Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-28-2017 , 01:36 PM
I mean, I know you probably won't, but you should.
02-28-2017 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
You can bad talk Trump, but if I watch 20 minutes of CNN a week and even I know what you're saying is false, maybe you guys need to branch out and stop reading blog posts that just confirm what you already believe for your news?

I recommend a healthy mix of AP/Reuters/CNN(or other FAKE LAMESTREAM OBAMA news media outlet)/Reason/Intercept.
I don't believe anyone ever said that Trump never mentioned the attacks on Jewish cemeteries & bomb threats at all, just that he was absurdly slow in doing it. Not to mention the responses basically had to be pried out of him by reporters.

This is not "false," and you should stop ****ing lying.

These attacks have been ramping up since the first of the year and it took WEEKS for the WH to respond. ****ing IVANKA took to twitter to condemn them before her idiot daddy for ****'s sake. When Trump was asked about them with Bibi standing right ****ing next to him his response was something something I did really well in the Electoral College.

This isn't hard for people who aren't completely ****ing brainless dude
02-28-2017 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
I don't believe anyone ever said that Trump never mentioned the attacks on Jewish cemeteries & bomb threats at all, just that he was absurdly slow in doing it. Not to mention the responses basically had to be pried out of him by reporters.

This is not "false," and you should stop ****ing lying.
I mean, you're wrong? But rather than show you the post I'm going to let you find it on your own because that's how you build character.

Oh also, calm down. Jesus, you people need to get a grip. Frothing at the mouth over a post on the internet...Yikes.
02-28-2017 , 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
I don't believe anyone ever said that Trump never mentioned the attacks on Jewish cemeteries & bomb threats at all, just that he was absurdly slow in doing it. Not to mention the responses basically had to be pried out of him by reporters.

This is not "false," and you should stop ****ing lying.

These attacks have been ramping up since the first of the year and it took WEEKS for the WH to respond. ****ing IVANKA took to twitter to condemn them before her idiot daddy for ****'s sake. When Trump was asked about them with Bibi standing right ****ing next to him his response was something something I did really well in the Electoral College.

This isn't hard for people who aren't completely ****ing brainless dude
02-28-2017 , 01:52 PM
02-28-2017 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroPimpin
Ryan is saying Trump and Russia needs to be looked at. Is that anything or just bs?
He wants it looked at by the intelligence committee whose chairman just yesterday hosted a press conference about how there is no evidence at all and there's nothing to see here
02-28-2017 , 02:03 PM
So I got a letter from the White House today:

TONIGHT President Donald J. Trump will step up to the Speaker’s rostrum and give his first address to a Joint Session of Congress and to all of America.  

You won’t want to miss this historic event. To see it live, you can go to https://www.whitehouse.gov.

You can also follow the address on Twitter @WhiteHouse and @POTUS, or by visiting the White House Facebook.

The address begins at 9 p.m.

There is still time to take our Joint Address Issues Survey and let us know your thoughts on how to Make America Great Again.

Be sure to tune in tonight!


I clicked on the Survey link and this is what I got:

1) WHICH ACCOMPLISHMENT(S) DO YOU CONSIDER THE MOST SIGNIFICANT OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SO FAR?

Select All That Apply:

a. Withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
b. Reviving key job-creating energy projects such as the Keystone Pipeline
c. Directing the Department of Defense to develop a plan to defeat ISIS
d. Enacting regulatory reform to begin to dismantle Obama-era, job-killing regulations
e. Implementing Executive Orders that focus on reducing crime, restoring public safety, dismantling transnational criminal organizations, and protecting our brave law enforcement officials
f. Minimizing the burden of Obamacare, while clearing a path toward repeal and replace
g. Creating the United States-Canada Council for Women Entrepreneurs and Business Leaders
h. Negotiating with companies to bring thousands of jobs back to America
i. Nominating Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court
j. Working with over 30 foreign leaders to discuss shared security concerns and solutions


I was overwhelmed with all the winning Trump has done, I just didn't know where to start. There was also this:

2) WHAT ISSUE(S) DO YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION TO FOCUS ON?

Select All That Apply:

a. Budget
b. Taxes
c. Jobs
d. Reducing Regulations
e. National Security and Fighting ISIS
f. Repeal and Replace Obamacare
g. Domestic Security and Fighting Crime
h. Education
i. Immigration Reform
j. Veteran Affairs
k. Energy and Environment
l. Government Reform


Then there was this question:

WHAT ARE YOUR IDEAS TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN?

There was also an additional comments section.
02-28-2017 , 02:06 PM
Please tell him "retire bitch" in the comments
02-28-2017 , 02:10 PM
more selective postings, no surprises.

