Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
that is really scary rhetoric. its very similar to the anti-semitic scapegoating in europe years ago.
and wtf are these safe zones? as far as I understand, the govt of asad wants to kill ppl, and isis wants to kill ppl. so we are gonna build a safe zone from those 2 groups? doesnt really seem feasible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron81
My understanding is they are supposed to be refugee camps near the Turkish border.
Assad and ISIS aren't the only players. I've just been getting interested in Rojava and the Democratic Confederation of Northern Syria lately. It's a federation of three cantons based on the ideology of a libertarian socialist and pioneer of the ecology movement and anarcho-feminism. The majority of the people in the group are Kurdish, but it's not based on ethnicity or religion. There's also a Kurdish Nationalist Group which is or is tied to the Kurdish autonomous region in Iraq and I think there's the Free Syrian Army or something and the US has not only been providing arms to these groups, but has already been giving supportive air strikes and training. This is all happening along the Turkish border and is quite complicated by the Turkish invasion of Northern Syria and the adversarial relationship of Turkey with the Kurds in Turkey. The Kurdish Nationalists are pretty right-wing and authoritarian, which means business friendly, certainly compared to the Anarcho-Socialist-Feminist-Ecological-Democratic Kurdish group, so my money would be on them receiving the bulk of the US support.
A no-fly zone in the area would be to protect one or more of the Kurdish groups I think. Russia also seems to want to protect some of the Kurdish groups as well I think. Assad, a member of a religious minority himself in Syria, has not been universally hated by groups like the Kurds and Yazidis (who were rescued by the Feminist Democratic Confederalist Kurds when they were up on that mountain).
Anyway, that's my understanding at this point, but I'm just getting into recently.