Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

12-29-2018 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
My two cents about the wall:

If President Kamala Harris or whoever gave 5 billion dollars for wall construction, I really wouldn't care. I would assume that they did their homework and found that a wall in spot X was the best way to control the flow of migration.

That said, I don't want Donald Trump to build a wall, even if it cost 0 dollars. There's no hypocrisy in this, because the entire world knows what the wall symbolizes for Donald Trump and his racist supporters and why they want it so bad. No one would shut down the government for a mere 5 billion dollars in border security. The symbolism of the wall is the real objective here, and that is what I don't want to see achieved.
If Harris hypothetically wanted a wall, I'd call her a nutter too. A wall is simply racism objectified and politicized and if the Dems bend one inch on the messaging, they are a bunch of spineless pussies. They should continue to make Trump own the shutdown. I feel for the workers affected, but the Dems only get more leverage in 5 days.
12-29-2018 , 01:22 PM
lol businessdude posts an article not backing up his claims and then reads to the end and sees half truth so he takes that to mean let’s divide $300 million in half, now the cost is $150 million, jfc you’re an idiot
12-29-2018 , 01:23 PM
I think allthecheese’s main point was the cost of the wall is irrelevant. The symbolism is what matters. It’s a good point that shouldn’t be forgotten when the gutless dems give trump $2.5B and pretend it’s a victory.
12-29-2018 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
The wall is actually a perfect way to do immigration. No more policies. Just build a 15-20 foot wall, get rid of Border Patrol, and if you can get over the wall you immediately become a citizen.
If we built a wall around each person's home it would totally solve crime too.
12-29-2018 , 01:32 PM
The FBI Lovers: Lisa Page and Peter... uhh, how do I spell sztrok? Let's just say Peter S because I don't have time to look it up and I REALLY need to get this information out on twitter right now
12-29-2018 , 01:34 PM
Peter stroked a page of Lisa & all the text disappeared..... ��
12-29-2018 , 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneEyedPoker
lol businessdude posts an article not backing up his claims and then reads to the end and sees half truth so he takes that to mean let’s divide $300 million in half, now the cost is $150 million, jfc you’re an idiot
I feel stupid this didn't occur to me. I read the article and there was something about ~$47M and I was wondering where he got the $150M.
12-29-2018 , 01:38 PM
House Democrats scooping up staff, lawyers to power Trump investigations

Quote:
While Democrats publicly talk up their interest in focusing on legislative priorities like health care and voting rights -- not to mention ending the ongoing partial government shutdown -- they are quietly preparing for what will likely be the largest congressional investigation of a sitting president in recent memory. Party leaders and committee chairs have spent months ironing out potential targets, from President Donald Trump's taxes and business dealings to the conduct of current and former Cabinet members.

To handle all this investigative work, House Democrats are expected to double the number of their staffers. Though they can't officially hire anyone until the new Congress is seated, plans are well underway, with House members saying that candidates -- especially those with specific investigative skills, from money laundering to contracting -- are coming from all directions.
Dems Quietly Staffing For Upcoming Investigations
12-29-2018 , 01:39 PM
Lol half true equals 300m divided by 2. Chessmate libcucks.
12-29-2018 , 01:45 PM
The endgame of this presidency, imo, is when Con Jr, Ivanka and Jared get indicted. I believe he works out the only deal he gets accomplished, immunity from prosecution of himself and his family in return for resignation.
12-29-2018 , 01:49 PM
Since the dead 8-year old boy has already vanished from the news, I thought I'd take a look back now that more of the story seems to have come out.

From what I can tell, he and his father were bounced around in the system for several days after being caught. By the time he was taken to the hospital after being identified as looking sick, he'd probably been having symptoms for a couple of days, although those symptoms could have been something as low grade as a sore throat and low grade fever.

It's hard for me to see how a flu test wasn't done of the first visit to the ED - in flu season, our pediatric area of our ED does a screen on pretty much every kid with fever/cough/sore throat - not because it's necessarily going to change what we do, but because we want to separate the flu positive goats from the sheep. Influenza is CRAZY contagious. But knowing that the kid had influenza could have prompted starting antivirals IF symptom onset was 48 hrs. or less from the time of the visit - after 48 hrs., the antivirals do nothing (and some studies suggest they may actually be harmful)

Additionally, knowing a patient has influenza should prompt a more careful evaluation for associated bacterial pneumonia, which is the most common catastrophic problem associated with influenza - it's not at all clear why a small subset of patients get this, but if they do (especially in kids/elderly/immunocompromised patients) things can go south VERY quickly.

