Those poor people buying insurance from this dip****.

I don't think imaginary people will suffer too much.

Not only are the partisan they are clearly a Russian propaganda tool.

Lots of people ridiculously put faith into what was and still is an unconnected twitter account. Pretty easy target for Russia to get an in to spread their propaganda. It's not like Wikileaks is some stalwart American media institution.

It's a twitter account owned by a foreigner and the only thing we know is the guy who started it is hiding in an embassy providing zero transperancy.

I have bashed Wikileaks from the beginning but I can understand how and why people got pulled in initially but that was over years ago. That any American still puts any trust or confidence in them is ridiculous. It's literally a tool being used to undermine America. Either Assange has been compromised or just lost control of it entirely it doesn't really matter.

Trump is clearly pushing this "don't vote on anything until trumpcare" because he doesn't want them to vote on a bill to prevent mueller from being fired

I'm grunching last 5 hours so sorry if slow pony

There is no reason to believe he sells insurance. It's already been pointed out that he is a huge liar.

Anyone else picking up large whiffs of Chinese corruption coming out of team Trump? I keep hearing the same buzzwords: Kushner, billions, repaid loans to Russia, TPP, Trump transition "congratulations" phone call...and last but not least, Mueller.

I'll post a follow up when/if the media pulls this together into one piece.

Just think though...if we're heading into a crazy war with NK while having heavily compromised US-Russia AND US-China relations, guess who is ****ed?

Will do. I didn't want this to turn into another ObamaCare debate, but that seems to be the obsession that sets off other posters. I won't post about the Golden ACA ITT or the Awan facts.

>and your widely debunked garbage conspiracy theories about pakistani it guys

Labeling something a conspiracy is simply a tactic unless it is a conspiracy. Labeling doesn't make something so. You're free to point out what fact is inaccurate in this NeverTrump shill rag's article. The journalist is quite good and roundly respected. He prosecuted the WTC bombers (knows a thing or two about the law/DC).

For example, were the Awan's not arrested for bank fraud? Did they not blackmail their parents? Did DWS not keep them on for far too long? Were their family members paid unusually high rates for their services? Were these services not carried out for many in the DNC? Why were they running away to Pakistan when they had such a sweet gig?

But, as promised, I won't post ITT anymore as it's clearly an ANTI-Trump only circlejerk thread. Sometimes bubbles don't want to be pierced.

I'll leave with these parting thoughts:

1. Russia is a ruse
2. The ACA will explode
3. The DNC/Swamp is on notice—the Awans are only the beginning—this is HUGE.

Jake

I belive my work is done.

Shove it up your ass, Jake.

Did you get the scrotal cysts you mention in the other thread treated for $30?
Ache

I've had to keep asking my trump supporting friend this. DWS is all the rage in the Trumpverse right now as they try to distract. They are really obsessed with the IT guy leaving the country.

Clearly they are being fed misdirection to pull them off all the mind shifting reality going on!

You can believe what you want. I'd provide my NPN, easily searchable on NIPR, but what good would that do me? Zero. I notice your conspiracy theory re: me not knowing what a deductible is turned out to be a farce and you chose not to respond. Admit you were wrong, if you're an upstanding gentleman!

In terms of my posting history on BBV4L, it just might be the case that BBV4L is BBV4L and that Misti Stevenson didn't really get abducted by the Moogoos and that I actually hate Tammi's chicken spaghetti. (She did and I don't.)

You're like the type of person who would attack sweet Kellyanne Conway for mentioning "alternative facts." Instead of understanding that some facts get more coverage than others, you take the most uncharitable interpretation and assume she lives in some diabolical alternate universe.

Jake

this winking rube sure likes to recite his substance free garbage ad nauseum

Lol, precisely how?

Jake

Nice try, hick.

Jake

Are you trying to be the SECOND health insurance salesman in this forum who didn't understand health insurance? We already have one of those but his ignorance seemed to stop short of yours.

But of course you are just trolling. I just assume your previously claimed background of dumb criminal with a bad back who is unemployable is the real you. If we didn't already have a health insurance salesperson who posted here who didn't understand health insurance your RUCE would not be a tiny bit believable.

It is not a conspiracy theory to read your post that said $30 would cover your catastrophic illness and correctly understand that those words mean that you would think that $30 would cover your catastrophic illness. Write better if you want to be taken seriously. If you were to correctly describe what would happen if you had a catastrophic illness on your $30 plan, it would have been more like, "Well, if I got really sick, I'd max out my $X000 deductible, then still owe a bunch of money in coinsurance, and then I'd be dropped from my plan the next time it came up for renewal. Then I would be unable to get coverage for this condition or anything loosely related to it going forward."

It is most definitely a conspiracy theory that something something Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is going to silence the Russia thing because the DNC is in cahoots with the media. That is literally and explicitly a conspiracy theory.

Explain how I don't understand health insurance. (Because you didn't.)

This should be good,
Jake

puppyfridayyall2 is a ruse, he hasn't said one thing about the presidency of donald j trump since he copy/pasted that 4000 word list from r/the donald

Lol

...

Wait. This is the quote that you all seem to be misreading.

>I was able to pay $30 for my very high deductible insurance at a young age with BCBS.

Where did I say that $30 means I don't have a deductible? Because that seems to be the collective's interpretation. My deductible was $10,000.

***

Re: the Awan story. The story of their happenings isn't conspiracy. I agree that tying that to Russia is pure conjecture, but I'm conjecturing it now. This story is huge and I predict that the Russia story is past its prime and set to die.

Jake

It's been quoted in rainbows for you multiple times. This was not your only statement on the subject.

***

I rest my case. It's a conspiracy theory.

Originally Posted by puppyfridayYall View Post
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.
If I got sick in the past, that $30 would have covered it.

.....

I left off "after I met my deductible"...is this tough to comprehend?

Jake

It's easy to comprehend that you don't know what you are talking about.