The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. - Page 251 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

...

Page 251 of 5382

First

51 151 201 231 241 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 261 271 301 351 451 751 1251

Last

Page 251 of 5382

First

51 151 201 231 241 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 261 271 301 351 451 751 1251

Last

02-06-2017 , 02:30 PM

#6251

+rep_lol

banned

Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 14,900

i swear to god i want to shoot in the face every single person who types this "WAAF" ****

spamming defeatist memes is probably not the GTO play here guise

02-06-2017 , 02:31 PM

#6252

Paul D

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 14,689

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson

I think he's already smashed FoldN's record, but I wanna see if he can break 100 posts/day.

Bro. That's not what is impressive about FoldN. It was his 24hr+ posting bender in the Safe Space thread.

02-06-2017 , 02:33 PM

#6253

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,190

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul D

Look the anti-SJW guy needs a safe space from others using their "free speech". Milo would be proud of you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

These people are literally not worth my time.

You do not get "speak to Lord" privileges.

I require these things for people to talk to me.

Age: at least 24
Qualifications: At least BA level
Virginity: Must have lost it

Anyone not meeting these criteria will be summarily ignored by me from now on.

You really need to stop talking about safe spaces.

02-06-2017 , 02:33 PM

#6254

Trolly McTrollson

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 37,840

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul D

Bro. That's not what is impressive about FoldN. It was his 24hr+ posting bender in the Safe Space thread.

That was an amazing tour de force performance which will not be duplicated, but I really think cracking the century mark would be an impressive milestone for politics.

02-06-2017 , 02:39 PM

#6255

Hold'em 07

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 18,311

I see that lardjvk has infiltrated another subforum and his advanced aw tis moes is spreading.

This is his youtube channel for those of you that want to hate yourselves even more than you already do https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCya...QskDWcw/videos

02-06-2017 , 02:39 PM

#6256

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 19,544

Lord is the proud originator of this thread in the Probability forum. His logical reasoning is beyond contestation.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/25...29/?highlight=

02-06-2017 , 02:40 PM

#6257

iron81

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,730

My understanding is that what Lord is saying about Bannon paying for legitimate research that he feeds to MSM journos to print is basically accurate.

02-06-2017 , 02:43 PM

#6258

Autocratic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 11,276

Quote:

Originally Posted by iron81

My understanding is that what Lord is saying about Bannon paying for legitimate research that he feeds to MSM journos to print is basically accurate.

I don't get it, how is this interesting or news, let alone some sort of masterstroke? Obviously every big think tank is funding research and pushing it to the media.

02-06-2017 , 02:44 PM

#6259

MrWookie

Don't Call Me Meredith

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 94,159

Quote:

Originally Posted by iron81

My understanding is that what Lord is saying about Bannon paying for legitimate research that he feeds to MSM journos to print is basically accurate.

Yes, this much is inarguable and non-controversial. But Lord used dubious phrasing to imply that the "research" was "peer reviewed" rather than just being the churnings of a think tank, and that he was feeding academic publications, both journals and scholarly books, not just journalists in the MSM. And then the implication that this is noteworthy is pretty silly.

02-06-2017 , 02:45 PM

#6260

Clovis8

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 16,503

People really need to differentiate research journals from journalism. They are not related in any way.

02-06-2017 , 02:47 PM

#6261

campfirewest

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 10,179

Quote:

Originally Posted by +rep_lol

i swear to god i want to shoot in the face every single person who types this "WAAF" ****

spamming defeatist memes is probably not the GTO play here guise

That meme always makes me think of Bill Paxton in Aliens.

02-06-2017 , 02:53 PM

#6262

SuperUberBob

Not interesting enough

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 48,217

Lord's not fun anymore. Ban plz.

02-06-2017 , 02:59 PM

#6263

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperUberBob

Lord's not fun anymore. Ban plz.

