Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

11-16-2017 , 02:34 PM
i live in oklahoma. i think thats enough said about people in my sphere that are Trumpy.

eta- i got pushed out of my last gig for not putting enough people in prison.
11-16-2017 , 02:51 PM
I live in Trumpland, but my new neighbor has actually met him. It was during the campaign last year. He got a few minutes with him and is still proud that Trump spent the time basically talking about how hot his wife is. He's a lawyer for Persecution Foundation ???? probably a scam of some sort. I could post a good picture but not sure of forum rules for posting off of randoms Facebook.
11-16-2017 , 03:14 PM
The obvious divide in deplorables/non-deplorables in my family is age. Basically everybody in my family as old or younger than me is anti-Trump while everybody older is pro-Trump.

So we're a minority in the family, but over time we'll become the majority...I hope.
11-16-2017 , 05:44 PM
fox news facebook has 10+ posts/stories on Franken. I think they had 1 on Moore and skipped that last election cycle entirely.
11-16-2017 , 05:47 PM
There's a Trump documentary on tv in the U.K. right now. Apparently he borrowed $675 mill to build the Taj at 14% APR, 14!!!! In the 80's!
11-16-2017 , 05:53 PM
Interest rates don't matter when you know you're not gonna pay.
11-16-2017 , 05:55 PM
Could Don Jr. pass the mirror self-reflection test?
11-16-2017 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
Could Don Jr. pass the mirror self-reflection test?
If not I feel sorry for whoever has to oil up his hair.
11-16-2017 , 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley
There's a Trump documentary on tv in the U.K. right now. Apparently he borrowed $675 mill to build the Taj at 14% APR, 14!!!! In the 80's!
Interest rates were crazy in the 80s compared to now. That was slightly higher than I remember but I remember rates being at least 13%.
11-16-2017 , 06:56 PM
14% for a loan is lower than I remember.

You could get 5% on savings accounts, the good old days of rewarding savers instead of telling them to go **** off.
11-16-2017 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
November 9th:







Man, shows how I'm off my game. I knew the gaslighting / "no the REAL harassment predator is SOMEONE ELSE" was coming. Why did I think it was Jones?

The obvious REAL predators are the *reporters*:





sign our petition to sue these creeps if they have been harassing you. They keep calling and showing up and don't take no for an answer and ask us all these personal questions.
Lol, is this dumb**** talking about the fake Wapo robocalls that have been going out?

http://wkrg.com/2017/11/14/curious-r...tion-on-moore/

Wouldnt surprise me if these were Russia backed.
11-16-2017 , 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
14% for a loan is lower than I remember.
It wasn't a loan, it was junk bonds.
11-16-2017 , 07:36 PM
10 year treasury was yielding like 9% in 1988 when those junk bonds were issued, 14% sounds about right
11-16-2017 , 08:44 PM
11-16-2017 , 09:04 PM
What will be lost in all this partisanship of course is that Moore didn’t just sexually assault women but actively pursued 14 year olds when he was in his 30s. Dude is a straight up pedophile but yeah I guess maybe taking a stupid picture pretending to grab someone’s boobs is worse.
11-16-2017 , 09:15 PM
Kushner got emails about WikiLeaks, Russia in 2016, lawmakers say
In a section of the letter titled “Missing documents,” Grassley and Feinstein said Kushner had handed over some materials but omitted communications that mentioned some of the people connected to the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

“If, as you suggest, Mr. Kushner was unaware of, for example, any attempts at Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, then presumably there would be few communications concerning many of the persons identified,” the lawmakers wrote.

Grassley and Feinstein also alluded to documents they received from other witnesses on which Kushner was copied.

“Other parties have produced September 2016 email communications to Mr. Kushner concerning WikiLeaks, which Mr. Kushner then forwarded to another campaign official,” they wrote. “Such documents should have been produced...but were not.

“Likewise,” the letter continued, “other parties have produced documents concerning a ‘Russian backdoor overture and dinner invite’ which Mr. Kushner also forwarded. And still others have produced communications with Sergei Millian, copied to Mr. Kushner. Again, these do not appear in Mr. Kushner’s production despite being responsive to the second request. You also have not produced any phone records that we presume exist and would relate to Mr. Kushner’s communications regarding several requests.”

They asked Kushner to turn over all responsive documents by Nov. 27.

According to the lawmakers, Kushner’s attorney suggested providing some documents might “implicate the president’s Executive Privilege.”
11-16-2017 , 09:19 PM
Kushner still has security clearance obv. Oh so the cc’d Orange? Noice
11-16-2017 , 09:26 PM
Mueller Issued Subpoena To Trump Campaign For Russia Documents
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigators reportedly issued a subpoena to President Donald Trump’s campaign last month, requesting Russia-related documents from over a dozen top officials, reports the Wall Street Journal.

The subpoena, issued in mid-October, reportedly requested documents and emails with keywords related to Russia but didn’t compel any officials to testify before Mueller’s grand jury, an unnamed source told the Journal.

This is the first report of Mueller compelling the Trump campaign to hand over information.
11-16-2017 , 09:39 PM
Gotta be a decent chance Mueller is issuing subpoenas that cover documents he already has.
11-16-2017 , 09:43 PM
that's the game jared's playing lol
11-16-2017 , 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
Gotta be a decent chance Mueller is issuing subpoenas that cover documents he already has.
Why? Don't want to let them know how far into the investigation they are?
11-16-2017 , 11:13 PM
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...57870024687616

Last edited by uDevil; 11-16-2017 at 11:18 PM. Reason: Probably should go in the Franken thread. Oh well
11-16-2017 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Why? Don't want to let them know how far into the investigation they are?
Presumably they would be breaking the law if they didn't hand over stuff Mueller already knows they have?
11-16-2017 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Why? Don't want to let them know how far into the investigation they are?
Or to see how forthcoming they are.

      
m