Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
So basically, argument ad populum.
Two things:
1. I acknowledge most people don't really care to take down the Jefferson Memorial, that wasn't my point and it wasn't your point. Before, you argued that monuments to Jefferson were justified because we celebrated the ideals he articulated but not the man. Now you're arguing they're justified because people don't object to them. You're just shifting the goalposts from your previous dumb argument to a better one, which whatever, kudos for arriving to something more coherent eventually.
No....its the same argument. People aren't offended by the Jefferson memorial because they don't associate the preservation of offensive ideas with the memorial and see it as a good faith effort to promote ideas we all value, regardless of Jefferson as a person. So don't remove. Thats the same argument i said in my first post that you poo pooed as being obvious, trivial and something you already understand, then have gone on to contradict over and over again.
Quote:
Frame it differently: do we agree the original erection of Jefferson Memorials and other Jefferson monuments were a historical mistake for right-thinking people, and that the only reason for keeping them is that most people are some mixture of confused, historically illiterate or amoral? Remember I concede the historical memory of Jefferson remains popular enough.
The problem is the "historical memory" of Jefferson is so strong that even the people that should be most offended by it (direct relatives of Sally Hemings, relatives of Monticello slaves, black people in general) don't really want the monument to come down. You want the monument to come down to teach them about how bad Jefferson was......i really don't care about whitesplaing that to them or the nation as a whole.
Quote:
2. The argument to remove JoePa's statue from PSU's campus was not that "many people are offended," it's that he covered up his employee's child raping. PSU leadership maybe caped to like some kind of national political pressure but they certainly acted courageously in the face of local popular opinion that deifies JoePa. At least if we define the courageous act only when considering what to do with the statue vis a vis the Penn St community, alums, donors, etc. (obviously I recognize the PSU admin was in fact complicit in covering up the crimes). JoePa remains a cult like figure on PSU's campus, that's why PSU slappies are still frothing about his statue.
Sigh.... this completely contradicts your reason for wanting to get rid of Jefferson statues. Penn State slappies are gonna venerate JoePa no matter what happens to the statue..... yeah they suck and ive given up on trying to make them suck less. We didn't teach them that he was horrible by removing his statue. We're glad it went down because we sympathize with Sandusky victims or Catholic church pedophilia victims or victims of sexual abuse in general who are offended by the statue.
You are not making the same argument for Jefferson.
Last edited by ecriture d'adulte; 08-18-2017 at 03:24 PM.