Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Whether it actually was perjury or not is debatable imo.
If you look at the specific context of the questions I don't think it is clearcut that he lied. Or at least he didn't lie intentionally. It appears he may have misunderstood the intent of the question.
LOL.
So he should be let off the hook because he gave an answer to a question he didn't understand?
He was under oath talking to Congress. He's not spilling his guts to a bartender at the local watering hole.
If he's not capable of understanding questions from Congress, then he isn't qualified for the job.