Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

08-10-2017 , 01:01 AM
Here is an article about Trump shooting at a gun range with some supporters during the campaign. Here and elsewhere the military academy Trump attended from age 13 to 18 is said to have taught rifling and mortars.

08-10-2017 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Does left up = remember and right up = lie? Also does this change for left/right-brained?
One is remembering the other is the creative part, which is the part you would activate to lie, so yes, even though i am not sure anymore which side was what. For Trump it might be special, i wouldnt be sure he even knows he is lying.
08-10-2017 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
Armed FBI agents breaking in and roaming around your house while you stand there in your jammies has got to make you question your choices. Or at least knock some of the smug off your corrupt face.
Considering some of the **** Manafort's allegedly gotten himself involved in it's probably a nice surprise they're not there to kill you.
08-10-2017 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Considering some of the **** Manafort's allegedly gotten himself involved in it's probably a nice surprise they're not there to kill you.
Yeah. Can imagine him yelling up to his wife after the door swings opens and the agents flood in, "Honey, you can come out. They're Americans."
08-10-2017 , 01:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by th14
Here is an article about Trump shooting at a gun range with some supporters during the campaign. Here and elsewhere the military academy Trump attended from age 13 to 18 is said to have taught rifling and mortars.



It looks like he's trying to do Charlton Heston.
08-10-2017 , 01:48 AM
Trump in 2012 told a reporter he owns a "H&K .45 and a .38 Smith & Wesson"

in other news Donald sold (April 2016) two ~$800k apartments for $350k/ea to Eric then seems to have claimed it was a fair market value deal, rather than a discounted gift to his son, in order to cheat on taxes:

This Trump real estate deal looks awfully like criminal tax fraud
Quote:
According to New York City property records, Trump paid $13,000 in state and local transfer taxes for these two sales. That is the correct amount for a sale between strangers. But if he paid state and local transfer taxes, that means he didn’t treat the transfers as gifts. And on the real estate forms filed in New York, Trump didn’t check any of the boxes indicating that these were sales between relatives or sales of less than the entire property. It would seem, then, that he treated the transactions as if they were sales for fair market value to a stranger.

Since Trump did not cast the transactions as gifts for state and local tax purposes, it is almost certain that he did not do so for federal gift tax purposes, either. In our combined 40 years of experience as tax lawyers, we are unaware of a situation in which a taxpayer would report a transaction as a fair market value between strangers on the state level (and thus incur real estate taxes) but treat it as a gift at the federal level (and thus incur an additional tax). It’s fair to infer that Trump didn’t follow the rules.

Willful failure to file a tax return, including a gift tax return, is a misdemeanor , punishable by a $25,000 fine, imprisonment of up to one year or both. Fraudulent failure to file — meaning an overt act of evasion — may elevate willful failure to a felony . That carries a fine of up to $100,000, imprisonment of up to five years or both, along with the costs of prosecution.
08-10-2017 , 02:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
ya there is exactly 0% chance jared turns on trump or that mueller tries to get jared to turn on trump
If Jared is anything like his old man I wouldn't be so sure. His dad did not hesitate using his own daughter as leverage.
08-10-2017 , 07:04 AM
Still annoyed at The Turtle this morning:



https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...99179522650112
08-10-2017 , 08:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Actually they're going to get overtime soon. I read somewhere that they were limited to 10-hour shifts now.

http://www.westernfarmpress.com/blog...w-overtime-law
I didn't know this. Good for California.
08-10-2017 , 08:06 AM
for once i agree with drumpf, mcconnell's spiel about things taking time here in DC is a bollocks excuse for massive failure
08-10-2017 , 08:09 AM
National Enquirer released a smear story on Manafort hours after it was reveled that his home was raided by fbi. Havent seen this before now, maybe its posted before. But lol


08-10-2017 , 08:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Actually they're going to get overtime soon. I read somewhere that they were limited to 10-hour shifts now.

http://www.westernfarmpress.com/blog...w-overtime-law
I was thinking more along the lines of traditional shifts meaning several per day. Unless they are harvesting at night now, you aren't going to be able to work in the fields much longer than 10 hours because there's not enough daylight.
08-10-2017 , 08:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Or I could erase a bunch of my memory and stick to what you know about Trump (and Russia) instead.

Glad to see the asterisks and exclamations made it into the thread so fast.
Lol at thinking Trump was carrying a gun

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
08-10-2017 , 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol


mcconnell is such a loser, getting appropriately dunked on by donald ****ing trump on twitter. rofl
Ha ha.