It took less than 24 hours from when I added outtagetme to my ignore list and when he was banned. Maybe I'll do this thread a solid and do the same for lord, since none of you people seem able to control yourselves around blatant trolls.

02-06-2017 , 03:01 PM

#6264

SuperUberBob

Not interesting enough

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 48,217

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib

I can't be bothered with responding to trolls anymore. It's just not worth the effort.

02-06-2017 , 03:03 PM

#6265

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

Well I didn't mean you personally

02-06-2017 , 03:08 PM

#6266

ScreaminAsian

For President

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 33,333

trump to troops: "you love me"

02-06-2017 , 03:10 PM

#6267

57 On Red

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2014 Posts: 6,225

Quote:

Originally Posted by JacktheDumb

I did learn that the US legal system is called common law. Common law means that the law of the land is what courts rule. So this guy is a ****ing idiot.

Yes, this distinguishes the 'common law' countries (those which derive their laws from England's) from Continental code-based 'civil law' or 'Roman law' countries.

In common-law jurisdictions, such as, notably, the United States of America, the courts create law by case precedent: that is, how they interpret statute in actual usage. Only in civil-law jurisdictions is law determined by the fountainhead of the published code.

02-06-2017 , 03:10 PM

#6268

Clovis8

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 16,503

I do worry about being in a bubble sometimes so I actively try to find intelligent voices from the right, especially as I consider myself right on many financial issues.

The problem is I can't find them. Is there a William F. Buckley of today I am missing? Are there any intelligent voices supporting Trump?

There has to be some reasonable voices from the right. Can anyone help me find them?

02-06-2017 , 03:21 PM

#6269

heehaww

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 5,084

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clovis8

Is there a William F. Buckley of today I am missing? Are there any intelligent voices supporting Trump?

If William F. Buckley is the standard you're setting, then I'm sure there are "intelligent" Trumpsters all over the place.

"Mr. Chomsky, I obviously can't win this debate with words, so how about if I punch you in the face and proclaim QED?" Weren't there dozens/hundreds of people at the Trump rallies with that exact same debate strategy?

02-06-2017 , 03:30 PM

#6270

Clovis8

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 16,503

Quote:

Originally Posted by heehaww

Buckley was obviously intelligent and articulate whether you agreed with him or not.

02-06-2017 , 03:36 PM

#6271

DeroDeniro

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 1,273

The National Review sometimes has good articles in support of him. I was reading one the other day analyzing the Washington federal court decision against Trump. It was a pretty good analysis even though I disagreed with it. The writing there is like Pultizer prize stuff compared to Hannity/Blaze/Breitbart. Of course it was founded by Buckley so that's not surprising.

02-06-2017 , 03:40 PM

#6272

Parlay Slow

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 8,122

What does WAAF mean?

02-06-2017 , 03:40 PM

#6273

microbet

Solar Powered

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 57,095

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clovis8

Buckley was obviously intelligent and articulate whether you agreed with him or not.

He did literally threaten to, or at least contemplate, punching both Chomsky and Gore Vidal in the face whenever he couldn't keep up.

02-06-2017 , 03:40 PM

#6274

DeroDeniro

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 1,273

Where's my daily Spice? Did he off himself after the SNL skit?

02-06-2017 , 03:44 PM

#6275

heehaww

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 5,084

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clovis8

Buckley was obviously intelligent and articulate whether you agreed with him or not.

He's before my time, so maybe that's true. My only exposure to him was the interview/debate with Chomsky where he couldn't think of any counters to Chomsky's points except to threaten violence. To me that makes it highly unlikely that he was intelligent (regardless of his politics), but maybe I caught him on his dumbest day. (Edit: I didn't know he also did that with Gore Vidal, lol.)

To answer your question, this thread might help you -- http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/41...edia-1639698/?

Page 251 of 5382

First

51 151 201 231 241 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 261 271 301 351 451 751 1251

Last

...

Page 251 of 5382

First

51 151 201 231 241 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 261 271 301 351 451 751 1251

Last