Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-09-2017 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
See you in court? So what's Trump gonna do w/ the SCOTUS laughs at this and throws it out the window?
Well, then we get to find out if Trump will honor the court's decision, and then if the GOP Congress will take him to task if he does not, and then if we still have a republic if they do not.
02-09-2017 , 08:18 PM
Trump border 'wall' to cost $21.6 billion, take 3.5 years to build: internal report

Quote:
President Donald Trump’s “wall” along the U.S.-Mexico border would be a series of fences and walls that would cost as much as $21.6 billion, and take more than three years to construct, based on a U.S. Department of Homeland Security internal report seen by Reuters on Thursday.
"wall"
02-09-2017 , 08:20 PM
LOL BMOL.

How salty are those tears?

If the SCOTUS is going to vote in favor 7-2 or 8-1, why the need to wait til after Gorsuch is confirmed? His vote won't matter right?
02-09-2017 , 08:20 PM
"beautiful wall"
02-09-2017 , 08:20 PM
Does that include the "virtual wall" parts
02-09-2017 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
This country has turned entirely politically based on everything. These judges all violated the law and ruled based on things Guiliani or Trump said. I can't see any of the Conservative judges on the SC swinging on this at all.
I want to hear every single detail you can muster about this. Every single one.

I'm most interested - though I'm acutely interested in all of it - in hearing why enforcement of the Constitution to invalidate an illegal executive order is, itself, a violation of the law?

EDIT: Also very interested in whether you've read the opinion yet? It would appear not.

Last edited by CPHoya; 02-09-2017 at 08:27 PM.
02-09-2017 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
I've yet to hear one legal analyst on CNN Foxnews or any other news network say they don't expect the Supreme Court to overturn this
you aren't watching CNN, I can tell at least that much
02-09-2017 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Well, then we get to find out if Trump will honor the court's decision, and then if the GOP Congress will take him to task if he does not, and then if we still have a republic if they do not.
I don't see him doing something like that because he can easily be impeached at that point. Obviously he wouldn't because of the GOP majority House and Senate, but they'd the motions would start
02-09-2017 , 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
This is such a joke.
Cool, let's hear it.

Quote:
Ruling based not on the constitution but on politics. This country is so finished
LOL checks out, wp
02-09-2017 , 08:27 PM


i hope donald likes getting trolled
02-09-2017 , 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Is there some rule that all trumpkins itt must have less than 200 posts?
Well, they all keep getting banned.
02-09-2017 , 08:28 PM
the left wing judges made it 2-0, the right wing judge added 1 to make it 3-0. POLITICS
02-09-2017 , 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian


i hope donald likes getting trolled
Oh, that's going to leave a mark.
02-09-2017 , 08:28 PM
Quote:
It also does not account for major physical barriers, like mountains, in areas where it would not be feasible to build.
so 21 billions probly closer to 25?

we're getting far from your imaginary 12B DONNIE BOY
02-09-2017 , 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian


i hope donald likes getting trolled
2.9 would have been better
02-09-2017 , 08:34 PM
Trump the biggest loser is presidential history. I haven't been so happy about a court ruling since the gay rights ruling.

Glad to see at least one of the checks and balances have guts since the congress is filled to the top with spineless cowards.
02-09-2017 , 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by True North
Oh, that's going to leave a mark.
he should respond to her with

1-0
02-09-2017 , 08:35 PM


lol
02-09-2017 , 08:38 PM
Kellyanne Goebbels on fox saying when they get thier day in court to argue the merits they are confident they will win.

Sadly, Fox News fans will be too stupid to realize this ALREADY happpend.
02-09-2017 , 08:38 PM
so she was suspended for zero days for breaking the law when she blatantly promoted the trump family business on fox news during an interview about the white house
02-09-2017 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHip41
he should respond to her with

1-0
That would require the faintest semblance of a troll game, so that's out.
02-09-2017 , 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12


lol
sigh

his real tweets are bad enough no need for this stuff
02-09-2017 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12


lol
What in the actual ****.... jfc lolzzzz
02-09-2017 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
This is such a joke. Ruling based not on the constitution but on politics. This country is so finished
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOL33
don't use Roberts decision on Obamacare as a reference point. I fully believe he purposely ruled in favor of it standing because he felt it would lose Obama the election because it would remain a major talking point for the GOP. If it failed the issue would have gone away
lol.
02-09-2017 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Trump the biggest loser is presidential history. I haven't been so happy about a court ruling since the gay rights ruling.

Glad to see at least one of the checks and balances have guts since the congress is filled to the top with spineless cowards.
Nah, the cause for optimism here is that the court orders have thus far been respected, and that Trump is continuing to follow the process. This order was blatantly unconstitutional. But when it looked like the CBP folks at Dulles were just ignoring the initial injunction, it looked like we were facing an immediate collapse of checks and balances. There is still the threat of that, but at this point, the republic still stands.

      
m