Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-29-2017 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoder
this personnel turnover is expected. Most new presidents get people from the last admin of their party. But Trump was not in sync with GWB admin personnel. So he got people from his campaign to serve. But campaigning and governing is different. So you watch and see which ones excel at governing and get rid of the those that don't. We've had 6 months to observe who is doing well and with more time it will get easier to pick those good at governing. the quality of the Trump admin personnel will improve much over time, just as it did for previous new presidents.
Yeah, should really be smooth sailing from here on out.
07-29-2017 , 01:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
Thinking about this more, I'd divide the right into four major groups, obviously there's overlap between all of these, but:

The "Intellectual" Right: Also called the GOPe, although they power-share that with evangelical types a bit. Neocons, National Review types, Evan McMullin, John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan etc.

The Evangelical Right: Huckabee, Santorum and so on. Usually obsessed with social policy. I'd put Sessions in this category as well.

The Macho Right: The guys for whom the answer to everything is masculinity, dominance and a total lack of empathy. Trump is in this category, to the extent that he has any political beliefs. Also creeps like Sheriff Joe, Steve Bannon, etc.

The Conspiracy Right: Deep State haters, frothing Ron Paulers and Audit The Fed types, Alex Jones, Pizzagaters, Oathkeepers, militias, Alex Wice etc etc. Trump fooled these people into thinking he was one of them by constantly ranting about "fake news" and stolen elections and such. The difference between Trump and this faction is that Trump doesn't have any actual beliefs, whereas the Conspiracy Right have very intensely held and typically crazy beliefs. The anti-war right are all in this group.

There's a fair bit of overlap between those last two groups and they're collectively called the "alt-right". They share a disdain for civilizational norms and the establishment, but they differ on areas where the conspiracy types tend more libertarian - the conspiracists are usually isolationist and suspicious of the government, whereas the macho types see the government as an instrument to crush their enemies, foreign and domestic.

And obviously, if you look for issues which unite all four, what we get is: shafting minorities, lowering taxes, liberal tears.
:thumbup:

excellent post
07-29-2017 , 01:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99


Apparently @RoguePOTUSStaff is very likely some kind of Breitbart/Russia disinformation account.
the immigration one (the alt_uscis one) they tried to find out who that was via the courts but didn't for that one. It's a good sign it's not b/c if it's legit it appears we're completely doomed.

I wasn't following any alt account before it came out in the courts; so it was nice of the trump team for telling me who to follow on immigration issues.
07-29-2017 , 02:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by It's Brandt
Yeah, should really be smooth sailing from here on out.
I think we all remember when Obama's Communication Director called the WH Chief of Staff a paranoiac and accused the WH Chief Strategist of sucking his own dick.

Boys will be boys.
07-29-2017 , 02:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoder
this personnel turnover is expected. Most new presidents get people from the last admin of their party. But Trump was not in sync with GWB admin personnel. So he got people from his campaign to serve. But campaigning and governing is different. So you watch and see which ones excel at governing and get rid of the those that don't. We've had 6 months to observe who is doing well and with more time it will get easier to pick those good at governing. the quality of the Trump admin personnel will improve much over time, just as it did for previous new presidents.
No one can possibly be this deluded
07-29-2017 , 02:07 AM
Do I need to send you over to chiefsplanet?
07-29-2017 , 02:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Apparently we're just recently learning about a very possible 2015 Putin murder in Washington, on US soil.

His media czar, Lesin, "accidentally" died of a multitude of battering and bruising the night before he was scheduled to testify with the DOJ.

Now, this was being downplayed by the government. But did the gang of 8 (McConnell, Rubio, who was hacked by Russia, and 6 others) know about it? If they did, was McConnell aware of this, or anything else Russia, when he threatened Obama not to go public with the election hacking PSI? And lastly, if other GOP learned about this through the party leaders or the RNC, how intimidated are they feeling?

https://twitter.com/SchoofsFeed/stat...65095349702656
In a vaccuum this should be huge news, but given what I know about Russia I think him not being murdered would be far bigger news
07-29-2017 , 02:13 AM
Him murdered on US soil, and we knew it and looked the other way, seems like a very big deal.