List of losers to get dunked on by Trump:

- Jeb
- Marco
- Cruz
- Fattie
- Turtle
08-10-2017 , 08:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
The North Korean Crisis is apt to end through bribery but of the secret variety. The money won't come from governments but rather from the super rich who want those tax cuts. To get that money Kim must not only stand down, but do it in a way where Trump gets the credit. There is even a small chance that the beginnings of the plan is already being implemented as of weeks ago.
Lol ok.
08-10-2017 , 08:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
I think the notice for Americans to get the hell out of North Korea about a week ago seems like it could be a pretty grim indicator that the Trump admin has been planning to go to war with NK. Maybe we're going to get to extend the 4th of July pretty soon and have some more bombs bursting in air and redneck cavemen beating their chests and drinking ****ty domestic beer and beating their wives, then grabbing them by the pussies of course.
I think Americans probably should've gotten the hell out of North Korea a while back.
08-10-2017 , 08:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
Are you saying NK currently possesses such technology? If not, it's all the more reason to stop them before they do, imo.

I also don't understand why it's not in the best interest of every other country on earth (including the other nuclear capable super powers) to stop NK. The world is dangerous enough as it is. Why would anyone want another nuclear capable country, which only increases the chances of nuclear holocaust?
It is in everyone's best interest to stop them. The problem is that the costs of stopping them militarily are potentially catastrophic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
http://fortune.com/2017/08/08/immigr...alflow_twitter



Hey Americans - good news, the jobs have returned! This is what you voted for. Now get out there and start filling those $12/hour, 10-hour shifts doing backbreaking work in 100°+ heat with no benefits!

http://abc30.com/politics/valley-far...-deal/1717165/



If you drove through the Central Valley last year - you'd know there were Trump signs EVERYWHERE. From my understanding they were mostly pissed about the damn gubmint telling them how to use their water in a historic drought. I guess they're learning they got sold a bill of goods faster than most. But hey lock her up though, and those liberal tears sure tasted good for a while.
Meh, maybe we can forgive them. They needed those tears for sustenance during the historic drought.
08-10-2017 , 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Ha ha.

List of losers to get dunked on by Trump:

- Jeb
- Marco
- Cruz
- Fattie
- Turtle
drumpf took mooch's business and marriage from him, he should be top of the list
08-10-2017 , 09:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
I was thinking more along the lines of traditional shifts meaning several per day. Unless they are harvesting at night now, you aren't going to be able to work in the fields much longer than 10 hours because there's not enough daylight.
are you kidding me? sunrise is before 7am and sunset isn't until about 8pm this time of year. math, how does it work
08-10-2017 , 09:21 AM
Quote:
Of course, our survey is only measuring reactions to a hypothetical situation. Were Trump to seriously propose postponing the election, there would be a torrent of opposition, which would most likely include prominent Republicans. Financial markets would presumably react negatively to the potential for political instability. And this is to say nothing of the various legal and constitutional complications that would immediately become clear. Citizens would almost certainly form their opinions amid such tumult, which does not at all resemble the context in which our survey was conducted.
Two things:

1. why even bother with the pretense of 'postponing' the election? Ask Trump voters: should we even bother with elections anymore? Would you be willing to accept any election where Trump was declared a loser? If so the context of postponing the election until 'voter fraud' is fixed is just taking the right-wing frame/excuses at face value
2. yet again another strange reassurance to readers that some vague norms, systemic factors, and rebellious Republicans would probably put a stop to it
08-10-2017 , 09:35 AM
They also have a favorable rating of a brutal dictator because he's Trump's buddy. This comes as no surprise.
08-10-2017 , 09:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
are you kidding me? sunrise is before 7am and sunset isn't until about 8pm this time of year. math, how does it work
That would be 13 hours not including a break for lunch, which isn't much longer than 10 hours at the longest period of daylight during the year and relative to shiftwork that covers a 24 hour day. I'm no Sklanski, but I think I can handle that math.
08-10-2017 , 10:02 AM
Is that any different than this poll?

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...term-for-obama

Last edited by raradevils; 08-10-2017 at 10:06 AM. Reason: oops i shouldn't show an opposition to the majority as it paints a picture that I supported the orange man.
08-10-2017 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
That would be 13 hours not including a break for lunch, which isn't much longer than 10 hours at the longest period of daylight during the year and relative to shiftwork that covers a 24 hour day. I'm no Sklanski, but I think I can handle that math.
you said there's not enough daylight now to be out in the fields harvesting longer than 10 hrs, which is incorrect. unless i'm missing something here?

      
m