Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshfan
I wish I shared this optimism.
Social media definitely makes it harder to shut people out. For all the **** the liberal base takes, they are engaged, connected, and well educated, and are on the lookout for voter suppression schemes etc. R states will jam some stuff through and yes, Jeff Sessions is now AG, but I think liberals can make enough of a fuss to avoid a lot of the worst timelines where huge swaths are outright prevented from voting.
We (this board, as well as society more broadly) often forget how much our politics is dictated by scared white old people, *because they vote.* Young people don't vote. Not because they are prevented from doing so, but because they are lazy. That laziness is in part bc of a belief that it doesn't matter anyways as all politicians are the same. What if that changes?
I think they (the base, and young people more broadly) will punch back hard. There is a sense of defeatism in liberal boomers/Gen Xs that were politically conscious through the Bush years that I dont see in Millenial and Snapchat progressives. Many of them have only known Obama and this is such an aggressive and transparent regression from that that they feel no choice to take to the streets. 45 is doing and proposing such nonsense; it shouldnt be surprising that a simultaneously well connected and well informed group is rising in unity to resist. You see it in the protests. Of course this is going to result in more turnout.
Also, the tea party did serious work with like 1/10th energy and numbers, to say nothing of tech savvy and raw intellect. Yes, it was coopted by smart, powerful people for their own ends, but I'd still take replacement level resister over replacement level tea partier in terms of potential to make something happen.
In sum - yeah it's bad and we are right to fear direct attacks on voting rights, but the optimist in me replies that the egregiousness of this takeover has awoken and mobilized the young in a way that could significantly change the map.