I mean let's say Putin gets desperate and decides the only way to accomplish his goals is to stage a terrorist on US soil. Yes it's a big leap, but if he's already killing with impunity on US soil...

You want to turn this country into an oligarchy overnight? Do an Orlando attack but in a white church instead of a gay Latino nightclub. 50-100 dead god-fearing men, women and children - mowed down while trying to worship. We wake up to a completely different country.

Scary stuff.
07-29-2017 , 02:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
Thinking about this more, I'd divide the right into four major groups, obviously there's overlap between all of these, but:

The "Intellectual" Right: Also called the GOPe, although they power-share that with evangelical types a bit. Neocons, National Review types, Evan McMullin, John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan etc.

The Evangelical Right: Huckabee, Santorum and so on. Usually obsessed with social policy. I'd put Sessions in this category as well.

The Macho Right: The guys for whom the answer to everything is masculinity, dominance and a total lack of empathy. Trump is in this category, to the extent that he has any political beliefs. Also creeps like Sheriff Joe, Steve Bannon, etc.

The Conspiracy Right: Deep State haters, frothing Ron Paulers and Audit The Fed types, Alex Jones, Pizzagaters, Oathkeepers, militias, Alex Wice etc etc. Trump fooled these people into thinking he was one of them by constantly ranting about "fake news" and stolen elections and such. The difference between Trump and this faction is that Trump doesn't have any actual beliefs, whereas the Conspiracy Right have very intensely held and typically crazy beliefs. The anti-war right are all in this group.

There's a fair bit of overlap between those last two groups and they're collectively called the "alt-right". They share a disdain for civilizational norms and the establishment, but they differ on areas where the conspiracy types tend more libertarian - the conspiracists are usually isolationist and suspicious of the government, whereas the macho types see the government as an instrument to crush their enemies, foreign and domestic.

And obviously, if you look for issues which unite all four, what we get is: shafting minorities, lowering taxes, liberal tears.
The "Macho" category does not really exist. It is just another part of the Conspiracy category.
07-29-2017 , 03:06 AM
I think the macho/patriarchy is a real thing and is more aptly called authoritarianism than conspiracy theory.

The intellectual right is pretty authoritarian as well, at least in practice. The underlying philosophy, such as it is, may seem individualistic (Ayn Rand/Neitzche), but it's anti-egalitarian. Milton Friedman and Henry Kissinger were setting up dictatorships. It's anti-democratic like The Heritage Foundation and founder Paul Weyrich (see below).

Not all conservatives may directly call for military involvement, but the Ur-Fascist (remember einbert) love of action for action sake and the fear of disorder and of others and the fear of loss of power head towards a fetish for police and military and towards their overuse.

What is being conserved for conservatives and the right? ..... Traditional power structure. That's what's real and consistent. I mean, look at "The Evangelical Right". It's a complete sham from the Business Gospel, to Jim and Tammy Baker, to people talking about how God is guiding Trump's hand.


Last edited by microbet; 07-29-2017 at 03:24 AM.
07-29-2017 , 03:19 AM
The macho thing is super real. It moves politics way more than you think at first glance.

Obama also offers a leadership based on ideals of masculinity but he offers a more smooth and chilled type which is associated to important urban centers.
Trump offers a masculinity that is more primitive and vulgar which is more associated with smaller towns and the rural world.

Gender theory explains a lot of what happens in politics.
07-29-2017 , 03:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
It was a big story at the time. If I knew about it, all those people and many posters here also did.

Edit: ok, not at the time, but late October before the election is likely when I read NPR stories covering it.
The more I think about it, the more I don't like this murder story one bit. It's looking like a Trojan horse.

I can't figure out why the FBI and the DC Police covered up the murder all this time. It smells funny, like the one thing out of place in the whole US-Russia story.
07-29-2017 , 03:31 AM
Don't forget that the best thing for an authoritarian takeover is chaos. Are we seeing chaos anywhere?

