It's not certain.

No, it can be an investigative tool to compel people to testify under oath.

No. Grand juries have an investigative function as well. You can compel people to testify in front of them under oath and can use them to issue a variety of subpoenas.


That said, as a former prosecutor, yeah he's probably seeking criminal charges in connection with he Russian probe.

The day after he appointed Greg Andre the foreign bribery expert.

Comrade your compirason is wrongstoika

Every single previous "this is it" has been yet another step on the road to the end for your president. FFS your guy is at 33 percent approval and is now taking flak from senators and governors in his own party who are openly rebelling against him. There are now multiple bills from members of his own party designed to stop him from firing the special counsel. You can keep deluding yourself that this ends well for your orange clown though. Good luck with that.

Europe and the US has nothing in common when it comes to immigration

i feel we're less than 3 months away from the grand unveiling of the drumpf: rut roh thread

Yeah immigrants allow America to remain great. Who they end up voting for is irrelevant.

even if that were true, it wont stop the investigation/grand jury proceedings

They say technically correct is the best kind of correct, but I don't buy it.

In that sense, then I suppose every day does indeed bring us closer to the end of the Trump era. Only 2726 days until Jan 19th, 2025.

A wild inso0 appears!

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...m_source=atltw

Meh, that's like saying that a GOP senate majority is goodbye Obamacare and look how that turned out. Gotta get them all to agree on something for that to be dangerous, and look at e.g. Brian Sandoval in Nevada or any number of Republican governors in New England who aren't going to roll over for whatever ways liberals think conservatives want to destroy the Constitution.

That's not to downplay the seriousness of Democrats' electoral failings in state houses around the country, and beyond the terrible state laws they propose that does have national consequences as well for things like redistricting - but I think the idea of OMG CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION INCOMING is just a boogeyman.

I say he will not finish his first term. Only one of us is correct, we shall see who that is.

Doesnt matter because i have results from the US as well, these online sources were just convenient since they are online. Btw im not sure if you are a troll or just a littlebit dumb, but judging from your latest posts i think i shouldnt be talking to you.

Inso0 can't actually find any posts to respond to here, because that would require him to formulate an actual argument rather than make up blatant strawmen

In classic Cool Runnings fashion, Trump will be carrying his busted-ass bobsled by hand over the finish line as people look on in stunned silence. A slow clap will start somewhere in the crowd, and we'll all be proud of the narcissistic gameshow host who managed to make it to the POTUS finish line even with 8 years of people laughing at him for being somewhere he doesn't belong.

Then I'll post some inflammatory things about newly inaugurated President Chelsea Clinton and likely be banned.

Fun times will be had by all.

I think we are pretty much there bro.

This is gonna get really, really good. Dude is a crook for sure. He isn't going to take an investigation into family finances lying down. That's where the good stuff is.

all a game to you, the people who get hurt dont matter, theyre not you

How much of a backlash will he suffer for his failures. He has failed to deliver on a lot of his key promises which isn’t terribly abnormal except the way trump made his promises then continued to scream about them long after taking office.

At the very least it has to inhibit his ability to rally crowds for a 2020 campaign with a new set of promises, one would help.

GWB was stupid for a president. DJT is stupid for a person.

I suspect that while avid follows of the news/politics are either hip to the fact Trump is totally full of **** and cannot deliver on his promises (normal people), or simply don't care or aren't interested in results (a lot of Deplorables, happy enough just to not have a Democratic President and/or simply into the Trump style alone) --- there are some low information or not that attentive voters who will have the false promises become clearer to them over time. It's a slow process. Is it a huge number of people? Probably not. But Trump didn't have a huge coalition, so losing small percentage of voters with each **** up and promise-not-kept will eventually make him politically impotent/unelectable. Not building the wall might lose him 1 of every 250 deplorables. Not raining manufacturing jobs from the sky all over the Midwest loses him another 1 out of every 150 of his voters. Being an unhinged clownshow loses him 1 out of every 150 Trump voters. Etc. etc. Eventually add it up, and he'll lose some significant percentage of his voters, and he can't really afford to lose any of them.

I agree that in 2018 the GOP will just campaign against Hillary again and in 2020 Trump will have new enemies and new stabbed-in-the-back-theories and new amazing bull**** to peddle, and he'll win some back. I am not predicting Democratic waves necessarily. But again, he needs to win everyone from his ~2016 coalition back. Needs to fade population/demographic shifts (e.g., older, whiter votes dying).