Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-25-2017 , 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
It seems like everyone working less is a better solution socially than fewer and fewer people doing all the work and everyone else on the dole. I don't know how to make that happen, but a longer period of publicly provided education and then retirement would do something along those lines. More broadly requiring overtime pay and paying after fewer hours might move things in that direction as well.
Reduce the mandatory work week is one way.
02-25-2017 , 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
C'mon now Max Theory, we both know it isn't physically possible for you to be a hobbyist to the level I was referring to in "a lot of fields". Just not enough hours man
Lol, of course not. Hobbyist is a really, really low bar to clear. I consider myself a hobbyist on the search for exoplanets for example. Its not hard or time consuming to read a handful of papers a year and go to a talk or two.
02-25-2017 , 03:50 PM
It's getting harder to avoid the "Trump as 3rd world dictator" trope when he's calling for pro government rallies.
02-25-2017 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Reduce the mandatory work week is one way.
For sure. Despite my arguments in favor of socialist/anarchist policies, I'm not really a socialist and definitely not a top down big state socialist. I'd prefer the gubmint dealt more subtly with some carrots and sticks rather than just mandating how many hours people can work.
02-25-2017 , 03:52 PM
Max,

I will stick with 'Extreme Hobbyist' in the future
02-25-2017 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
For sure. Despite my arguments in favor of socialist/anarchist policies, I'm not really a socialist and definitely not a top down big state socialist. I'd prefer the gubmint dealt more subtly with some carrots and sticks rather than just mandating how many hours people can work.
Except the government doesn't mandate someone's work week hours.
02-25-2017 , 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Except the government doesn't mandate someone's work week hours.
Did you read the post I was responding to? It was quoted.
02-25-2017 , 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Did you read the post I was responding to? It was quoted.
Yes, and that post was silly.
02-25-2017 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Except the government doesn't mandate someone's work week hours.
What's the ****ing point of that post anyway?

Can you explain how you interpreted my post as a claim that government does (as in currently) mandate someone's work week hours?
02-25-2017 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt217
So what do you guys think the chances are that we actually expand the welfare state to the point where it would provide a decent standard of living for all the people automated out of jobs? The way I see it going now, is that more and more people are put into situations like the current 50-65 year old, white, no college demographic that is killing themselves in record numbers through drugs and alcohol. Like, the increased drug/alcohol abuse was something that started and went on for years before anyone noticed, so I just don't see people ever feeling like there is an urgent need to expand the welfare state.

I don't necessarily think we'll need UBI, just an expansion in the size and scope of programs that already exist. Which would be easy to do and wouldn't necessarily cost all that much. Which makes all of this so maddening. We know that there's a problem coming, we know the solution, we know it will be extremely beneficial and not all that expensive, but there's like no real chance of it actually being implemented.
This subset of the American population has really taken a defeatist standpoint.

Unwillingness to learn, adapt, and move into different fields of work.

Now it's festered into the ultimate social blame game. I don't have this because of that minority over there. Or I don't have these benefits because of that religion there. It's a combination of poverty, racism, and xenophobia.

Mr. 55 year old man in rural America with no education or willingness to adapt: You are not predestined to be successful. And you sure aren't superior to those who do work hard to become successful. (Whites or non-white).

And some don't realize how much racism (myself included until recently) still remains in this country. Brown vs. the board of education was only 1954, and not until the mid 70s did the civil rights movement really show results.

I guess I was naive to think we were progressing as a nation, now it's clear we're going back a generation, possibly even two.
02-25-2017 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Yes, and that post was silly.
So then you were responding the Huehue, but quoting me?
02-25-2017 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfinillini
This subset of the American population has really taken a defeatist standpoint.

Unwillingness to learn, adapt, and move into different fields of work.

Now it's festered into the ultimate social blame game. I don't have this because of that minority over there. Or I don't have these benefits because of that religion there. It's a combination of poverty, racism, and xenophobia.

Mr. 55 year old man in rural America with no education or willingness to adapt: You are not predestined to be successful. And you sure aren't superior to those who do work hard to become successful. (Whites or non-white).

And some don't realize how much racism (myself included until recently) still remains in this country. Brown vs. the board of education was only 1954, and not until the mid 70s did the civil rights movement really show results.

I guess I was naive to think we were progressing as a nation, now it's clear we're going back a generation, possibly even two.
This is a sad post, microbet
02-25-2017 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
Max,

I will stick with 'Extreme Hobbyist' in the future
Or don't call out people in fields where its so easy to have better qualifications and know more than you do. Could be shortend to "don't call people out" in your case.
02-25-2017 , 04:05 PM
Anyone else worried about Skynet?
02-25-2017 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
This is a sad post, microbet
Why are you addressing me in particular about that?
02-25-2017 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecriture d'adulte
Or don't call out people in fields where its so easy to have better qualifications and know more than you do. Could be shortend to "don't call people out" in your case.
Don't be so bitter M dog. I know a good bit about the field. I communicate with people who most certainly know more about it than me, you and Sylar combined. I am confident in my posts on the topic that thinking it is going to take over 20 years to automate the shipping industry is absurd. Sorry buddy
02-25-2017 , 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
This is a sad post, microbet
Sad but accurate?
02-25-2017 , 04:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
So then you were responding the Huehue, but quoting me?
Responding to both. The govt. shouldn't have a role in determining work week hours other than what qualifies as overtime. Some people willingly work long hours.
02-25-2017 , 04:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Why are you addressing me in particular about that?
Bad joke, sorry

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfinillini
Sad but accurate?
Yes
02-25-2017 , 04:15 PM
Can you guys STFU now and get the F out of the thread? K tnx. One more derail post and you will get a time out.
02-25-2017 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Responding to both. The govt. shouldn't have a role in determining work week hours other than what qualifies as overtime. Some people willingly work long hours.
That's conforms exactly with what I said, but I could swear your first response* was disagreeable.

"Except the government doesn't mandate someone's work week hours."
02-25-2017 , 04:18 PM
It isn't a preference thing like you implied. It is actually what limited government is about.
02-25-2017 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Yes
I guess this is what happens when progressive thought is removed by an administration and all we have leftover is a small cabal of Christian Right white supremacists who value nationalism and economic sovereignty over globalism and enlightenment.
02-25-2017 , 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
Bad joke, sorry
No problem. I wish I got the joke. If you're joking that "Unwillingness to learn, adapt, and move into different fields of work" describes me, I'll get defensive.

I was in housing development during a housing boom in the early 90s, computer programming/web development during the dot com boom in the late 90s early 00s, poker player during the mid 00s, and solar right when it started taking off.

Damn, I should be rich.
02-25-2017 , 04:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
It isn't a preference thing like you implied. It is actually what limited government is about.
But Huehue seemed to me to be suggesting a government mandate on hours worked. Since I quoted him in my post you couldn't have missed it. So, I did not "imply it was a preference thing", I argued that I'd prefer not to adopt Huehue's prescription.

      
m