Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
When's the last time anyone used the law that silenced warren?
The only reason not to use it is the likeliness they don't have hard proof.
To your first point: That's not equivalent so I won't respond to it.
To the second point: No, and the article was clear about that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoltinJake
Legal trouble aside, it's more evidence that Trump people are in cahoots with Russia. And it's yet another example of them lying about it.
Yes, I said something similar in my post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by th14
the Logan Act of 1799 has never been successfully prosecuted because it's rare for Americans to undermine USA foreign policy and difficult in the past to prove. It doesn't follow that recorded conversations of Michael Flynn contemporaneously violating the Logan Act should be ignored.
If I'm reading the article correctly, prosecution has never been attempted, it's not just that it's never been successful. Also you're missing another reason which the article mentioned: it's normal and proper for a transition team to be in contact with foreign officials, it would need to be a very specific discussion to become illegal, and if the discussion only hinted at lifting sanctions it would be in a gray area which could drive hundreds of officials in the future to be needlessly conservative and avoid engaging in conversations that would be legitimate and beneficial to the US.
Furthermore, if prosecution is unlikely to be successful, yes that is a good reason to leave it alone. This is not like Benghazi or emails, Republicans knew Clinton never did anything actually illegal, the best they could hope for was to inflict political damage. You don't want to push everything hard when there's a good chance of eventually uncovering legit treason. There's also no need to push hard when similar controversies are exposed on a daily basis. The correct play is to needle the administration about it to make them defensive then repeat for the next controversy. Fight harder over the things you can win, like the Muslim ban. Make the story about how Trump loses every major battle and also look at the number of minor battles that were never really pursued but definitely didn't look good. Trump's scam is getting people to believe he's a winner at everything. Showing him to be a loser would be particularly damaging to his support but you have to craft that story with some tact to make it effective.