out mass emails to their mailing lists. The email would always be the same--"Obama is going to take away your guns due to the recent mass shooting!" Then gun sales would spike for a while, and everybody would forget about it until the next mass shooting. Rinse and repeat. So these gun makers and the NRA are literally making money off of every mass shooting, while NRA members actual policy viewpoints tend to line up with the Democratic party (regulation, background checks, etc. while keeping guns legal). But the propaganda is strong by the NRA and there is a LOT of money to be made on these mass shootings, so the status quo remains.

I have a feeling you don't apply this same line of logic to gun manufacturers and owners

I'm an atheist. The belief in God is a mental illness much like liberalism. I see problems and think with common sense. You all think with your emotions. Big difference.

No because Obama didn't target people who were obviously no danger to society. We're bitching for the same reason you're doing ecstatic backflips.

Also you never answered the question about DREAMers. Brought here as an infant - deport or no?

I don't have a problem with common sense gun laws. I own one gun. Don't lump me in with the rednecks.

No I don't think you get to get over the border and squat a kid out to get to stay and suck off of our social programs. Even if "dreamer" is a nifty little term.

How about some logical comparisons. Because there is one stupid law then they're all stupid? You're still picking and choosing.

That isn't what I said. If you lump all immigrants in with immigrants that kill people, you must lump all gun owners (yourself included) together when a gun owner kills someone.