Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-26-2017 , 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12




Bilden withdrew his name

Spicer is just a complete clown
Spicer is such a hack.

I would feel soulless if I was in his shoes.

He just says the opposite of what the media says.
02-26-2017 , 08:40 PM
FACTUAL NEWS
02-26-2017 , 08:41 PM
Anyone else think Putin might just be starting to regret installing an unpredictable maniac as the head of government for the only country on earth that can obliterate his country in a nuclear firestorm?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/25/politi...nal/index.html

Quote:
In the immediate aftermath of the Trump interview, Russian politicians allied with President Vladimir Putin reacted to the US President's comments with alarm, according to Reuters.
Many Russians had been hoping that Trump's praise of Moscow would mean friendlier relations between the two countries. Reuters quoted the chairman of the international affairs committee in the upper house of the Russian parliament saying that if Trump's campaign slogan, "Make America great again," means nuclear supremacy, it "will return the world to the worst times of the arms race in the '50s and '60s."
02-26-2017 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredd-bird
http://ijr.com/2017/02/810965-trump-...e-is-watching/

Inside Trump's Secret Dinner: A Side of the President You Don't Ever See





Obviously fake news because anonymous sources.
Well done steak with ketchup. This ****ing guy is evil.
02-26-2017 , 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sylar
Why on earth would you eat steak with catsup?
have you seen his apartment? trump has taste for ****e
02-26-2017 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Well done steak with ketchup. This ****ing guy is evil.
He's the ****head customer from the end of Waiting, he just tips better.
02-26-2017 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Anyone else think Putin might just be starting to regret installing an unpredictable maniac as the head of government for the only country on earth that can obliterate his country in a nuclear firestorm?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/25/politi...nal/index.html
If that's the case, though, wouldn't it make sense for them to quietly leak everything they got (be it evidence of contact with him pre-election, embarrassing video if it exists, etc.) to hasten his ejection? They still get to "destabilize" our gov't as a result, so everybody wins I guess.
02-26-2017 , 09:24 PM
Supposedly Trump's budget is coming out tomorrow with a 33% increase to the defense budget and "catastrophic" cuts to the EPA, OSHA, etc..
02-26-2017 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Supposedly Trump's budget is coming out tomorrow with a 33% increase to the defense budget and "catastrophic" cuts to the EPA, OSHA, etc..
And the latter group in total will probably be a tenth of the defense budget increase, but he'll play it up as only increasing one department/program while cutting 12 others or whatever (which I'll then see 87 people sharing/crowing about on FB). What an asshat.
02-26-2017 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMan42
And the latter group in total will probably be a tenth of the defense budget increase, but he'll play it up as only increasing one department/program while cutting 12 others or whatever (which I'll then see 87 people sharing/crowing about on FB). What an asshat.
EPA and OSHA budget together are only about one twentieth of 33% of the defense budget.
02-26-2017 , 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMan42
If that's the case, though, wouldn't it make sense for them to quietly leak everything they got (be it evidence of contact with him pre-election, embarrassing video if it exists, etc.) to hasten his ejection? They still get to "destabilize" our gov't as a result, so everybody wins I guess.
I suspect that will happen eventually.
02-26-2017 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMan42
If that's the case, though, wouldn't it make sense for them to quietly leak everything they got (be it evidence of contact with him pre-election, embarrassing video if it exists, etc.) to hasten his ejection? They still get to "destabilize" our gov't as a result, so everybody wins I guess.
Yes, putin is going to pull his trump supporting trolls the minute he stops being useful.
02-26-2017 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkubus
Why would the waiter remain anonymous? Is our presumption supposed to be that Trump is so senile he wouldn't even remember this meal?
The waiter could get harassed by pro-Trumpers or anti-Trumpers depending on how the story was perceived by the readers.
02-26-2017 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sylar
Why on earth would you eat steak with catsup?
You gotta dump something on a well done steak to make it edible. Might as well be ketchup.
02-26-2017 , 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12