Sadly, once the kid was discharged after the initial ER visit he was likely doomed - and may have been even had he been admitted. Last year, 185 pediatric patients in the US (at a minimum) died of influenza - about 80% of them hadn't been vaccinated, and it's a pretty good bet this boy hadn't been (i'm assuming that because they had likely been traveling for some time - most countries are better than the US about vaccinating kids for a lot of things, but I'd guess he got missed - and he could have been one of the unlucky 20%, anyway.

Despite being really common, influenza is still poorly understood in a lot of ways - and one of the biggest things we don't understand is why a very small subset of patients die suddenly and dramatically from it. I attended a conference a couple of years ago where a researcher argued that some people have an atypical response to the flu antigens which triggers a cytokine storm - basically, your immune system goes bat**** crazy and attacks your own self - which explained why the 1918 pandemic killed millions of young "healthy" people - in older people (like me) the immune system just couldn't amp up enough to be dangerous. But no one really knows.

Every year we have a couple of kids and a couple of young (18-30's) people die of influenza despite hyperaggresive treament. A few more stagger out of the ICU and go home after a couple of weeks in the hospital. This happens at EVERY hospital in the US.
Sadly, I'd guess this kid was one of those patients.

Get your flu shot.

MM MD
12-29-2018 , 01:52 PM
I missed the point where BD got talked talked down from billions to millions. Either that or factors of 1000 no big deal. Stars or dollars.
12-29-2018 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
I was once on the Metro reading the Bourne Supremacy, which is insanely horrible nonsense, and some pretentious wannabe sitting next to me rolled his eyes about how much worse the (really really good) movie (which actually shares no plot elements with the book) was.
Introducing shaky-cam fight choreography forever makes it in the bad movie category and puts your opinion on movies on, um, shaky ground.

Last edited by kerowo; 12-29-2018 at 02:00 PM.
12-29-2018 , 01:55 PM
Are we surprised that gaslighting Trumpers are dumb? We shouldn't be, because they all are.

Anecdotal story. Over Christmas had more than a few beers with my BIL who is a (by today's standards) moderate Republican. He starts into this both-sides bs about how the radicals on both sides are causing the issues. I point out that on one side the radicals are nazis and white supremecists and on the other side the "radicals" are people who think that abortion should be freely available, we shouldn't use fossil fuels, we shouldn't eat meat etc. and point out that there is no moral equivalence. He of course gets mad and so I ask him to name some examples of equivalence between the literal nazi's on the far right and their companions on the left. Here are his attempts:

1)The people who went after the cake shop who wouldn't bake cakes for gays
2)The people at Berkley who protested Milo. He said many were bussed in by Soros
3)The people who went after POOR BABY KAV
4)The people going after Christmas music like Baby It's Cold Outside

Yes in his mind those people are just as bad as nazis and KKK. My wife and I literally laughed in his face.

I mean jesus ****ing christ. I asked him how many of these wonderful ideas he got from Fox News and AM radio and according to him none but I'm guessing 100%. I realize this isn't news to any of us but when this is your "reasonable" republican we are beyond ****ed.
12-29-2018 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Immigration is not a problem. It rises and falls based on our economy's need for labor. That's all good. Just like with the drug war, making it illegal causes problems. It creates criminals, and generates money for organized crime.
A wall is not inherently anti immigration. On the Weeds podcast, they talk about the "big beautiful wall" in San Diego, which has a big beautiful door through which lots of people and goods flow. People seem okay with it or that's the impression that they give.

Last edited by AllTheCheese; 12-29-2018 at 01:59 PM. Reason: ETA: To be clear, Donald Trump's wall IS anti-immigrant.
12-29-2018 , 02:01 PM
Russian Ex-Spy Pressured Manafort Over Debts to an Oligarch

Quote:
When the U.S. government put out its latest sanctions list on Dec. 19, the man named at the top did not seem especially important. Described in the document as a former Russian intelligence officer, he was accused of handling money and negotiations on behalf of a powerful Russian oligarch. The document did not mention that the man, Victor Boyarkin, had links to the 2016 campaign of President Donald Trump.

A months-long investigation by TIME, however, found that Boyarkin, a former arms dealer with a high forehead and a very low profile, was a key link between a senior member of the Trump campaign and a powerful ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. “He owed us a lot of money,” Boyarkin says, (speaking of Manafort). “And he was offering ways to pay it back.”

