Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
If you want to make the claim, 'Islam is in bad shape, they've let the lunatics take over the asylum,' then fine, you'd have some fertile ground, but it seems easier for them to just say Islam is all lunatics from the 1st day.
I don't think the bolded is what Harris is saying. My interpretation is that he's simply pointing out that MANY religions have some pretty bad ideas and when taken literally can lead to harmful effects. Islam just happens to be at the forefront now because a very small percentage are using fundamentalism to kill people in any way possible. I'm sure Harris would concede that Islam has nothing on Christianity when it comes to violent and bat**** crazy ideas. But the fact is, there aren't currently groups of Christians (that I know of) who are trying to take over the world through unspeakable violence. You'd have to go back a few hundred years for that.
I take him to mean that even though the overwhelming majority of Muslims are decent peaceful people no different than anyone of any other religion, even a very small minority can be scary considering Muslims make up 1.6 BILLION people. He also cites polls which, if accurate are unsettling. Questions like: "Should the penalty for apostasy be death?" have more people answering yes than the rest of us should be comfortable with.
Quote:
Geopolitics is hard, broadbrushing an entire major religion is easy.
This is very true and it's important not to confuse religion with geopolitics or even geographic regions. There's a reason why some Muslim countries have had woman leaders while others, won't even let women drive a car. Is that religious law? Or the laws of a particular country? I tend to think it has more to do with the country and geographical location than religion.
Quote:
I'm a 'hardcore' atheist myself and I believe that gives me the freedom to explore religions with a lack of bias, so it's especially disappointing to see Harris et al get infected with various biases.
But as a (fellow) atheist, you must also see we should have the right to call out a set of beliefs and ideas we think are crazy, wrong, or harmful. If someone proposes their claim to me that some dude walked on water or survived his own death, I should be able to tell them I don't buy it and think it's a pretty silly belief to hold, just as I would if they told me they saw Yeti while hiking in the woods last night.
Quote:
I guess that's where I split from the so-called new atheists. They take the idea that not all religions are created equal but make the mistake that this somehow means they can clarify and quantify the differences.
Well, there ARE some differences. While you can justify violence under Christianity and Islam, you simply could not do so if you were a Jain. Ignoring this shows a cognitive dissonance that is nothing to be proud of.
Quote:
Some food for thought about making 'Islam is _____' statements:
I'm not sure what's in that blank. I'm not willing to make any blanket statement that Islam is ______'. But I AM willing to say that there are legitimate violent interpretations of Islam (just as with Christianity) and that a small minority have hijacked Islam to carry out these fundamental interpretations. Hence, I have no problem with the term "radical Islam". And I think Harris' only point is that radical Islam is currently a bigger problem than is radical Christianity, Judaism, etc., even if this was not always the case.