A growing number of feminists - you know, that group of women that gives their unconditional support to white men - make the argument that paternity rights in the US are unfair to men, especially when it comes to child support.

JFC

All things considered regarding the ban, Bannon, et al, what odds would you place on the possibility of a domestic false flag type of attack/incident within the next 6 months?

1 in 10

1 in 100

1 in 1000

1 in 10,000

Considering we're only a couple of weeks in, things are ramping up swiftly:
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/02/0...t-74-arrested/
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...n_muslims.html

They're mass overcharging protestors and Republican government officials are suggesting murdering political protestors in cold blood.

Are we talking about Trump's Supreme Court nominee? Please be sure to be intellectually consistent when the Greek Chorus is screaming for a filibuster to block a W appointee who passed the senate unanimously....

I concede, white men have it really bad in America. There is nothing tougher than being a white male today. You have won this debate. No need for you to make any further posts.

I could make a bloody fortune selling Prozac and Valium on this site....

What the hell is "Portage acacian"?

It means poor education, but using the words in normal conversation means the one using it has poor education by using obscure phrases no one knows about just to sound smart.

I don't want them to be quite at all.... just obey the laws and allow free speech.

In before Dan Adamini appointment.

Of the endless reservoir of Trump's human failings, the most dangerous and scary is his total lack of knowledge on virtually any topic. Without even a basic understanding of a given topic he can never be expected to make a good choice but rather is forced to simply agree with the last person he spoke to because by definition they will be far more prepared and knowledgable about this issue.

Can anyone imagine him ever saying anything like, "well actually I read recently that study X, intelligence briefing Y or expert Z has good evidence that A is true and therefore your position has some evidentiary issues and I am going to go a different way on this issue."

This is, "coincidentally", also what you wanted black people to do in the Civil Rights era.

Your mask is slipping, bro.

Exactly.

Spoiler alert, bros. Lord is over in Chezland raging against social justice warriors, making him a social injustice warrior. All of his posting here is completely insincere.

This is just nitting, but student populations are significantly more liberal at little schools like Lewis and Clark, Reed, Oberlin etc. imo. The riots in Berkeley are a product of it being a large liberal leaning school that can have big demonstrations in a very liberal city/area with a lot of non-student radicals and being a place where a lot of skateboarders and teenagers in gangs hang out.

UCLA, for example, is more different because Westwood is different. And UC Irvine? Forget about it. UC Irvine has plenty of radical students, but you know what it's like off campus.

Given that Putin could be available to help - I'd say it's pretty high. But they might wait until right before midterms.

Anyone who isn't concerned is either a) low-info or b) wants it all to burn down.

Georges Santayana says hello.... you realize the political rioting of 1968 lead to 24 out of the next 28 years of Republican rule. The American middle class is not a big fan of rioting and civil disorder.

You also realize Dr King won the moral argument without violence on his side.

What are you talking about? Politicians deliver on promises all the time. Like, Obama campaigned on healthcare, and he delivered a big healthcare bill. Bush promised tax cuts for the wealthy; delivered a big tax cut for the wealthy. The idea that Trump is some unique straight shooter is a Trumpist myth (and you seem kind of like a stealth-Trumpist concern troll). Trump just says horribly racist things that are outside of the mainstream but that are popular with a big minority of voters, which reads as difficult truth-telling to racists.

I know this is the wrong thing to be angry about right now, but there were four people who died in Kent State, you doughy illiterate pusbag. It's kinda easy to remember that because it's right there in the goddamn chorus --four dead in Ohio-- how is it you don't even know your own generation's pop cultural touchstones?

In the broken brains of the right protest equals violence.

Oh... please....

Right.... only you and the Greek Chorus "gets it".

I am going to buy a lot of stock in diaper companies Monday because if this board is any example, a lot of people are wetting themselves regularly.

Virtue signalling has always been a stupid term, because it doesn't really describe any signalling concept. The core concept of signalling is that it's a behavior that is costly to imitate if you don't have the characteristic that is being signalled (in this case, virtue). Cheap talk is the exact opposite of virtue signalling. The term you want is "sanctimonious bull****." More accurate, more descriptive, and less subject to the abusive ways people use "virtue signalling."

Combine that with Bannon being chief strategist. This is fine.

Reminiscent of William F. Buckley who often started a sentence with something like "potage acacian" and ended it with something like "I'd like to smash your god damned face in."