Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
My contention is that when people see you guys talking about secret hand signals from the white house as a guy adjusts his tie, you lose credibility. Everything you say is then judged through the lens of "yeah, but, they also think there is a secret conspiracy to conduct white supremacy from the White House using smoke signals and Morse code."
A few people on here called Rand Paul a white nationalist. So when I see that, and I see the same crew examining hand positions, I can't help but wonder what other claims of racism are complete nonsense as well.
Good luck finding any group that has any credibility, then.
Again, though, it's not clear at all who you think makes up this group, who this group represents, why the few people discussing hand signals represents whatever group you're talking about...
And it's not clear why this makes you... less skeptical of Trump? I don't know that you're saying it does, but that's one guess of what you mean when you talk about winning you over. I don't know what winning you over means. Does it mean convincing you to vote Democrat? Do you think this thread is representative of Democratic Party voters and/or candidates? Do you think you apply the same criteria to the extrapolation of the hand signal discussion that you apply to other groups regarding degradation of their credibility?
Why do you feel the need to rely on the credibility of these Internet posters to "win you over" or otherwise inform your vote/position/research?