Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
This just isn't true. Debate and speeches were a huge part of every victory you cite. Not the only part, but a big part.
What part did debates, in the public-space sense we're discussing here, play in the Civil War? Honest question.
In-person discussion and airing of views - some of which might be called 'debate', though most of it not - can be effective. Harvey Milk's observations on straight voting patterns when the voter knows they know a gay person comes to mind. Social issues, so far as I'm aware, have rarely, if ever, been influenced to any great extent by public debates. I'll want some concrete examples if you're going to keep leaning on this.
Quote:
You should care. We need to win minds to win in the long run.
We need to win them over into showing up. In 2016 we tried Principled Debate. Worked like a charm, because this is the real world and charms don't ****ing work.
And what I mean is that we could, conceivably, with a lot of effort, studiously avoid ever reinforcing Trump supporters' narratives. Will they care? No, ldo they'll circulate fake news claiming we're reinforcing them anyway - y'know,
like they already do. They didn't get where they are now because someone reasoned them into that position. They're not going to be reasoned out of it. We only play into their hands by allowing their purported concerns to define the terms on which we engage them.