Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Meanwhile Barack Obama, who was in a position to do something that may have prevented all this happening, backed down when Assad ignored his ultimatum to not use chemical weapons on his own people.
But hell no, we can't criticize Obama for that capitulation. Let's have a dig at Trump instead.
Assad's chemical weapons destroyed without the need for invasion is a good thing.
1. Obama said the U.S. military would get involved if Syria used chemical weapons
2. Syria used chemical weapons domestically
3. John Kerry is asked by a reporter, is there anything Syria could do to avoid American military intervention, he said, yeah they could give up all their chemical weapons
4. Syria via Russia offers to give up all chemical weapons to avoid being attacked
5.
Quote:
By October 2013, without a bomb being dropped, the Bashar Assad regime had admitted having a massive chemical weapons program it had never before acknowledged, agreed to give it up and submitted to a multinational coalition that removed and destroyed the deadly trove....
According to U.S. estimates, at more than 1,300 metric tons spread out over as many as 45 sites in a country about twice the size of Virginia, Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons in 2013 was the world’s third-largest. It was 10 times greater than the CIA’s (erroneous) 2002 estimate of Iraq’s chemical weapons stash, and 50 times larger than the arsenal Libya declared it had in late 2011.