When he joined the campaign in the spring of 2016, Manafort was nearly broke. The veteran political consultant had racked up bills worth millions of dollars in luxury real estate, clothing, cars and antiques. According to allegations contained in court records filed in the U.S. and the Cayman Islands, he was also deeply in debt to Boyarkin’s boss, the Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, who was demanding money from Manafort over a failed business deal in Ukraine and other ventures.

Boyarkin says it fell to him to collect the debt from Manafort. “I came down on him hard,” he says. But the American proved elusive. In a petition filed in the Cayman Islands in 2014, lawyers for Deripaska, a metals tycoon with close ties to the Kremlin, complain that Manafort and his then-partner had “simply disappeared” with around $19 million of the Russian’s money.
Manafort ties to Russian Intellegence Start To Become Clearer
12-29-2018 , 02:13 PM
There are no reasonable Republicans. Zero.
12-29-2018 , 02:14 PM
The wall is stupid and the discussion around it is stupid as well. There have been several studies and even a documentary film about fencing the border, it's all been shown to be a colossal waste of money, and that's been known for decades. The problem is that rubes still think it's a good idea and so R's have been holding sensible immigration policy hostage to 'border security' since forever, claiming nonsense like that they'll be happy to tackle immigration reform, but only 'after the southern border is secure'. Which of course is nonsense because as long as even one illegal crossing happens or one gram of drugs gets through they'll always be able to claim that it's not secure 'enough' and demand more.

So then you have Trump come along and enter the primary, and if we remember back to that happy time we also remember that his campaign was basically a joke at first -- right up until he started on about the wall. Which is fine of course if you want to appeal to idiots, but remember it's not like Trump and his campaign team did a bunch of research and studying and came up with a solution to a decades long problem. No, he basically just pulled the whole thing out of his butt and now that's the hill he's willing to die on. So fine, let him. But please stop with pretending like it's a notion that makes even an iota of sense, because it just doesn't.
12-29-2018 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
A wall is not inherently anti immigration. On the Weeds podcast, they talk about the "big beautiful wall" in San Diego, which has a big beautiful door through which lots of people and goods flow. People seem okay with it or that's the impression that they give.
I don't think there should be a border at all, but hey I love freedom/am an extremist. But, the way regulations work is that to a certain point they can be effective. People will get around them sometimes if it's easy. They'll comply if it's not too hard. At a certain point if there's enough demand not met and it's hard enough to get around restrictions there will be a black market which will cause new problems. So, while I'm against the big beautiful wall with a big beautiful door, it can have some effect - and actually I'm fine with inspections of fruit and stuff like that to limit the spread of pests which is somewhat effective and does require some border control, but in CA we do that for people coming from other states as well (or at least we used to - I haven't noticed that for a while). And also so...if legal immigration is easy enough there wouldn't be enough demand for illegal immigration for a black market to be worth it.
12-29-2018 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by businessdude
well, you'd be wrong of course - it's a top hit if you use google
I'm not claiming that the article is hard to find. I'm claiming that you most definitely did not read it before you started throwing that 300 billion number around. At best, you found it and read it after people started criticizing you but before I posted the article.

At this point, the smart money is on you still not having read the article if you honestly believe that it supports a number of 150 billion.
12-29-2018 , 02:23 PM
https://apple.news/AhL_HxFvgQt66VqVrVy64Ew

Grunch posting but looking like all federal workers will soon be Democrats...
12-29-2018 , 02:31 PM

( twitter | raw text )
12-29-2018 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I'm not claiming that the article is hard to find. I'm claiming that you most definitely did not read it before you started throwing that 300 billion number around. At best, you found it and read it after people started criticizing you but before I posted the article.

At this point, the smart money is on you still not having read the article if you honestly believe that it supports a number of 150 billion.
No no, it's been proven "half-wrong", so you just take that number he pulled out of his ass before and chop it in half. It's simple math bro.
12-29-2018 , 02:33 PM
Come on baaaaby, you know I don't want to kill children you just don't give me any other choice when you act out like you do.
12-29-2018 , 02:34 PM
We used to worry about politicians being beholden to donors and corporate interests, but we have somehow ended up with our chief executive beholden to foreign powers. This ****er cares naught for the common man he supposedly espouses but only about his own financial interests.

      
m