The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. - Page 250 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

...

Page 250 of 5382

First

50 150 200 230 240 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 260 270 300 350 450 750 1250

Last

Page 250 of 5382

First

50 150 200 230 240 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 260 270 300 350 450 750 1250

Last

02-06-2017 , 02:02 PM

#6226

Autocratic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 11,276

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

What are the valid reasons for "shutting me down"?

You're a bad poster.

The most recent example, which you might remember, involved you claiming certain things about Steve Bannon. The request for a source resulted in lengthy back and forth where ultimately a source was pulled up and verified that you were incorrect.

02-06-2017 , 02:09 PM

#6227

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

Actually my source and claim was correct save for the detail on the journal, which we've established didn't really matter to the overall point anyway.

And judging from who I've seen posting with impunity here being a "bad poster" can't possibly be used as any sort of benchmark or there'd be a lot more banning.

I think it comes down to the fact people don't like someone being prepared to praise a man like Steve Bannon, they get angry and their impulse is to ban.

So ban away.

02-06-2017 , 02:09 PM

#6228

Trolly McTrollson

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 37,855

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

What are the valid reasons for "shutting me down"?

You're a POGger.

02-06-2017 , 02:12 PM

#6229

master3004

Revisionist Historian

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 56,466

Quote:

Actually my source and claim was correct save for the detail on the journal, which we've established didn't really matter to the overall point anyway. 
 
And judging from who I've seen posting with impunity here being a "bad poster" can't possibly be used as any sort of benchmark or there'd be a lot more banning. 
 
I think it comes down to the fact people don't like someone being prepared to praise a man like Steve Bannon, they get angry and their impulse is to ban. 
 
So ban away.

You're a hypocrite. You cried about your cousin who isn't going to be let into the states because of the travel ban and how it might affect his life, yet you openly praise the rasputin behind those very actions.

02-06-2017 , 02:12 PM

#6230

Max Cut

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Cut

You answer my questions first.

Asked three times...

*crickets*

02-06-2017 , 02:13 PM

#6231

aoFrantic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 25,218

Lord posted a YouTube the other day in chezland about the innocence of Daniel Hotzclaw. The cop who was found guilty of like 12+ rapes of black women. He's not worth the time, just a lying troll.

02-06-2017 , 02:14 PM

#6232

Autocratic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 11,276

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

Actually my source and claim was correct save for the detail on the journal, which we've established didn't really matter to the overall point anyway.

You were incorrect on the part everyone challenged you on. You were correct that Bannon funded opposition research. You were incorrect that such a move is brilliant.

02-06-2017 , 02:15 PM

#6233

weeeez

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 3,780

I dont get why lordjkv act so mysterious and holier than thou about his so called books and insights,but then Im not into wrestling.
Only thing Im sure about you is you crave attention.

what is your goal what are you trying to communicate?
Reading your post its absolutely unclear what you defend/advocate/your views.

you just spam general /obvious statements like politician use media to manipulate the mass.

Lets say we are all idiots here,try to be at our level and to use simple words with no riddles to communicate.

02-06-2017 , 02:15 PM

#6234

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

I'll ask for the third time, can you point to your five peer-reviewed books. If not, I believe that's actually grounds for a ban in this forum. You understand, we have to have rules.

02-06-2017 , 02:17 PM

#6235

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 19,564

I always knew that Huckabee would have been a terrible president. But it wasn't until five minutes ago that I realized he would have been just as bad as Trump.

That Fox News quote is out of this world.

02-06-2017 , 02:17 PM

#6236

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

Quote:

Originally Posted by aoFrantic

Lord posted a YouTube the other day in chezland about the innocence of Daniel Hotzclaw. The cop who was found guilty of like 12+ rapes of black women. He's not worth the time, just a lying troll.

Complete lie and derailment. I posted a number of female anti-SJW channels to prove that they were not all white men. The contents of those channels were irrelevant.

As is this sidebar. Completely not relevant. The amount of derailment allowed here is surprising considering how much talk of banning is going on.

How about engaging with the actual arguments at stake instead of this?

02-06-2017 , 02:18 PM

#6237

GTO2.0

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 3,981

Quote:

Originally Posted by JacktheDumb

On a side note. Three of the current supreme courts judges are over 80 years old. This seems odd, isnt there such a thing as retirement for judges in the USA?

Those guys were born BEFORE World War II and they are the ones shaping the law of the US.

I'm not certain but I think the majority over history have retired before dying. Certainly most lower court judges do, or take a much reduced senior status before then. O'Connor and Souther have retired within the past decade.

02-06-2017 , 02:18 PM

#6238

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

Quote:

Complete lie and derailment. I posted a number of female anti-SJW channels to prove that they were not all white men. The contents of those channels were irrelevant.

As is this sidebar. Completely not relevant. The amount of derailment allowed here is surprising considering how much talk of banning is going on.

How about engaging with the actual arguments at stake instead of this?

That's actually the reason you should be banned. It's impossible to engage with the actual arguments when you're injecting lies + nonsense into the conversation constantly and cluttering up the thread with our rebuttals.

02-06-2017 , 02:20 PM

#6239

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

Quote:

Originally Posted by einbert

I'll ask for the third time, can you point to your five peer-reviewed books. If not, I believe that's actually grounds for a ban in this forum. You understand, we have to have rules.

It's in the rules that I have to reveal my IRL identity? I won't comply with that sorry.

02-06-2017 , 02:20 PM

#6240

Max Cut

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

How about engaging with the actual arguments at stake instead of this?

Can't engage when you wont answer simple questions. Of course you can't answer because you were using a disingenuous argument that lead to a 50 post derail.

02-06-2017 , 02:21 PM

#6241

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

It's in the rules that I have to reveal my IRL identity? I won't comply with that sorry.

You can PM a mod but you have to back up your claims.

02-06-2017 , 02:21 PM

#6242

Max Cut

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

It's in the rules that I have to reveal my IRL identity? I won't comply with that sorry.

Then don't use things from your real life as support for your position.

02-06-2017 , 02:22 PM

#6243

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

Honestly don't see why you can't get the point re: Bannon. It's clear enough.

02-06-2017 , 02:23 PM

#6244

dereds

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 16,782

Quote:

Originally Posted by einbert

AIF's point I think is that if everyone just swerves posters of lies and nonsense banning them becomes moot.

02-06-2017 , 02:23 PM

#6245

well named

poorly undertitled

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 78,078

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson

You're a POGger.

harsh, but fair.

02-06-2017 , 02:24 PM

#6246

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

I just looked at the rules and this one has been broken countless times in this thread:

1. Attack the argument, not the arguer. This includes calling a user a troll.

Why is that allowed? It's been given a completely free pass.

02-06-2017 , 02:26 PM

#6247

aoFrantic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 25,218

Lord, the first thing my post does is show you lied about putting me on ignore yesterday. The second thing it shows is you routinely watch misogynistic, white supremacist youtubes in your free time.

People like max have asked you a handful of times for a response. This is not welcome here, the same bs routine about lying then not confronting your lies when asked for evidence is not welcome here.