Bilden withdrew his name

Spicer is just a complete clown
I laughed wayyy too hard at this. Such gold. What a sham.
02-26-2017 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
In the immediate aftermath of the Trump interview, Russian politicians allied with President Vladimir Putin reacted to the US President's comments with alarm, according to Reuters.
Many Russians had been hoping that Trump's praise of Moscow would mean friendlier relations between the two countries. Reuters quoted the chairman of the international affairs committee in the upper house of the Russian parliament saying that if Trump's campaign slogan, "Make America great again," means nuclear supremacy, it "will return the world to the worst times of the arms race in the '50s and '60s."
ok I'm super naive here and I'm really very curious about something. I read itt that we agreed with Russia (or some other country or countries) to dismantle our nuclear arsenal down to 1,500+ nukes. Why do we or any other country with the same pile need more? Compensation for small hands? Seriously though, isn't there already enough to destroy civilization on earth multiple times?

Last edited by .isolated; 02-26-2017 at 10:37 PM. Reason: go easy on me
02-26-2017 , 10:39 PM
There's literally no good reason.
02-26-2017 , 10:40 PM
its a symbolic thing for insecure republicans with tiny hands to feel strong
02-26-2017 , 10:42 PM
And a direct financial interest in defense contractors
02-26-2017 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
ok I'm super naive here and I'm really very curious about something. I read itt that we agreed with Russia (or some other country or countries) to dismantle our nuclear arsenal down to 1,500+ nukes. Why do we or any other country with the same pile need more? Compensation for small hands? Seriously though, isn't there already enough to destroy civilization on earth multiple times?
Enough to destroy civilization? Yes definitely. Enough to exterminate the human race? Maybe not.
02-26-2017 , 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Enough to destroy civilization? Yes definitely. Enough to exterminate the human race? Maybe not.
I'll bite. It's because of those Y2K bunker purchases. Correct?
02-26-2017 , 10:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
ok I'm super naive here and I'm really very curious about something. I read itt that we agreed with Russia (or some other country or countries) to dismantle our nuclear arsenal down to 1,500+ nukes. Why do we or any other country with the same pile need more? Compensation for small hands? Seriously though, isn't there already enough to destroy civilization on earth multiple times?

Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
There's literally no good reason.
There is no good reason. Some money would obviously be needed for keeping things in working condition or at least from deteriorating to the point there were more leaks, but any kind of significant expansion is just pork barrel.

https://www.thenation.com/article/me...clear-arsenal/

Quote:
In 2015, the defense industry mobilized a small army of at least 718 lobbyists and doled out more than $67 million dollars pressuring Congress for increased weapons spending generally. Among the largest contributors were corporations with significant nuclear weapons contracts, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and General Dynamics.
02-26-2017 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
I'll bite. It's because of those Y2K bunker purchases. Correct?
There have been a lot of conflicting studies over the years about what the effects of a full scale nuclear war between superpowers would look like. While civilization almost certainly collapses due to the huge die offs, inevitable starvation and outbreaks of just every disease imaginable, and breakdowns in every social structure we depend on for modern life, there is not a consensus on whether the earth becomes so irradiated that literally every human dies, life is pretty resilient. Most people likely don't die directly because of the nukes either, they die because of the secondary effects of the collapse of civilization.

Edit: Also we survived a devastating ice age 195,000 years ago, so if Nuclear Winter is a thing, we'd almost certainly survive that as well.

Last edited by fxwacgesvrhdtf; 02-26-2017 at 11:14 PM.
02-26-2017 , 11:08 PM
We had an agreement with Russia to mutually reduce our nuclear arsenals

Putin asks Trump on the phone about continuing that plan and Trump says Obama made a bad deal and wants to renegotiate

Now he comes out saying we need to be first in nukes even tho we already are

Cold War 2 incoming
02-26-2017 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Most people likely don't die directly because of the nukes either, they die because of the secondary effects of the collapse of civilization.
That's comforting

      
m