Shouldn't the thread title be 50 stars?

Trump is announcing an EO on monday to combine the west coast into a single state and the North East into a single state. Star count is accurate.

Hell of a 10th post in 3.5 years.

Aa massacre actually did take place at the tip of Manhattan, though not by the nefarious “Muslim terrorists” whom Conway would have us fear. The real Bowling Green Massacre occurred in 1643 during what was known as Kieft’s War, and was perpetrated by white Christians. The Governor of New Netherlands Willem Kieft, sent European soldiers to move against two camps of refugee Natives, overriding the direction of his ruling council and the general sentiments of the colonists. The soldiers fell upon members of the Lenape Tribe with deeds that would long presage the notion of ISIS.

https://indiancountrymedianetwork.co...en-massacre-2/

i actually got my hopes up and thought there was a tiny chance he had gotten killed or something yesterday

because clinton foundation. you know, the charity that spends hundreds of millions of dollars trying to find and administer cures for disease and stuff like that.

what a ****ing moron

Not sure if I'm ponied here or what, but this was the original version of a statement posted on the White House website:



Name missing, and the "President of Australia" is not a thing that exists.

I mean, are these clowns ****ing kidding me? I'm not sure which is more likely, that they are too incompetent to look up the leader of Australia on Wikipedia, or that they are deliberately trolling Australia for displeasing the Fuhrer. I'm also not sure which is worse.

if by "fully support", you mean send them off to die so that defense contractors can profit, then yes, yes they do.

I've bookmarked this post since I expect to deploy it ~2 or 3 times per month for the next 1 to 8 years:

Obviously in this case the mistake, either intentional or not, is trivial in the grand scheme of Trump. But I think it's important critics stop asking themselves this specific question. With Trump, I'm convinced the line is intentionally blurry. He doesn't want your respect for his aptitude or competence like most people, so once he's dispensed of that, appearing stupid is an asset for grift and malfeasance.

Let the morning twitter rants begin...

looool this is almost as good an explanation as trump being assassinated

Just in case there was any doubt about the level of delusion we are dealing with here.

ONLY I TELL THE TRUTH

ONLY I CAN BE BELIEVED

waaf

Looks like the 538 gang is going to have to call an emergency podcast over Trump saying he accumulates his own data.

that isn't accurate, it's actively being fought in the court system and numerous judges have put stays on the order. we are winning that fight, and it's important that we look forward to the next one.

the bird for moderator!1!

and 90% of republicans approve of his actions in the first two weeks


can we never ever EVER pretend that any strategy other than "get out the democratic base to vote" is even a remotely viable plan. these people are ****ing insane. moderate republicans do not exist

Republican voters? Or Republican politicians?

Was there a poll released saying that?

I'm not denying that it's a possibility. But I really thought the approval would be lower.

this. obstruct everything, everywhere, communicate a clear message of why donald trump AND REPUBLICANS pose a threat to the very fabric of this nation, be extremely vocal/critical both in the media and in phone calls/letters/emails to state and local representatives, boycott companies who support their agenda, and focus on mobilizing turnout in midterms/local races. it's basically the only way to save this country.

I am not going to argue against your conclusion (I largely agree that the "resistance" should be turning out the base) but want to point out that a lot of these polls treat leaners and independents differently. The poll you are referencing might have defined "republican" as the most party faithful and represent a somewhat small part of the electorate.

Trump apparently not happy about talks of "President Bannon".

yea it's a remarkably simple and brilliant tactic to use against an unfettered narcissist. the best way to spur infighting is to publish reports/allegations of him not being in full control, make him seem weak/stupid/etc and leverage any disagreements/disputes amongst those in his inner circle

too funny cnn trying to pound some guy for not having apples to apples comparisons, this is the clinton news network wanting transparency (even though BERNIE got none)

that dude just told cnn not to make news out of 2 minutes soundbytes LOVE IT

REAL ? - They keep saying russia effeceted the outcome of the election, and Im wondering how. did they change actual votes after people casted them. Did they vote for people before those people could vote? Did they add extra votes from people that were dead or something? Did they change the number by hacking into servers after the votes were counted?

They could only change the outcome of the election if they changed added or deleted votes somehow. Is that what is being said if not how did they effect the actual outcome. And hacking into the DNC servers is not the answers cause as donna brazil would tell you, we dont know if those emails were tampered with (all the time CNN gave her too)

I had to read that tweet 5 times to understand his point. I think lil' Donnie is starting to lose it.

Congrats. You have proved you are not intelligent. Run along now. Back to /the Donald.