This was on NY Times - don't you people even read that anymore? Are you seriously devoid of any actual sources of news that aren't chain emails?

02-28-2017 , 02:11 PM
am I a slow pony from skimming through or?

Quote:
Top House conservatives would vote against draft Obamacare repeal bill
MJ Lee
By MJ Lee, CNN National Politics Reporter
Updated 11:53 AM ET, Tue February 28, 2017
02-28-2017 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
To tie this in with Mike Tracey's(Tracey, if you're unfamiliar, is probably the most visible Twitter Paul->Bernie->Trump "opponent" who only criticized Clinton guy) recent twitter meltdown over the media inventing anti-semitism to push a narrative....

All that goldbug/anti-fiat money stuff was the gateway content to learning about the Rothschild's and ****, all the Soros stuff was just rebranding the Protocols of Zion, the last 5-10 years of the "paleocon"/Infowars wing has been increasingly fraught with anti-Semitic undertones that finally surfaced last year.

The Ron Paul revolution was like a breeding ground for some really scary ****, and in retrospect if anything we were all too charitable about the newsletters.
Maybe the supporters are the same (they have always been around long before Ron Paul), but the policies would have been very different.

If you can channel all the racists and crazies into getting behind a guy who is pretty staunchly anti-police and anti-military, that sounds like a win in my book.
02-28-2017 , 02:13 PM
02-28-2017 , 02:17 PM
Yeah that's dated a week ago

lol General Slow
02-28-2017 , 02:20 PM
02-28-2017 , 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Pot = "We must follow federal law"

Trans toilets, gay wedding cakes = "STATES RIGHTS STATES RIGHTS STATES RIGHTS ARGHBLARGH"
02-28-2017 , 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
Are you seriously devoid of any actual sources of news that aren't chain emails?
lols like this are why I keep you unignored.
02-28-2017 , 02:24 PM
Do we really need to quibble about whether Trump is anti-semitic when he picked Bannon for his Chief Strategist? It's pretty obvious he is. And you kind of have to wonder about any person who claims to defend civil liberties and then carries water for Trump. It's almost like conservatism isn't about civil liberties at all these days, but instead about authoritarianism + white supremacy.
02-28-2017 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Alex.
Maybe the supporters are the same (they have always been around long before Ron Paul), but the policies would have been very different.

If you can channel all the racists and crazies into getting behind a guy who is pretty staunchly anti-police and anti-military, that sounds like a win in my book.
I think you would've been very surprised at how "anti-police" a Ron Paul administration would've turned out
02-28-2017 , 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Do we really need to quibble about whether Trump is anti-semitic when he picked Bannon for his Chief Strategist? It's pretty obvious he is. And you kind of have to wonder about any person who claims to defend civil liberties and then carries water for Trump. It's almost like conservatism isn't about civil liberties at all these days, but instead about authoritarianism + white supremacy.
It's almost like trump isn't a conservative.
02-28-2017 , 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
I think you would've been very surprised at how "anti-police" a Ron Paul administration would've turned out
02-28-2017 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
I mean, you're wrong? But rather than show you the post I'm going to let you find it on your own because that's how you build character.

Oh also, calm down. Jesus, you people need to get a grip. Frothing at the mouth over a post on the internet...Yikes.
We come here to froth about Trump, what are you doing here? Getting off telling people "don't worry, be happy" like you're Bobby McFarrin?
02-28-2017 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sylar
It's almost like trump isn't a conservative.
Trump is absolutely a conservative. Conservatives just like to say that he's not because he's more revealing about it than others with more decorum. But Paul Ryan, Jeff Sessions, Mitch McConnell, they all wanted to implement the authoritarian + white supremacist policy agenda long before Trump came along. He's as conservative as conservative gets.
02-28-2017 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
lols like this are why I keep you unignored.
I don't think he's stupid or unintelligent in any way...but it's fairly obvious that he's just trolling this thread with stupid at this point. Like it provides plausible deniability or something, "Well maybe we should just read along respectfully because there is always the possibility that we're dealing with an idiot here who can't read," or something idk
02-28-2017 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
I'm told that we should relax because there is no proof that Ron Paul is aware of the existence of this obviously racist racism here so thanks for playing bub
02-28-2017 , 02:33 PM
That was way back in 1992 and the "conservative movement" was already spewing very white supremacist, very authoritarian propaganda. Read those several paragraphs carefully, you change a few of the phrases (change Communist Party and WWP to Globalists and Black Lives Matter movements) and you can pretty much put that in a Donald Trump newsletter or stump speech today. The conservative movement IS white supremacism.

      
m