(In before Littlefinger/Varys ChaosIsALadder.avi)
07-29-2017 , 03:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by valenzuela
The macho thing is super real. It moves politics way more than you think at first glance.

Obama also offers a leadership based on ideals of masculinity but he offers a more smooth and chilled type which is associated to important urban centers.
Trump offers a masculinity that is more primitive and vulgar which is more associated with smaller towns and the rural world.

Gender theory explains a lot of what happens in politics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jineology

Quote:
The extent to which society can be thoroughly transformed is determined by the extent of the transformation attained by women. Similarly, the level of woman’s freedom and equality determines the freedom and equality of all sections of society. . . . For a democratic nation, woman’s freedom is of great importance too, as liberated woman constitutes liberated society. Liberated society in turn constitutes democratic nation. Moreover, the need to reverse the role of man is of revolutionary importance.
07-29-2017 , 03:47 AM
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/891189302318727168

Man, Trump humiliated his Chief of Staff in private too.

Quote:
The official told the Post that Trump's complaints about Priebus had ramped up in recent weeks.

"It reached a fever pitch of the president complaining about Reince to all of us," the official said. "If we heard it once, we heard it 20 times in the last week - this erosion of confidence. The word was 'weak' - 'weak,' 'weak,' 'weak.' 'Can't get it done.'"
07-29-2017 , 04:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
The "Macho" category does not really exist. It is just another part of the Conspiracy category.
It's a bit arbitrary how you slice it up and really rather than groups they are like dimensions of the right-wing personality that people can score higher or lower on. However, it's kind of crazy to me that you can say that "Macho" doesn't really exist, I'd call it one of the defining traits of the modern GOP, and certainly of Trumpism. Look at the post directly above this one, where what Trump doesn't like about Priebus is that he's "weak". This is a common right-wing insult along with cuck, snowflake, complaining about "safe spaces" etc. There's threatening to beat up protesters and "grab them by the pussy" (just locker room talk ldo). There's the gun fetishism. The worship of law enforcement and especially the military. "Drill baby drill" and coal rolling. I don't know how you explain any of this without reference to masculine posturing. I'd also say that Trump's tough guy posturing is what a lot of his fans like about him.

It's not normal for the Right to be like that in a prosperous democracy. If you look at the UK for example, none of the above is really a thing. Their Trump-esque figure, Boris Johnson, is not anything like as masculine and dominance seeking as Trump. The erstwhile leader of their anti-immigration party, Nigel Farage, is a ponce.
07-29-2017 , 04:17 AM
Consider this...

While everyone else is dealing with a million crazy issues, Trump and Mooch* spend most of their time working together with top loyalists on a plot to get out of this mess. It's a must-do obsession. Trump has all the government agencies at his disposal except a couple, and has shown he doesn't care what it takes to get his way.

Meanwhile, Robert Mueller and his team are watching their movements without distractions. The minute they see that Trump is ready to put a takeover into play, they MUST alert law enforcement (FBI) and we have a big big problem.

This **** is coming to a head earlier than expected. Trump will not let them discover/expose several of the horrible things he's hiding. ThingS plural, because I 100% believe he and loads of people around him are into many illegal activities, by choice or otherwise.

*Mooch got called in because somebody decided that EVEN TRUMP wasn't pushing envelopes and eroding our Democracy fast enough.
07-29-2017 , 04:30 AM
Speaking of dilemmas, once Putin decides that Trump has become a liability in need of execution, will that make him an enemy or a hero?
07-29-2017 , 06:53 AM
Heh. Well, Mueller does have RICO lawyers working with his SC group.

