From The Star:
Quote:
Trump made the remarks in an Oval Office interview with Bloomberg. He deemed them off the record, and Bloomberg accepted his request not to reveal them.
So the way this is worded, it means (and the article later shows this a little more clearly) that he said "Off the record," and then spoke without getting it confirmed, or he said something, then said, "That's off the record."
Bloomberg granted his request, so basically they said "Yeah, ethically that's not off the record, but we'll make it off the record."
My guess is that there was a split between their reporters... some would undoubtedly feel like they were just given very newsworthy information on the record and had a responsibility to report it. Others, apparently the editor, didn't want to report it... They basically wanted to Haberman it - get in good with him so he keeps giving them interviews.
It's not uncommon in journalism to have some of those types of relationships where there's an understanding that the interviewee can hop on and off the record at will, and it will be honored... but that's certainly not the default.
So, I assume one of those journalists felt that their responsibility as a journalist was to make sure the newsworthy info got out... So they called up Daniel Dale and gave him the story.