I dont know anyone on fox but this shep smith has a spine or something

https://twitter.com/SteveKopack/stat...37307466334211

this just in?

is financial times a good source?

Why do you think he lied to the FBI (a felony) and to the Vice President about innocent conversations? I mean, I'm sure there's a reason, just curious about what you think the most likely one is.

so you are trying to spin this as the bowling green massacre was a thing and not completely fabricated by KAC?

you are dumb sir

Holy ****. I didn't see transcript of the end. I thought the "you're black so you must know the CBC" line in here was parody.

But no, he pretty much said exactly that.

Trump talks like autocomplete.

"I took her out furniture... I moved on her like a b****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married."

Shep is the only decent thing on Fox. He sometimes bows down to those who overpower him with bull**** in his 1 on 1 interviews, but his behind the desk person to camera segments are almost always pretty fair.

The only options here are:

A - Flynn discussed sanctions, Pence knew all about it but is claiming that Flynn did this without authorisation then denied it and therefore lied.
B - Flynn discussed sanctions, lied to Pence and said he didn't.
C - Flynn never discussed sanctions, told Pence the truth.
D - Flynn never discussed sanctions, lied to Pence and falsely claimed he did discuss sanctions because reasons.

You're saying it's C or D. If it's C, he has no reason to either resign or be sacked. If it's D, this is a weird reality.

Everyone else is saying it's either A or B. I would personally bet good money on A.

Here is the thing, treason is essentially a crime determined by the public. There is little precedent for it because most administrations don't even come ****ing close to the line. Trump today admitted that Flynn discussed sanctions with Russia. He also didn't deny that his team was in constant contact with Russia throughout the campaign, pretty much an admission from a guy who lies about everything. We also know that Russia illegally hacked Democrats and leaked it in a way to benefit Trump, with Trump's explicit public endorsement.

All the dots are there for treason, its just that prosecuting treason is a political process. Its almost so by definition, after all who is going to determine who are our "enemies"? The IC community is giving us, the public, the information to decide whether we will prosecute this case of treason. Trump is banking on his intuition, which is almost certainly correct, that vast majority of Rs are fine with him doing whatever it took to win and will excuse anything short documented suitcases of cash exchanging hands.

Note that Russia made considerable expenditures supporting his campaign and that Trump is taking the opportunity of Presidency to enrich himself in plain sight. That is all okay though. Again, it will take suitcases of cash for Rs to bedgrudingly say "you got us this time." Anything short of that is "don't hate the playa, hate the game."

https://action.trump2016.com/trump-mms-survey/

Trump sent this survey to his supporters today. About a quarter of the Q's are essentially "did the media report not enough of how great I am?"

The following say hi:

Death panels
Gun confiscation
Obama's birth certificate
FEMA camps
Welfare queens
Emails
Spirit cooking

and that's just to name a few.

Lol @u

The biggest problem with the hysteria now--on the chance that the russia connections aren't as deep as many think or nothing else can be proven from here--it's gonna be very difficult to unseat trump. Everything will change. He'd love nothing more than to use that to crush say CNN/MSNBC from existence.

I wouldn't go that far. I mean, there is no need to put words in his mouth when he says so much verbatim that hurt him on his own. I don't see it being helpful to infer racism on things like the above.

I go through this denial phase almost every day.

Jfc.

The actual probabilities don't matter as much as where the money is being bet. A sports book wants the odds to be such that an equal amount of people are betting on both sides (adjusting for the payout) so that no matter which side wins, the house makes money because of the vig. Right now too many people are betting on one side at the odds they currently have posted and they can't keep up with it fast enough to get action on the other side. Anyone want to bed which side is getting too much action?

You missed your talking points today. New line is Flynn talked about sanctions but that was perfectly fine, it was his job actually. The problem is that Flynn lied to his own VP about talking about the sanctions with Russia, which again was a good thing.

In summary, we should be thanking Flynn for doing such a brilliant job in dealing with Russia, the issue is that he was so humble that he lied about doing such a great job. And that is totally unacceptable, so he had to go.

Yes, we are this far down the rabbit hole.

-pope endorsed trump
-hillary has alzheimers
-pizzagate
-wikileaks are huge real news every day and it isn't being reported bec of liberal media bias (this is the line they went to the media companies with, claiming to be actual viewers when in fact they cut the cord years ago and get most of their news from internet). squeaky wheel got the grease

Jesus people, look at his behavior. He is a pathological liar and even he won't issue a blanket denial. He is guilty as hell. Also, hes ****ing ******ed. Any kind of actual investigation will uncover his guilt.

Well, you manage to talk about issues and not link right wing hate sites. Weird how that seems to make a large difference.

the new line would be that the serial liar, guy who purposely makes his business deals as opaque as possible while writing off billion dollar personal income losses per fiscal year from his own taxes (which he claimed in the debate is proof that he's smart), told the truth about how he fired a loyal friend who is a good man, for lying about something that was totally legal.

and that multiple domestic and foreign intelligence agencies are all lying to the free press, globally, in order to make putin seem like a bad guy

I still don't believe it. I think if I watched it I would flip out.

Which online sources do you use? (Select as many that apply.)
Drudge Report
Breitbart
National Review
Weekly Standard
Free Beacon
Daily Caller
American Spectator
Red Alert Politics
Other

LOL?