https://twitter.com/ZombieManifesto/...01854884659201
07-29-2017 , 07:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk_nuts
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoder
Этот кадровый оборот ожидается. Большинство новых президентов получают людей от последнего администратора своей партии. Но Трамп не был синхронизирован с персоналом GWB-администратора. Поэтому он получил людей от своей кампании, чтобы служить. Но агитация и управление разные. Итак, вы смотрите и видите, какие из них преуспевают в управлении и избавляются от тех, кто этого не делает. У нас было 6 месяцев, чтобы наблюдать, кто преуспевает, и с большим количеством времени ему станет легче выбирать тех, кто умеет управлять. Качество персонала администрации Trump со временем будет значительно улучшаться, как это было и для предыдущих новых президентов.
Etot kadrovyy oborot ozhidayetsya. Bol'shinstvo novykh prezidentov poluchayut lyudey ot poslednego administratora svoyey partii. No Tramp ne byl sinkhronizirovan s personalom GWB-administratora. Poetomu on poluchil lyudey ot svoyey kampanii, chtoby sluzhit'. No agitatsiya i upravleniye raznyye. Itak, vy smotrite i vidite, kakiye iz nikh preuspevayut v upravlenii i izbavlyayutsya ot tekh, kto etogo ne delayet. U nas bylo 6 mesyatsev, chtoby nablyudat', kto preuspevayet, i s bol'shim kolichestvom vremeni yemu stanet legche vybirat' tekh, kto umeyet upravlyat'. Kachestvo personala administratsii Trump so vremenem budet znachitel'no uluchshat'sya, kak eto bylo i dlya predydushchikh novykh prezidentov.
FYP
FYP
07-29-2017 , 08:15 AM
Anyone want to tell this guy that he just lost a vote 49-51?






https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...57113565163520
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...59245106278400
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...60230876659713
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...61878005092353
07-29-2017 , 08:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Do I need to send you over to chiefsplanet?
if you combined the threads from chiefsplanet and 2+2 you'd have a discussion that reflects American opinion in general, with lots of extremes and a little bit of moderates in the middle.
07-29-2017 , 08:19 AM
Just spoke to someone who works moderately high up in Australian sigint. They said they spoke to a US four-star general who said Trump is constantly calling whichever intel organization it is. The general said their boss (again, whoever that is) is basically living in the White House. Good to know Trump is taking advice from someone other than Fox & Friends.
07-29-2017 , 08:20 AM
Get Smart!

07-29-2017 , 08:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
It's a bit arbitrary how you slice it up and really rather than groups they are like dimensions of the right-wing personality that people can score higher or lower on. However, it's kind of crazy to me that you can say that "Macho" doesn't really exist, I'd call it one of the defining traits of the modern GOP, and certainly of Trumpism. Look at the post directly above this one, where what Trump doesn't like about Priebus is that he's "weak". This is a common right-wing insult along with cuck, snowflake, complaining about "safe spaces" etc. There's threatening to beat up protesters and "grab them by the pussy" (just locker room talk ldo). There's the gun fetishism. The worship of law enforcement and especially the military. "Drill baby drill" and coal rolling. I don't know how you explain any of this without reference to masculine posturing. I'd also say that Trump's tough guy posturing is what a lot of his fans like about him.

It's not normal for the Right to be like that in a prosperous democracy. If you look at the UK for example, none of the above is really a thing. Their Trump-esque figure, Boris Johnson, is not anything like as masculine and dominance seeking as Trump. The erstwhile leader of their anti-immigration party, Nigel Farage, is a ponce.
It's kind of inevitable that if you bucket a large group into a handful of categories that there will be imperfections. That exercise is an inherently a simplifying intellectual framework. I tend to agree with your observation that there is a significant masculine posturing element to the Trump wing of the party. Is it a defining characteristic or just a trait? Probably not much point in debating that.

It's interesting how the American right can try to legitimize itself in different ways. On the one hand, you can try to have a refined and, frankly, effeminate type like Buckley as a symbol. That's a way to make right wing ideas feel like part of the normal discourse of the high-thinking establishment. Alternatively, you can have an Eastwood type, pushing conservatism as real Americanism, before the wimps ruined America. The second approach naturally comes with a healthy dose of masculine posturing.

      
m