Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
History just does not support your claim. I can't think of an example where censorship resulted in social progress. Every social debate has been won when the wrong side got to express thier wrong opinions. Of course we will lose some battles (like this election) but the arc of history is clearly towards greater social progress.
Nobody's talking about censorship. You seem to believe you are, but you're not. The bolded is some oddball mix of meaningless and false. LDO 'debates' are won when two sides debate. The Civil Rights movement was not 'a debate' and it wasn't 'won' when MLK gave a speech. Slavery wasn't ended when Lincoln and Davis had a debate. Change comes when it's demanded with enough force to make it happen. Not when people ask for it eloquently enough.
Quote:
Nobody should be forced to book idiots like Milo, nor should anyone be forced to watch if he is booked. I just think we lose the moral high ground and feed right into the trumpkin narrative if we spend all our time trying to play wack-a-mole with people like Milo. Let's say we succeed in preventing him from ever speaking publicly. There will be another Milo right behind him.
OMG nobody's talking about any of these things. I don't care if we feed in to the Trumpkin narrative; they certainly don't care when we don't.
Quote:
We win by having better ideas and showing they work better in the real world.
We don't win by preventing the other side from speaking.
Last time I'm going to say it:
nobody is preventing anyone from speaking.